Somalia and the Nairobi IGAD summit
On July 5, the regional body, IGAD (Inter-Governmental Authority on Development), held an emergency summit in Nairobi to discuss the Sudan Ethiopia border tensions.
It was not lost on observers that on the day of the summit, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) of Somalia was in Ankara addressing a forum convened by the Turkish foreign policy think-tank, SETA Foundation. Possibly, the Nairobi meeting was hastily convened and there might have been a genuine scheduling clash, but is it conceivable that HSM deliberately opted to stay away or downgrade Somalia's participation?
The absence of Somalia’s new president from this meeting, certainly, has raised eyebrows; Mogadishu sent a delegation led by the former deputy PM, Mahdi Guled. Many observers expected that the Somali president would leap at the chance of hobnobbing with his peers and forging new alliances.
To understand the context, one needs to look at IGAD, the disarray within, the organisational regional power dynamics and the calculations of the new Somali president.
IGAD as an organisation has been less active on regional peace and security issues for some years. The Nairobi summit may seem like an attempt to make the organisation more engaged on emerging conflict issues, but the reality is that more needs to be done to make IGAD respond better to regional challenges.
The summit was designed to nudge Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed Ali and Sudan’s Gen Abdel-Fattah al-Burhan to try to find an amicable settlement to the Al-Fashaga border dispute. In some ways, it helps PM Abiy deflect growing internal discontent over his handling of the border dispute. The Amhara, in particular, who looked up to the Ethiopian PM to secure their stakes in the contested agricultural lands, feel hugely disappointed. Some also feel “betrayed” at the manner in which Abiy allowed the Sudanese army to regain the bulk of Al-Fashaga from “occupation” by Amhara farmers. Abiy, with the help of the Nairobi summit buys time to manage Amhara discontent; already dangerously at boiling point following a spate of massacres in Oromia in recent weeks.
Sudan’s Gen Burhan, unlike Abiy, faces no domestic backlash over the Al-Fashaga crisis. Most Sudanese want Burhan to capitalise on Ethiopia’s current weakness and consolidate their grip on the contested border region. Beyond playing nice at a regional forum, Burhan has little to gain or give. To cede territory will make him lose face with his own people.
For the Kenyan hosts, the Sudan-Ethiopia talks is seen as a major diplomatic success. Nairobi has recently also been engaged in efforts to broker a settlement in DRCongo and Ethiopia. President Uhuru Kenyatta, whose term ends after elections in August, just a few weeks from now, would probably love to leave also likely he sees himself now as a regional peace broker and keen to burnish further his resume.
Somalia under HSM would like to be an active regional player. Hassan Sheikh has been critical of his predecessor, Mohammed Abdullahi Farmaajo’s pivot to Eritrea and the creation of the so-called Tripartite Alliance (that brought together Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea in a strategic partnership). The alliance was widely viewed as an attempt to weaken or fragment IGAD. HSM, in theory, is better disposed towards IGAD than Farmaajo.
Like other weaker members of the grouping, Somalia would like to see less hegemony exerted by the powerful states (Kenya and Ethiopia) and a more egalitarian body that functions through consent. Mogadishu disagrees for example with the established tradition of selecting the top leader of the organisation from only Kenya and Ethiopia. A meeting to discuss long-delayed reform of IGAD is what would interest Mogadishu more. That, for now, may seem like a distant prospect.
But there are other dynamics. HSM’s relations with both Kenya and Ethiopia remain shaky. Attempts in mid June to repair Kenya-Somalia relations have not yet paid off. Nairobi strong-armed Mogadishu into lifting a ban on khat imports from Kenya, but stalled on a promise to concede on a raft of unofficial demands by the Somalis; among them ease of visas, Kenyan support for Somalia membership of COMESA. A recent protocol row over the Somaliland flag has added to the febrile climate. The Kenyan electoral timetable has also made it difficult for policy makers to fine-tune and choreograph “normalisation”.
HSM promised a new era in which Somalia will be at peace with itself and with the rest of the world (Somaali heshiis ah, dunidana heshiis la ah). He is certainly keen to build a healthier foreign policy that reduces tensions with neighbours and enhances cooperation. But he is unlikely to bend to the will and whims of powerful neighbours.
The onus is on Kenya – the only regional actor with diplomatic credibility and heft – to steer Somalia gently into a cooperative mode, not an antagonistic mode.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.