Echoes of the RRA: Identity and Power in South West State
The Rahanweyne Resistance Army (RRA) did not emerge from a shir (conference) in October 1995 to defend a government, nor to overthrow it. Rather, the militia —whose name was even explicit in its defence of a unified Digil-Mirifle identity —arose from the ruin of Bay and Bakool in the years prior, and decades of structural inequalities. Over 30 years later, with the violent grapple for the political future of South West State resuming, the potent histories of the RRA are similarly resurfacing in the rhetoric from both regional President Abdiaziz Laftagareen and his Mogadishu-backed rivals. But who were the RRA? And why-- over three decades since it was formed-- does its recollection still invoke such intense feeling?
For centuries, the Rahanweyne, an agro-pastoralist community, have resided in the fertile riverine lands of southern Somalia, making up the majority of Bay, Bakool and significant parts of Lower Shabelle. But in Somalia's highly stratified society, the Digil-Mirifle too have long been considered near the bottom of the totem pole, regarded and referred to as 'Sab'- positioned outside the 'Samaale' clan lineages, such as the Darood, Hawiye, and Isaaq. Across the 20th century, colonial and post-colonial social engineering compounded such discrimination, epitomised by the standardisation of Af-Maxaa as Somalia's official language in 1972, the dialect of northern Somalia, rather than Af-Maay, that of the Rahanweyne.
Such exclusion and subjugation extended to all facets of life, with Siyaad Barre's regime's structural reorganisation of the south-central regions in 1975 fragmenting the Rahanweyne's political weight across multiple regions and diluting their influence. In the following years-- particularly after the calamitous Ogaden War-- the Rahanweyne and other disadvantaged agrarian communities further suffered from state-sponsored land dispossessions, with regime clients gifted vast tracts of their arable territories as Barre in vain sought to shore up his collapsing regime. Neither the Digil nor the Mirifle had accumulated arms on a scale comparable to the Hawiye or Darood, leaving them systematically vulnerable once central authority disintegrated.
By the early 1990s, Bay and Bakool had been the site of the bubbling civil war for several months, with the limited Rahanweyne force of the Somali Democratic Movement-- formed in 1989-- proving unable to defend its communities. Through late 1991 and into 1992, Bay and Bakool became a killing ground for successive militia invasions — first Barre's retreating Mareehan forces, which systematically looted grain stores, and then Mohamed Farrah Aydiid's United Somali Congress (USC), which arrived as 'liberators' and stayed as occupiers. And so, by mid-1992, the twin effects of civil war and engineered famine had killed an estimated 500,000 disproportionately Rahanweyne people, mostly children, whose agricultural base had been systematically eroded by looting.
Though US-led intervention in late 1992 did restrain some of the extremes of the brutal inter-clan fighting, Aydiid's forces continued to weaponise the famine by extorting the UN relief intended for the dispossessed. And across the country, Somalia fragmented into warlord-administered fiefdoms, with minority clan communities — the Rahanweyne foremost among them — remaining subject to land and livestock predation. Even so, the UN's presence was notable in enabling the Rahanweyne to occupy administrative positions in their own territory, with the RRA later reviving elements of these governance structures in the early 2000s. But with the withdrawal of the ill-fated UNOSOM II, Aydiid's faction of the USC reasserted control over Bay and Bakool in 1995, removed the Digil-Mirifle Supreme Governing Council, and established domination over the Rahanweyne once more.
But the USC's extinguishing of the brief glimmer of Rahanweyne self-governance proved the trigger for the creation of the RRA. In October 1995, military officers, elders, and intellectuals drawn across the Digil and Mirifle convened west of Baidoa with the express intent to defend pan-Rahanweyne interests, with Colonel Hassan Mohamed Nur Shaatiguduud (Red Shirt) elected chair of the new movement. Though a former mid-ranking security officer, recollections of Shaatiguduud suggest a capable and broadly moderate leader, cut from a different cloth than most other Somali warlords aspiring for state control elsewhere in the country.
Yet without the necessary firepower, it would take another three years before the RRA retook Huddur in October 1998, and only then spurred on by the emergence of Ethiopian support, which had been formalised during UN-facilitated conferences in 1996 and 1997. At that time, Addis's interest in securing its border was shaped by the conflict with Al-Ittihad al-Islamiyya (AIAI), a broader strategy of cultivating proxy forces to establish a buffer zone along its Somali frontier, and concerns about Eritrea's sponsorship of anti-Ethiopian forces in southern Somalia. The RRA, with Ethiopian backing, eventually ousted Hussein Aydiid's forces from Baidoa in June 1999, and by September, his USC faction had entirely withdrawn from Bay and Bakool. Yet so great was the destruction of Baidoa and the displacement of the preceding decade that only 3,000 people were estimated to remain in the city. Unsurprisingly, much like Somaliland, these militias were considered as liberators from outside clan brutality, imbuing them with genuine legitimacy that endures to this day.
In the months following the ousting of Hussein Aydiid, the RRA subsequently expanded its administrative structures across Bay and Bakool, broadly following the pattern of rewarding military participation with political representation. Nevertheless, several district commissions did include non-Rahanweyne minorities, and some strides were made in revenue collection and security, such as through the absorption of former fighters into local police. And unlike the riverine areas of the Juba and Shabelle valleys, inter-clan competition in the agricultural areas of Bay and Bakool was comparatively limited, in part due to the scarcity of state-driven extractive landholding. Moreover, the Rahanweyne's land tenure norms-- particularly the practice of sheegad, the integration of non-clan into their genealogies-- helped mollify internal conflicts. Unsurprisingly, the emerging administration was also explicitly federalist-- continuing a long legacy of the Rahanweyne's support for decentralised authority-- and would oppose the stuttering attempts to impose a monopolistic government in Mogadishu.
The RRA did not last, however, as internal factionalism over the direction of the administration cut through in 2002. In particular, Shaatiguduud's attempts to lay claim to 6 regions in April under the banner of South West State stalled. Timed to reposition Shaatiguduud as a regional president rather than faction leader at the IGAD Nairobi reconciliation conference, it exacerbated tensions within the RRA's leadership. And, in turn, Shaatigaduud's two deputies, including a key ally of Villa Somalia and Speaker of Parliament Aden Madoobe today, mobilised their sub-clans against his faction. By late 2002, the RRA had fragmented and the administration had collapsed, with Baidoa representing the epicentre of renewed intra-Rahanweyne violence and checkpoints proliferating through the region. The resulting governance vacuum would, in the years that followed, contribute to the conditions that enabled Al-Shabaab's expansion into the interriverine areas.
The RRA may not have endured, with the subsequent years for Bay and Bakool marked by the fraught attempts to 're-birth' the Somali state, the Ethiopian invasion of 2006 and the rise of Al-Shabaab. But the RRA's most important contribution arguably-- and which persists in the rhetoric today-- relates to the political-sociological consolidation of a unified Rahanweyne identity, subsuming the agro-pastoralist Digil and Mirifle groupings into one. It provided a vehicle for the historically marginalised and demobilised agro-pastoralists to construct a unified identity and, for the first time in post-independence Somalia, assert autonomous territorial control.
Today, though, the two factions vying for supremacy in South West are not invoking the RRA out of fidelity to its legacy, but rather to claim its political capital. Laftagareen remains deeply unpopular amongst many of the influential Mirifle sub-clans with good reason, with the South West president having comprehensively shunned inclusion within Baidoa and subsumed his region within Mogadishu's centralising agenda for years. But for many, even despite Laftagareen's unpopularity, the prospect of renewed incorporation by a Hawiye-dominated government in Mogadishu sits equally uneasily with memories of the RRA's independence, particularly whilst the internal divisions of the Rahanweyne are once again being actively weaponised. Indeed, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's explicit exultations to the Leysan to rise up against Laftagareen speak to a centralising project that echoes the very hierarchies the RRA once rose to resist. And so, with the complex memory of the RRA remaining very much alive as a political force, the nature of power, legitimacy, and belonging is once again at stake in South West.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.