The Perils of a Grey Transition
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Last week, mediation attempts by the US, UK and supported by the EU foundered after HSM refused to budge on his 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) project. The collapse of the three-day mediated direct talks between HSM and his principle opponents - Sa'id Abdullah Deni and Sheikh Sharif - is a major setback, likely to strain relations between Mogadishu and its key foreign supporters.
On Friday morning, 15 May, just before another round of talks at the Halane Complex in Mogadishu, HSM gave a defiant speech to a group of youth cadres of his Justice and Solidarity Party vowing never to relinquish his ambition to conduct OPOV. It was clear to observers the hardline position by Villa Somalia left little room for meaningful compromise.
Sharif's comment
Meanwhile, the opponents of HSM appear as defiant as ever. In a speech after the talks broke down, Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, said: "Hassan has chosen the exact spot on which he prefers to die." The comment has been seized upon by pro-Villa Somalia micro-bloggers as evidence the opposition wants to "kill" HSM. This is a deliberate misinterpretation. First, the comment is based on a Somali proverb "hal walba meeshay is digto ayaa lagu qalaa" (a she-camel chooses the exact spot on which it prefers to be slaughtered - translated to an English idiom - 'you are often your worst enemy.' What therefore Sharif meant is closest to the English proverb: 'choosing a hill on which to die on.' In other words, by deliberately pushing the Somali state in dangerous course, HSM cannot be absolved of bearing the consequences.
A bigger problem for the opposition is how it navigates the grey transition. It cannot at this stage mobilise forces and mount an armed insurrection. That would delegitimise its cause. Abandoning dialogue and taking the protests to the streets - as is now being mulled - is equally fraught. Somalia has no history of organised popular protests; change has always been brought about through violence and coups. Another failed 'popular uprising' in Mogadishu will likely further weaken the opposition.
The limits of 'grey' survival strategies
A grey transition represents a sophisticated evolution in authoritarian survival strategies. Unlike a traditional military coup executed through overt force, it weaponises the very mechanics of democracy - elections and legislative adjustments - to achieve anti-democratic outcomes. The aim is often to preserve incumbent power rather than consolidate democratic institutions. Grey transitions are typically accompanied by legal manoeuvres to provide just enough cover to evade absolute international isolation; bypass broad political agreement, trade long-term stability for immediate tenure extension.
The executive overreach by Villa Somalia risks triggering failure: the FGS will lose the moral authority to govern and mediate between competing clans and regional states; Somalia's delicate dispensation will devolve from an aspiring unitary state into a volatile confederation of armed regional rivals. The deficit in legitimacy will threaten national army cohesion, pave the way for donor retrenchment and a violent backlash from an alienated opposition.
The West's dilemma
Western partners face an acute strategic dilemma: forceful opposition to HSM risks collapsing the federal government and empowering Al-Shabaab. Conversely, backing his unilateral roadmap breaks the federal pact and drives the country toward fragmentation.
Donors must deploy financial leverage to extract critical institutional concessions, ensuring the independence of the election commission and the courts. This must be paired with strict "red-line diplomacy" threatening targeted sanctions against violent spoilers.
The Pragmatic Way Forward
Managing a grey transition successfully does not mean achieving a perfect democracy. Success is pragmatically enforcing peaceful coexistence, nudging a political settlement despite the presence of illegitimate rules.
The international community must pivot away from passive endorsement toward structured, conditional leverage. Unconditional acceptance of a unilateral extension risks deep political fragmentation and institutional paralysis. Conversely, total rejection may trigger a severe constitutional crisis.
The immediate objective must be hybrid electoral compromise before late 2026: the incumbent retains short-term operational continuity, but only in exchange for conceding an inclusive electoral model that offers the opposition a fair chance to compete.
The unilateral constitutional amendments must be downgraded to a temporary framework, subject to a mandatory review in the next parliamentary cycle.
International stakeholders must treat a modified/negotiated transition as a "least-bad option," conditioning all fiscal, diplomatic, and security assistance on immediate, inclusive electoral compromise.
To prevent total state regression, international donors must enforce strict conditions that guarantee a consensus-driven political process.
The crisis cannot be resolved through rigid, binary choices. Progress requires moving away from the unfeasible "one-person, one-vote" ideal and the outdated 4.5 clan-based representation model. To achieve this:
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.