Al-I'tisaam: The Silent Twin of Al-Shabaab
Without Al-Ictisaam b'il Kitaab wa Sunna (Al-I'tisaam), you cannot understand Al-Shabaab. The shadowy neo-Salafist movement is the 'big brother' of the violent Al-Qaeda affiliate, and it is no exaggeration to refer to it as the single most important, least understood force in Somali politics. The legitimate and licit ideological twin to Al-Shabaab, Al-I'tisaam is the silent partner that has peacefully advocated the jihadists' objectives for over two decades. At times, the two movements have clashed —particularly in the early 2010s —but today, they are engaged in a prickly competition for the same end goal: "to establish [in the words of Al-I'tisaam] the Religion of Allah on the earth and to rule by His Legislation." And while Al-Shabaab may have seized the headlines with its armed struggle, it is Al-I'tisaam's version of jihad that has earned the movement its place as the most influential neo-Salafi group in Somalia, operating a vast array of businesses, charities, madrassas, mosques, universities and much more besides. And with such wealth has come legitimacy and influence; Al-I'tisaam's sway extends to Hargeisa, Garowe, Mogadishu, and even Nairobi.
Al-Shabaab and Al-I'tisaam share their beginnings in Somalia's first homegrown Salafi-jihadist group and Al-Qaeda affiliate, known as Al-Itihaad Al-Islaami (AIAI), which was established in 1983 as an underground movement and emerged into the public sphere in the early 1990s. Fusing Salafi reformism with Qutbist revolutionary precepts, AIAI's ideological makeup has endured within its two main descendants, who continue to challenge Somalia's historical blend of Shafi'i Islam and Sufi practices. Although prominent in several areas of the country, including northeast Somalia and Gedo, AIAI was disbanded by 1997, following a series of heavy defeats at the hands of the Ethiopian military.
By then, a split within the movement had already begun to crystallise into two wings. One group was convinced that conditions in Somalia were not ripe for militarised jihad, and devoted itself to da'wa (proselytism) and tarbiya (education) under the banner of Al-I'tisaam. The other group, committed to armed struggle and inspired by the successes of the Taliban, renamed itself Salafiyya Jihadiyya and dispatched a first cohort of fighters to train in Afghanistan. By 2002, following the American invasion of Afghanistan, the leaders of this group had returned to Somalia and were ready to relaunch their movement as Al-Shabaab. Today, after more than two decades of armed struggle, Al-Shabaab has emerged as the best-known, wealthiest, and most heavily armed affiliate of Al-Qaeda, and can be aptly compared to a 'proto-state' with revenues comparable to Somalia's Federal Member States and its worth measurable in terms of GDP. Meanwhile, since its inception, Al-I'tisaam has come to dominate the country's social and business sectors, with major extraterritorial hubs in Kenya and Djibouti.
Notably, however, Al-I'tisaam has never disavowed the use of armed struggle within its founding texts. And any absence of suicide bombing should not be taken for moderation, with a cadre of senior figures within the movement emerging from AIAI and remaining wedded to the extremist ideology that it sought to impose in the 1990s. Prominent among them is Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, the vice-chairman and military commander of AIAI. An unrepentant neo-Salafist jihadist, he was one of the mentors of spy chief Fahad Yasin, and despite his house arrest in Mogadishu, has continued to influence national politics.
While Al-Shabaab has sought to topple the federal state through force, Al-I'tisaam has steadily and quietly accrued leverage and legitimacy. These parallel paths have brought Al-Shabaab and Al-I'tisaam both into violent competition as well as cohabitation and affinity. In early 2006, the two movements reunited, together with others, to form the Islamic Courts Union (ICU), which opposed the Ethiopian-backed Transitional Federal Government. But it did not last, with the Ethiopian army deposing the ICU from Mogadishu and splintering the various Islamist movements once again. When the former ICU leader, Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed, was elected as interim president as part of the Djibouti peace talks in 2009, Al-Shabaab turned against his government, together with a splinter group of Al-I'tisaam named Hisbul Islaami.
Across the intervening decades and away from the frontlines, Al-I'tisaam has been at the forefront of aggressively promoting a more conservative strain of Islamist society and ideology. Social and economic capital are the roots of Al-I'tisaam's power and have been at its core of helping establish the 'complicit surround' of support or acceptance for Al-Shabaab. Financed through Al-I'tisaam's immense wealth, Islamist charities and development organisations such as the 'Al Karam Awareness & Development Organisation' have built the sparkling new mosques and madrasas dotted throughout major cities in the Somali peninsula. This is not to say that there do not remain tensions between Al-I'tisaam and the other myriad Islamist movements in Somalia, particularly those affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood, but the movement's substantial wealth invested into social and economic clout has certainly put the others at a disadvantage.
Al-I'tisaam has been able to finance its ideological vision by taking root in the gaps of the Somali state and free-for-all economy. Along with substantive business links to the Middle East, individuals affiliated with Al-I'tisaam dominate some of the most profitable industries in Somalia, including banking, telecommunications, real estate, and money transfer companies. This is true in both southern Somalia, as well as in Puntland and Somaliland, two polities where the political sway of Al-I'tisaam has been increasingly felt in recent years. In Somaliland, for example, eye-wateringly expensive energy costs can be partially attributed to the monopolistic, cartel-like business practices employed by energy enterprises affiliated with Al-I'tisaam. And with such cash on hand, politicians of all clans and political creeds find it immensely challenging to deny Al-I'tisaam when it comes knocking.
Yet Al-I'tisaam remains an amorphous group, not easily defined nor with distinguishable members or political ambitions. Sheikh Bashir Ahmed Salad chairs Somalia's 'Ulema Council', but for the most part, the movement prefers to remain in the shadows, engineering the social, political, and economic conditions for an Islamist state. Nevertheless, there are several known senior politicians and religious leaders affiliated with the group who routinely pontificate on a range of issues, such as the firebrand government cleric Sheikh Ali Wajis. What is evident is that much of the movement is antithetical towards constitutional and democratic governance and opposed to federalism, preferring a centralised, autocratic, and Islamist state.
It was not until 2017, however, that the group tasted direct power in the halls of Villa Somalia through Fahad Yasin. The right-hand man of Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo, Yasin is a former AIAI member, a self-professed member of Al-I'tisaam and a close ally of Doha. Under the auspices of Villa Somalia, it was Fahad-- with the support of Qatar-- that relaunched dialogue between Al-I'tisaam and Al-Shabaab. The two movements were eventually unable to be reconciled, having come to regard each other as competitors. But under Fahad, Al-I'tisaam became far more assertive and coalesced from a more general religious movement into a direct political force. Although initially diminished by the return of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, who belongs to the Damul Jadiid (New Blood) faction of the Muslim Brotherhood, it has remained consequential as a kind of 'deep state' within the government, holding key positions in government and security. And in particular, since the collapse of relations between Villa Somalia and Jubaland last year, individuals associated with Al-I'tisaam have returned to the forefront, once again advocating for the dismantling of Somalia's federal system. The ideological convergence between the current occupants of Villa Somalia and Al-I'tisaam is hard to miss.
While attempts by Qatar to reconcile Al-Shabaab and Al-I'tisaam have previously failed, that does not mean they are irreconcilable —and particularly not in the context of any collapse or capitulation of the federal government. Despite their rivalries, the ideological convergence of the two neo-Salafist groups regarding federalism, Islam's role in the state, and democracy could end up proving critical in any peace talks between the federal government and Al-Shabaab. Al-I'tisaam is naturally positioned as a 'silent partner' of Al-Shabaab, and may well bring its influence and resources to bear to support any demands of the jihadist group in such talks. Still, a likely arm-wrestle for supremacy in forming any neo-Salafist government would ensue, with Al-I'tisaam aspiring to relegate their jihadist counterparts to a principally military role-- sure to be resisted by Mahad Karatey and others. In the meantime, though, while the federal government's incompetence and myopic, self-serving politics may yet deliver the keys of the kingdom to Al-Shabaab in the coming months, it is Al-I'tisaam that is likely to be the one holding the door.
The Somalia Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.
Last weekend, the Murusade, a major sub-clan of the powerful Hawiye clan family, staged one of the largest and most colourful coronations of a clan chief in recent memory in Mogadishu. The caleemasarka (enthronement) of Ugaas Abdirizaq Ugaas Abdullahi Ugaas Haashi, the new Ugaas or sultan of the Murusade, was attended by thousands of delegates from all parts of Somalia. Conducted next to the imposing and magnificent Ottomanesque Ali Jim'ale Mosque, on the Muslim day of rest, Friday, the occasion blended the Islamic, the regal and the customary; a restatement of an ancient tradition very much alive and vibrant.
With all eyes trained on the Strait of Hormuz blockades and their geopolitical convulsions, discussions and concerns, too, have risen about the perils of other globalised chokepoints, not least the Bab al-Mandab. The threats to the stability of the Bab al-Mandab, the Gulf of Aden, and the Red Sea may not arise principally from the escalatory logic that the US, Iran, and Israel have been locked in, but the threats posed from collapse and contested sovereignty offer little relief. Off Somalia's northern coastline in particular, it is transnational criminal networks — expressed in smuggling, piracy, and, less visibly but no less consequentially, illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing — that define the character of offshore insecurity. It is this last phenomenon that provides the foundation on which much of Somalia's maritime disorder is built, and which remains the most consistently neglected.
Villa Somalia's triumph in Baidoa may yet turn to ashes. Since the ousting of wary friend-turned-foe, Abdiaziz Laftagareen, in late March, the federal government has ploughed ahead with preparations for state- and district-level elections in South West. Nominally scheduled for next week, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has chosen to reward his stalwart parliamentary ally, Aden Madoobe from the Rahanweyne/Hadaamo, with the regional presidency after some vacillation, naming him the sole Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) candidate