A Qatari Cold Shoulder
This week, Somaliland President Abdirahman 'Irro' travelled to Qatar for what was billed as a "historic visit," the first sitting leader of the unrecognised polity to be received in Doha. It certainly proved historic, but unlikely in the way that the Waddani administration hoped for, with the Qatari PM and Foreign Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al-Thani springing a chastening press release following their meeting. The last lines of the Qatari PM's statement were particularly toe-curling for Hargeisa, asserting that "Qatar's belief that Somalia's future is built through openness and constructive communication among all its components, to ensure respect for the sovereignty and national unity of the Federal Republic of Somalia." Though the Somaliland government has tried to brush it off, it may prove a wake-up call for the complexities of navigating relations with Doha and others.
Irro's trip has sparked significant consternation and hand-wringing among the Somaliland opposition, who have criticised the trip as misguided and an embarrassment. It does appear that the Qatari PM deliberately sought to discomfit Hargeisa by welcoming Irro as a genuine statesman before referring to him as a "regional leader" in the subsequent statement. With the senior delegation having returned on Wednesday, the Irro government has since attempted to save face, both emphasising its sovereign credentials and downplaying the Qatari PM's comments as "diplomatic formalities." And responding to levied criticism about the wisdom of the trip, Information Minister Ahmed Yasin Sheikh Ali Ayanle made several astute comments, including that "politics means engaging even with your enemy if it serves your interests." As the president of Somaliland, Irro is justified-- and arguably should-- be making the case for independence in countries where it can expect resistance. Talking only to one's friends and allies often cannot move the needle alone in international politics. Still, it was always unlikely that the intractable Doha would be significantly influenced by a first visit from a Somaliland president, given its consistent foreign policy.
It does appear that there was a degree of naivety amongst the delegation, with several advisors and ministers hoping that their own relationships with Qatar-- dating back to their time in opposition-- would smooth the enduring gulf between Doha and Hargeisa. In particular, financing and development projects were to be sought after, with the Irro administration still badly saddled by the debt of the previous government. There is little doubt that Somaliland requires far greater developmental and humanitarian assistance, being essentially under international sanctions and receiving a fraction of the support that Mogadishu receives. But personal, patronage-based relationships between Somaliland cabinet ministers and Doha are no serious alternative for a functioning, transparent, and bilateral dynamic.
And despite their shared faith, the absolute monarchy of Qatar has never been a natural bedfellow of Somaliland, one of the few regional bright spots for its democratic maturity and civic engagement. Rather, Qatar's foreign policy is perhaps the most consistent of its Gulf counterparts in the Horn of Africa-- persistent in its quiet attempts to elevate Islamist actors and engage as a 'peace mediator' with extremist groups, including Al-Shabaab. It has also remained one of the staunchest allies of Somalia's federal government, though perhaps has not penetrated the incumbent administration to the degree it did during Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo's tenure. Another undercurrent of the Irro trip was Hargeisa's close and profitable relationship with the UAE, which operates the arterial Berbera Port, and is one of Doha's principal geostrategic competitors. It is improbable that Hargeisa did not communicate its intentions for Irro to travel to Qatar without the go-ahead from Abu Dhabi, its closest ally, barring Ethiopia.
Though Somaliland is in dire need of greater budgetary, developmental, and humanitarian assistance, certain types of support from Qatar should be regarded as a Trojan Horse. Health support and food aid are one issue, but the Irro government should carefully examine any aspect related to civil society from Qatar, and whether it aligns with Somaliland's lofty democratic and developmental ambitions. Simultaneously, the growing economic and political tendrils of the Salafist Al-I'tisaam movement into Hargeisa are hard to miss, particularly with a spate of new schools and mosques that have been built. Such concerns about the perforation of the shadowy Islamist movement, with strong roots in Mogadishu and Nairobi as well, have been widely aired on social media in recent days.
It appears that as a self-proclaimed negotiator, Qatar may want to attempt to relaunch dialogue between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, but relations are at a particularly low ebb-- and nor is Doha regarded as a neutral interlocutor. Across multiple years, 10 rounds of negotiations in four countries, Mogadishu has repeatedly proven itself unwilling to make either federation or reunification an attractive prospect, wielding sovereignty and juridical recognition to undermine Somaliland time and again. With Villa Somalia preparing to unconstitutionally launch the SSC-Khaatumo administration in the Sool region as a fully-fledged Federal Member State in July, it would be political suicide for Hargeisa to renew any serious talks at this current juncture, not least with Al-Shabaab having advanced so close to Mogadishu.
Irro's commitment to the cause of Somaliland independence should absolutely not be in doubt after his first months in office. There are genuine questions and concerns, however, about the competency of the Foreign Ministry, which appears nigh-incapable of organising diplomatic visits. Qatar is not the first diplomatic screw-up in recent months, with the Kenya trip nearly entirely derailed by sabotage from Mogadishu until last-minute interventions from long-serving opposition politician Raila Odinga and Kenyan spy chief Noordin Haji. Similar serious mistakes appear to have been made in the visit to Addis, which was originally supposed to have been led by Irro.
Simply turning up in a capital will not open the necessary doors for Somaliland, particularly with the amped-up hyper-nationalist government of Somalia ready to splurge cash to undermine any of its engagements. The president's office has understandably sought to steer foreign policy from its own docket, but such a series of blunders should perhaps trigger a rethink about how and who is best to handle diplomatic affairs. With a visit by Irro to the US anticipated in the coming weeks and with so much at stake, such mistakes can be ill-afforded.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.