Just not that inch
For a government whose slogan was "not one inch" just a few months ago, it might have been more apt to have adopted "not that inch." On 22 April, last year's secret bilateral Somalia-Türkiye oil and gas deal emerged after its submission to the Turkish parliament, revealing that Mogadishu had ceded immense potential profits and sovereignty for pennies. Signed during the geopolitical fallout of the Somaliland-Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and harried through Somalia's parliament, the agreement points to further political and economic vandalism by the current federal administration and its desire to monopolise Somalia's sovereign rents and national resources. While insisting that Addis would have "not one inch" of Somali coastal territory, Mogadishu has offered every centimetre of the country to foreign powers.
Many of the clauses from the agreement are staggering, revealing that in March 2024, Mogadishu essentially forfeited Somalia's potentially most profitable resource to Ankara. The scale of Turkish influence in Villa Somalia and amongst the Mogadishu elite today is hard to overstate, with the level of Turkophilia having climbed fresh heights last year. However, with some discontent brewing around Türkiye's outsized clout, the details of this deal are certain to further alarm those concerned about Villa Somalia's 'fusion' with Recep Tayyip Erdoğan's Neo-Ottoman aspirations.
Entitled 'Agreement Between the Government of the Republic of Türkiye and the Federal Government of the Federal Republic of Somalia in the Field of Hydrocarbons,' the deal was signed last March in Istanbul by Turkish Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar and former Somali Petroleum Minister Abdirizak Omar Mohamed. A former close ally of Hassan Sheikh, Abdirizak was reported to have fallen out with the president over the deal's kickbacks and was subsequently dismissed from his position in December 2024. According to the agreement, Türkiye is permitted to recover as much as 90% of all oil and gas extraction each year to cover operational costs before profits are shared, while all exports and revenue are to be controlled by Ankara and with no Somali oversight necessary. Somalia's share of production profits is further steeply limited, with a royalty cap of just 5%, far below similar deals in other petroleum-rich African nations. And there are a host of different ways that Mogadishu has offered up its sovereignty, not least that Turkish forces are authorised to deploy to protect its investments– with costs again recoverable in Somalia's oil.
Most Somalis have understandably been long frustrated by the lengthy sagas and failure to exploit the country's 'black gold.' Some hoped that such a deal with Türkiye would allow for the exploitation of the estimated 6bn cubic metres of proven natural gas reserves and perhaps as much as 30bn barrels of offshore hydrocarbons. Instead, the agreement is another example of Villa Somalia's endeavours to dominate resources without input from parliament or devolved regional administrations. This has included establishing livestock export monopolies for a single Arab businessman, limiting khat import licenses to a handful of affiliates, and claiming overflight fees from Somaliland by wielding its juridical sovereignty. Offshore, as a result of the corruption of the federal government and others, Somali fishing licenses are some of the cheapest in the world despite the country's territorial waters holding a bountiful supply of tuna and other high-value fish. In one such deal, a Chinese fishing trawler reportedly obtained a four-month tuna season license for just USD 1 million, while Somalia's territorial waters remain a magnet for grey, mafia-style fishing by dubious firms that deploy damaging techniques to maximise harvest.
The deal was further evidence of how Villa Somalia has sought to trade the country's most lucrative resources for geopolitical support, as well as simultaneously undermine the peripheral Somali administrations that it claims jurisdiction over. One more egregious recent example was the attempt to offer the ports of Berbera in Somaliland and Bosaaso in Puntland to the Trump administration. More concerning is the purported intention of the federal government to auction off the Dharoor/Nugaal Valley oil and gas basin to American companies. Symptomatic of a sudden glut of outlandish resource-based deal-making with Washington, it is also another gambit by Villa Somalia to cash in on resources it does not control. However, extraction in the area could reignite conflict between Somaliland and Puntland or stoke local insurrection against both administrations if not handled carefully.
A federal parliamentary committee has finally raised concerns about the deal, ironically only after it was tabled in its Turkish counterpart, as have the Somali hyper-nationalists who were clamouring last year that Ankara and Cairo would 'protect' Somalia from Ethiopian interference. Instead, the bilateral deal was waved through parliament without scrutiny by lawmakers who did not have access to the clauses that would have revealed to them a wholesale surrendering of decision-making regarding oil and gas exploration in Somalia. Overshadowed by the furore surrounding the MoU, the deal's rushed passage signalled a broader erosion of the country's checks and balances.
Last March, part of the deal's rationale lay in Ankara pledging to establish a naval force for Somalia to counter potential Ethiopian 'threats' emerging on the Red Sea. It was never a serious prospect, though, and all discussion of establishing a navy has since evaporated following the detente with Addis and as the on-shore threat of Al-Shabaab has marauded across Middle and Lower Shabelle in recent weeks. Just yesterday, in another dawn raid, jihadists overran the Somali National Army (SNA) at Wargaadi before releasing photos through its Al-Kataib Media Office of several slain soldiers and ma'awiisley fighters. And while Villa Somalia has clamoured over perceived violations of its de jure sovereignty, its own allies have increasingly highlighted the fragility of the federal government. This week, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni damningly proposed that supervision of the country's security and stabilisation portfolio be transferred to a coalition of troop-contributing countries in the African Union peacekeeping mission.
It was an acknowledgement that while the federal government may be nominally recognised as Somalia's sovereign authority, its position has been compromised by its own myopic policies. Museveni's proposal essentially signalled a rollback to the process of the 2000s, a return to the 'building blocks' approach to Somalia's governance and security. Naturally, Villa Somalia rejected the suggestion but was forced to do so as gently as possible, considering that Uganda is providing 4,000 soldiers for the AU peacekeeping mission. This week, regional defence ministers have also been meeting in Mogadishu to discuss the security deterioration, as well as the continued lack of funding for the multilateral mission.
In the 2000s, the Somalia expert and political scientist Ken Menkhaus famously used the term 'Governance without Government' to describe the situation in the country at the time, and how administrations functioned in the absence of a central government. Today, almost the reverse argument could be made that Somalia has had successive federal governments with little interest in governing but instead profiting from Mogadishu's juridical sovereignty and undermining rival Somali polities. But there are still Somali administrations actively pursuing their own domestic and foreign policy, wielding their 'sovereignty' as a positive tool. Puntland, for instance, has been deploying significant resources under 'Operation Hilaac' to fight Islamic State-Somalia in the Al-Miskaad Mountains, while simultaneously pursuing independent relations with Ethiopia, the UAE, and the US. Somaliland, too, continues to demonstrate its democratic maturity, having conducted yet another successful set of one-person, one-vote (OPOV) elections in November 2024 and facilitated another peaceful transition of power.
Such is the damage that Villa Somalia has wrought in three short years, one of the challenges of the next government-- if Mogadishu holds until then-- will be clawing back the country's sovereignty from deals such as the one with Türkiye. This may be further complicated by the fact that, even though it contravenes elements of the Provisional Constitution and overrules the best practices of the transitional political arrangement, it was nevertheless passed by parliament. And Türkiye has little reason to cede its potentially immensely profitable hold on billions of barrels of hydrocarbons. In essence, Villa Somalia has attempted to transform the country into a kind of geopolitical Airbnb where any state can pursue their economic, political, and ideological interests-- as long as they don't mind the riven domestic politics or Al-Shabaab's growing footprint.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.
Last weekend, the Murusade, a major sub-clan of the powerful Hawiye clan family, staged one of the largest and most colourful coronations of a clan chief in recent memory in Mogadishu. The caleemasarka (enthronement) of Ugaas Abdirizaq Ugaas Abdullahi Ugaas Haashi, the new Ugaas or sultan of the Murusade, was attended by thousands of delegates from all parts of Somalia. Conducted next to the imposing and magnificent Ottomanesque Ali Jim'ale Mosque, on the Muslim day of rest, Friday, the occasion blended the Islamic, the regal and the customary; a restatement of an ancient tradition very much alive and vibrant.
With all eyes trained on the Strait of Hormuz blockades and their geopolitical convulsions, discussions and concerns, too, have risen about the perils of other globalised chokepoints, not least the Bab al-Mandab. The threats to the stability of the Bab al-Mandab, the Gulf of Aden, and the Red Sea may not arise principally from the escalatory logic that the US, Iran, and Israel have been locked in, but the threats posed from collapse and contested sovereignty offer little relief. Off Somalia's northern coastline in particular, it is transnational criminal networks — expressed in smuggling, piracy, and, less visibly but no less consequentially, illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing — that define the character of offshore insecurity. It is this last phenomenon that provides the foundation on which much of Somalia's maritime disorder is built, and which remains the most consistently neglected.
Villa Somalia's triumph in Baidoa may yet turn to ashes. Since the ousting of wary friend-turned-foe, Abdiaziz Laftagareen, in late March, the federal government has ploughed ahead with preparations for state- and district-level elections in South West. Nominally scheduled for next week, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has chosen to reward his stalwart parliamentary ally, Aden Madoobe from the Rahanweyne/Hadaamo, with the regional presidency after some vacillation, naming him the sole Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) candidate