Competing Electoral Timelines
Ten days ago, opposition politicians from South West State (SWS) and Jubaland met in Nairobi and Addis Ababa. These conferences intended to navigate a position on the possible divergence from previously agreed-upon electoral timelines in their Federal Member States (FMS). At the heart of these deepening tensions are SWS President Abdiaziz Laftagareen and Jubaland President Ahmed Madoobe’s push for presidential term extensions based on May’s National Consultative Council (NCC) proposed electoral cycle.
In Nairobi, the newly-formed opposition Union of Presidential Candidates in Jubaland declared it had stopped recognising Madoobe as president in August and called for inclusive elections to prevent any administrative vacuum. Meanwhile in Addis, the South West State Salvation Council said it would not accept Laftagareen’s push for another year in office. Jubaland and SWS are not alone; nearly every FMS is now seeing some form of political upheaval over disagreements in their electoral timelines. Galmudug is preparing for elections while simultaneously awaiting the possibility of an extended presidential term, and the constitutional crises in Puntland rumble on.
The sweeping NCC proposals, however, are yet to receive any official ratification by the federal parliament. And since the resumption of the military offensive against Al-Shabaab in central Somalia, discussions over the major constitutional changes have largely been sidelined. Following August’s NCC meeting in Dhusamareeb, however, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) hinted at further consultations on the proposed electoral format. But with the federal parliament now in recess and the NCC without clarification, competing electoral timelines are setting the stage for months of political flux.
In the coming months, as each FMS President’s term expires or the proposed election date passes, these political tensions will likely intensify. These disagreements have shown the potential to spill into violence if left unchecked. In June, dozens were killed in clashes between opposition militia and Puntland security forces as the regional parliament debated contentious amendments to the FMS voting system. With FMS political stakeholders in Jubaland and SWS calling for adherence to their original electoral timelines, there is also a problematic divide between Mogadishu’s objectives and the aspirations of these political movements.
The recent developments in SWS are of particular concern. The SWS opposition, including former Villa Somalia Chief of Staff Hussein Sheikh Mohamud, heavily criticised Laftagareen in their communique on 12 September for failing to “effectively combat the Khawarji [Al-Shabaab] and mobilise SWS communities.” With Laftagareen’s term set to expire in October, as per February’s negotiated Baidoa Agreement, the FMS opposition is now demanding elections before any military offensive in SWS.
Some have accused Laftagareen of deliberately delaying any significant offensives as a tactic to maintain his grip on power. Prominent politicians, including former Speakers of parliament’s Lower House Mohamed Jawari and Mohamed Mursal, and former Finance Minister Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden, have further criticised a perceived concentration of power in Laftagareen’s familial and clan networks in SWS. Without political consensus, it is highly unlikely that the FMS major clans and respective militias will fully engage with the already delayed Phase II offensive in SWS and Jubaland.
While the focus has understandably been on the military offensive in central Somalia, it is impossible to disconnect Somalia’s security from its politics. The noticeable gap between federal political and military planning threatens to undermine the important political progress made under HSM. But political cohesion is a prerequisite for effective stabilisation; otherwise, the Somali National Army is arguably freeing communities for fresh political tensions to fill the space left by Al-Shabaab.
It’s not a new idea that Somalia requires negotiated political settlements for its stability. HSM has taken steps in this direction, temporarily shelving his international commitments to personally lead military campaigns and engage with clan leaders to support the counterinsurgency. These negotiations have shown some notable progress, heralding the return of former Hiiraan Governor Ali Osman Jeyte, a key figure in the Hawadle resistance to Al-Shabaab, to the offensive.
Clarity is essential over the future of the NCC proposals and the FMS electoral timelines. Key stakeholders in Jubaland and SWS should be urged to engage in meaningful dialogue to chart an electoral timeline acceptable to all. Allowing these conflicts to grow would be a grave mistake, Villa Somalia can no longer ignore the fraying political settlements from Puntland to Jubaland.
The Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.