Competing Electoral Timelines
Ten days ago, opposition politicians from South West State (SWS) and Jubaland met in Nairobi and Addis Ababa. These conferences intended to navigate a position on the possible divergence from previously agreed-upon electoral timelines in their Federal Member States (FMS). At the heart of these deepening tensions are SWS President Abdiaziz Laftagareen and Jubaland President Ahmed Madoobe’s push for presidential term extensions based on May’s National Consultative Council (NCC) proposed electoral cycle.
In Nairobi, the newly-formed opposition Union of Presidential Candidates in Jubaland declared it had stopped recognising Madoobe as president in August and called for inclusive elections to prevent any administrative vacuum. Meanwhile in Addis, the South West State Salvation Council said it would not accept Laftagareen’s push for another year in office. Jubaland and SWS are not alone; nearly every FMS is now seeing some form of political upheaval over disagreements in their electoral timelines. Galmudug is preparing for elections while simultaneously awaiting the possibility of an extended presidential term, and the constitutional crises in Puntland rumble on.
The sweeping NCC proposals, however, are yet to receive any official ratification by the federal parliament. And since the resumption of the military offensive against Al-Shabaab in central Somalia, discussions over the major constitutional changes have largely been sidelined. Following August’s NCC meeting in Dhusamareeb, however, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) hinted at further consultations on the proposed electoral format. But with the federal parliament now in recess and the NCC without clarification, competing electoral timelines are setting the stage for months of political flux.
In the coming months, as each FMS President’s term expires or the proposed election date passes, these political tensions will likely intensify. These disagreements have shown the potential to spill into violence if left unchecked. In June, dozens were killed in clashes between opposition militia and Puntland security forces as the regional parliament debated contentious amendments to the FMS voting system. With FMS political stakeholders in Jubaland and SWS calling for adherence to their original electoral timelines, there is also a problematic divide between Mogadishu’s objectives and the aspirations of these political movements.
The recent developments in SWS are of particular concern. The SWS opposition, including former Villa Somalia Chief of Staff Hussein Sheikh Mohamud, heavily criticised Laftagareen in their communique on 12 September for failing to “effectively combat the Khawarji [Al-Shabaab] and mobilise SWS communities.” With Laftagareen’s term set to expire in October, as per February’s negotiated Baidoa Agreement, the FMS opposition is now demanding elections before any military offensive in SWS.
Some have accused Laftagareen of deliberately delaying any significant offensives as a tactic to maintain his grip on power. Prominent politicians, including former Speakers of parliament’s Lower House Mohamed Jawari and Mohamed Mursal, and former Finance Minister Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden, have further criticised a perceived concentration of power in Laftagareen’s familial and clan networks in SWS. Without political consensus, it is highly unlikely that the FMS major clans and respective militias will fully engage with the already delayed Phase II offensive in SWS and Jubaland.
While the focus has understandably been on the military offensive in central Somalia, it is impossible to disconnect Somalia’s security from its politics. The noticeable gap between federal political and military planning threatens to undermine the important political progress made under HSM. But political cohesion is a prerequisite for effective stabilisation; otherwise, the Somali National Army is arguably freeing communities for fresh political tensions to fill the space left by Al-Shabaab.
It’s not a new idea that Somalia requires negotiated political settlements for its stability. HSM has taken steps in this direction, temporarily shelving his international commitments to personally lead military campaigns and engage with clan leaders to support the counterinsurgency. These negotiations have shown some notable progress, heralding the return of former Hiiraan Governor Ali Osman Jeyte, a key figure in the Hawadle resistance to Al-Shabaab, to the offensive.
Clarity is essential over the future of the NCC proposals and the FMS electoral timelines. Key stakeholders in Jubaland and SWS should be urged to engage in meaningful dialogue to chart an electoral timeline acceptable to all. Allowing these conflicts to grow would be a grave mistake, Villa Somalia can no longer ignore the fraying political settlements from Puntland to Jubaland.
The Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
'Give Peace a Chance' was the title of a 1969 single written by John Lennon, recorded during his famous honeymoon 'bed-in' with Yoko Ono. Capturing the counterculture sentiments of the time, it was adopted as an anthem of the anti-Vietnam War movement in the following decade. Thirty years later, a provocative inversion of the title-- 'Give War a Chance'-- was adopted in a well-known Foreign Affairs article by Edward Luttwak in 1999, in which he argued that humanitarian interventions or premature negotiations can freeze conflict, resulting in endless, recurring war. Luttwak contended that war has an internal logic, and if allowed to 'run its course', can bring about a more durable peace.