Sequencing for Success: Liberation, Stabilisation and Reconciliation
In recent years, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has undertaken several clearing offensives against Al-Shabaab (AS), many of which have initially proven successful from a military standpoint. Yet these initial territorial successes often usher in a far more difficult challenge– stabilising seized territory. Failures to effectively stabilise liberated areas have repeatedly led to FGS and regional force withdrawals. And failures to reconcile divided communities have allowed fresh conflict to spring up in AS’s absence. But if Mogadishu can combine military operations with reconciliation and stabilisation efforts, the FGS can increase the chances of achieving sustainable peace and development in liberated areas.
The challenges facing effective stabilisation and reconciliation can be tackled through strategic preparation and sequencing. Both are crucial elements of realising the ‘clear, hold and rebuild’ strategy of the FGS for liberating territories under AS control. The first element of this strategy, ‘clear,’ has seen success. Previous FGS offensives, such as Operation Badbaadho in Lower Shabelle in 2019-2020, showed clearing AS was eminently possible. But three years on from liberating 5 bridges over the Shabelle River, the FGS is still struggling to stabilise these liberated areas. Despite driving out the militant group, the provision of aid and government services remains inadequate and superficial. And the presence of AS close to the reclaimed areas adds further complexity to the ongoing stabilisation efforts.
Relying solely on military operations cannot effectively address the myriad needs of communities freed from AS control. Expectations among liberated communities for better services may be high after years of neglect, especially if they helped displace AS from their territory, as happened last year in central Somalia. Managing and responding to these expectations and needs is crucial to ‘holding’ liberated areas. Equally important is navigating the complex, often contentious, relationships between clans that may have been suppressed or exploited by AS. Finding consensus on governance and resource sharing between communities, and local and federal authorities is the backbone of stabilising liberated areas.
Stabilisation policies should be carefully planned alongside military operations before attempting clearance operations. Integrating community stakeholders into stabilisation plans and preparations for military operations would go someway in navigating the complexities of reestablishing federal and regional authority. This collaboration can also provide communities insight into upcoming operations, allowing them to prepare in advance. Pursuing closer relationships with clan militias and elders has also allowed the FGS to reach further into rural areas, rather than being limited to urban centres.
Clearing AS-held territory without clan support has proven challenging. FGS attempts to mobilise clans in the Haradheere district in Galmudug in phase one of the offensive stalled amid internal clan divisions and a belief that Mogadishu had failed to support them. But through meaningful and early engagement, the FGS and regional authorities can better respond to the concerns of historically marginalised communities. Support for Mogadishu’s offensive against AS in southern Somalia will likely be more limited than it was in Galmudug and Hirshabelle, only increasing the need for early outreach and preparation.
Navigating and stabilising collaboration with clan militias can be complex, however. Clan militias’ intimate knowledge of their communities and terrain has played an integral role in the ongoing FGS offensive. But there have been several occasions where emboldened militias have carried out illegal activities, threatening to undermine local goodwill. Incorporating clan militias into regional forces such as the Darawiish could help professionalise and integrate them into the state’s security architecture. Maintaining a shared focus on fighting AS must be supported to prevent potential disintegration into clan conflicts. Reconciling clans and sub-clans with histories of antagonism should also help limit any rogue militia activity. Simultaneous planning for stabilisation is thus imperative to avoid any power vacuum post-liberation and prevent historical conflicts from re-emerging.
Common cause between communities and the FGS does not create indefinite goodwill towards Mogadishu and regional authorities, however. But providing long-neglected essential services, government structures, and basic infrastructure in liberated areas should help shore up support. Capacity building for local authorities and security forces can also help ensure proper governance and maintain law and order. In a few short months, Haradheere, freed from AS’s grip in January, has flourished. The coastal town has internet access for the first time, and maternal health centres have returned with support from government authorities.
Military successes in recent years have revealed that stabilisation is often far more challenging than seizing territory, especially regarding AS. The militant group has repeatedly shown itself to be deeply adaptive to pressure, able to retreat and regroup before hitting back. Before further operations in southern Somalia, the FGS and its partners should work to consolidate gains in central Somalia. An overstretched Somali National Army as African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) forces gradually draw down could be disastrous on several fronts. Particularly as the much-heralded ‘Operation Black Lion,’ made up of Kenyan, Ethiopian, and Djiboutian forces, is yet to appear. To prevent the SNA and regional forces from fighting rearguard actions as it attempts to press on in southern Somalia, it should double down on attempts to stabilise and reconcile liberated territory in central Somalia.
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
'Give Peace a Chance' was the title of a 1969 single written by John Lennon, recorded during his famous honeymoon 'bed-in' with Yoko Ono. Capturing the counterculture sentiments of the time, it was adopted as an anthem of the anti-Vietnam War movement in the following decade. Thirty years later, a provocative inversion of the title-- 'Give War a Chance'-- was adopted in a well-known Foreign Affairs article by Edward Luttwak in 1999, in which he argued that humanitarian interventions or premature negotiations can freeze conflict, resulting in endless, recurring war. Luttwak contended that war has an internal logic, and if allowed to 'run its course', can bring about a more durable peace.