Tax Reform and Nation-Building
In 2022, the Hiraal Institute, a Mogadishu-based think tank, released a report saying that Al-Shabaab collected almost as much in taxes as the government of Somalia. Based on interviews with 70 Somali businessmen, government officials, members and ex-members of Al-Shabaab, the insurgent tax collectors were bringing in USD 15 million per month. Today, Somalia’s tax revenue stands at 4.4 percent of its GDP, the lowest tax revenue in Africa.
Re-building Somalia after decades of conflict takes money. Somalia cannot counter its endemic fragility, enhance government legitimacy or deliver critical public services to the Somali people without adequate resources. But mobilizing domestic resources in such a fragile, conflict-ridden environment is a formidable challenge.
The news is not all bad, however. For the past ten years, excluding 2020 when the Covid-19 pandemic rolled across Africa, Somalia has consistently increased its domestic revenue toward the goal a 15 percent tax to GDP ratio in the medium to long term. And last year’s election brought hope that Somalia’s new government has the political will to sustain and improve tax collection.
The Federal Government of Somalia relies heavily on nominal types of domestic revenue, including income tax, customs, property taxes, fines and penalties, and fees imposed for government services. However, taxes collected have often been known to make their way into individuals’ accounts instead of the government’s. Somalia’s progress in tax reform over the last several years includes adopting new tax policy, updates to revenue law, and improvements to revenue administration.
These reforms have increased government revenue, resulted in a more simplified tax collection process based on self-assessment, increased operational efficiency through automation, and generally contributed to state-building.
Collecting taxes is more than just generating revenue. There are three responsibilities that differentiate the state from other actors in this regard. First, the government is exclusively charged with the collection and management of taxes. In addition, the government is tasked with financing public goods and services, including security. And, finally, the central government alone possesses enforcement authority.
In a 2019 IMF study on the experiences of Cambodia, Georgia, Guyana, Liberia and Ukraine in relation to tax reform, some lessons learned are also signficant for Somalia. Georgia, for example, following the collapse of the Soviet Union, experienced many of the same problems of current-day Somalia—rampant corruption, widespread tax evasion, distrust of the tax system, illegal tax credits, and outright theft of government tax revenue. But in 2004, Georgia’s Rose Revolution presented the government with a mandate to reform its economy and fight corruption. It adopted a policy of zero tolerance of corruption. As laws changed, so did the culture.
What can Georgia’s successful tax reform experience teach Somalia?
The necessity of a clear mandate. A government with a clear mandate to reform taxes can succeed. In the case of Somalia, the new president still enjoys the support and goodwill of his people. Fulfillment of his promise to transform Somalia into a country at peace with itself and the world depends on a functioning government that can provide its people with the public services that were denied to them for decades. The collection of taxes binds the government and its citizens together in a social contract, a prerequisite for successful nation-building.
The need for high-level political commitment to and buy-in from all stakeholders. A mandate is not enough. The government must effectively make its case to both regional and local leaders and its people.
Success also requires a simplified tax system. Especially in fragile states, a simplified tax system fosters compliance in an environment of still-weak institutions.
Management, governance and human resources are key. Tax offices should employ Somalia’s best and brightest talent, and Somalia’s youth need employment. The government should invest in education and training of the next generation of tax collectors and administrators.
Management information systems are also essential. Automated systems help prevent corruption. The government must invest in automated systems, and train youth in information technology to run them.
Tax reform has the potential to generate critical resources for Somalia, and to transform the relationship between the state and its people. By building a fair and transparent system of tax collection, the Federal Government of Somalia can begin to re-establish its social contract with the Somali people.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.