Dam breaks on Somalia and ‘GERD conspiracy’
The president of the Somali Regional State (SRS) of Ethiopia, Mustafa Omer ‘Cagjar,’ wove a grand conspiracy theory on Amharic TV and radio channels this week. He claimed that Somalia, Egypt and Al-Shabaab were working together to undermine Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance Dam (GERD). The outlandish comments, which came in the wake of Al-Shabaab’s attack in his region, have caused consternation in the Horn, to no surprise. They reflect the growing desperation of the beleaguered Somali regional leader. Cagjar has recently lost two pillars of support that kept his regime artificially alive: Somalia’s former President Mohammed Abdullahi Farmaajo; and Farmaajo’s intelligence chief Fahad Yasin. The recent Al-Shabaab incursion has made the situation even graver.
Mustafa Cagjar was speaking to a specific audience that relishes bashing Egypt and is wont to believe any claim that paints Cairo as a malign actor in the Horn. The idea of Egypt working with the Somali militant group Al-Shabaab to destabilise Ethiopia adds another dimension to the conspiracy. Unfortunately, some gullible Ethiopians, especially far right nationalists conditioned to believe the worst about Egypt, are almost certain to imbibe this latest narrative and give it wings.
Earlier this week, Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) returned from a two-day trip to Cairo. At the end of his visit a communique was issued that, in Arabic, contained reference to the two nations’ ‘common understanding’ on the GERD. This is a standard phrase familiar to foreign officials visiting Egypt. Egypt views most relations with the Horn and East Africa through the prism of the Nile and the politics of the GERD. It would be unusual if a communique were issued without any reference to the GERD.
Egypt views Somalia as crucial to its overall Horn of Africa strategy. Historically Somalia was perceived as a key element in Cairo’s military strategy to ‘encircle’ Ethiopia. This strategy assumed that Egypt would, in a conflict situation, move military assets along the Red Sea to Somalia, within striking distance of Ethiopia.
The last five years, under the Farmaajo regime, saw a dramatic deterioration in relations between Somalia and Egypt, however. Cairo and Mogadishu were on opposite sides of Gulf rivalries. Egypt had become part of the Saudi-Emirati axis, while Somalia had moved into the Qatar-Turkey axis. Perhaps for this reason it is best to view Hassan Sheikh’s visit to Cairo at this early stage in his presidency as largely symbolic, designed to demonstrate that the new Somali administration wants to repair relations.
The former Somali spy chief Fahad Yasin posted a message on Somali social media that makes the same allegations that Cagjar has made. But Yasin has gone a bit further. He alleges that Al-Shabaab and Ethiopia’s Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) had a compact that prevented the Somali militants from crossing the border and conducting attacks within Ethiopia. Yasin produced no evidence to support his claims. The notion that the jihadists could have cut a deal with the TPLF, the dominant member of the former Ethiopian ruling coalition the EPRDF, flies in the face of reality.
In the 1990s Ethiopia fought off the militant group Al-Ittihad al-Islami in north central Somalia. In December 2006 Ethiopia invaded Somalia in a bid to crush the Islamic Courts Union (ICU) that was then in control of Mogadishu. Former Prime Minister Meles Zenawi and his government saw Islamism as an existential threat to Ethiopia. The idea that the TPLF saw Al-Shabaab as potential allies to be harnessed to undertake operations anywhere is frankly laughable.
The object of the new propaganda campaign being waged by the defeated Farmaajo party and its regional support network against the new HSM administration is neither about accuracy nor historical revisionism. Their ambition is simply to generate a social media feeding frenzy over false allegations and control the narrative about HSM’s visit to Cairo.
Mustafa, Yasin and the Nabad iyo Nolol (the ex-governing party) simply want to foil a closer working relationship between Addis and Mogadishu. And a climate of crisis in bilateral relations allows Mustafa to maintain his grip on the Somali region of Ethiopia. HSM invited the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) leadership to his inauguration; this gave its leaders greater visibility, as well as opportunities for high-profile meetings. As interpreted back in Jijiga, this was a signal that HSM’s government might favour regime change in the Somali regional state.
Two weeks ago, the Somali president attempted to visit Addis Ababa. He was scheduled to visit Addis after his visit to Djibouti, but his team was informed that Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed was not available for a meeting. The reason put forward was technical, a scheduling conflict. But was Abiy’s unavailability meant to be a political message of some kind, perhaps implying some displeasure with HSM’s early foreign policy moves?
HSM’s trip to Cairo should not be seen as an attempt by Mogadishu to spite Abiy. Ironically, Somalia and Ethiopia have cause for anger and wrangling. Abiy might overplay the meaning of HSM’s Cairo visit and frame it as hostile toward Ethiopia. HSM might interpret both Abiy’s unavailability and the conspiratorial narrative of Mustafa Cagjar as intentions to pursue hostile policies toward Somalia.
The HSM administration may find it beneficial to open quick communications with Addis to set the record straight.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
I stand before you today with profound respect and appreciation for the sacrifices the sons and daughters of your countries have made in the AMISOM/ATMIS/AUSSOM missions to help their African brothers and sisters in Somalia fight the scourge of Al-Shabaab, open and maintain critical trade routes, and help in the state-building process of Somalia.
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.