Deceit and deflection: Eritrean forces in Tigray
On 28 February, the Eritrean regime publicly admitted for the first time that its army is still present in Ethiopia's northern Tigray region. In an extraordinary statement by the Eritrean Embassy to the United Kingdom and Ireland, the embassy lashed out at alleged "hired lobbyists" of the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) for "regurgitating revisionist narratives on the war." Among these narratives perpetuated by unspecified articles in "The Statesman; Gray Dynamics; World Peace Foundation," the embassy claimed that these lobbyists have falsely accused Eritrean troops of occupying parts of Tigray.
Instead, the embassy falsely asserted that Eritrean forces were stationed solely within the country's sovereign territory and in line with the Algiers Agreement in 2000 that concluded the Eritrean-Ethiopian 1998-2000 war. The Algiers Agreement established a Boundary Commission to demarcate the Eritrean-Ethiopian border, which eventually, and contentiously, awarded the currently Eritrean-occupied town of Badme to Asmara, among other border areas.
The embassy's claim that Eritrean troops are solely stationed on Eritrean land and not in Ethiopia is demonstrably false. The brutal and continued occupation of swathes of Tigray by Eritrean forces goes well beyond the territories awarded by the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission; areas that Ethiopia still administered. Rather, the embassy's statement is another attempt to mask the ongoing human rights violations being committed by Eritrea's army over 15 months from the signing of the Pretoria agreement in November 2022. Nor does the Algiers Agreement provide any sort of justification for the extreme violence that Eritrean forces have committed.
Civil society organisations have documented Eritrean full or partial occupation of multiple Tigray districts, including, but not limited to, Zalambesa, Addis Tesfa, and Addis Alem in the Eastern Zone. Eritrean troops have also been reported post-Pretoria in districts such as Rural Badme, Badme Town, and Gemhalo in the North Western Zone, as well as Erdi Genanu, Hoya Medeb, and Kushet Egri Sebeya in the Central Zone.
Numerous credible reports from international organisations, humanitarian agencies, and independent journalists have further corroborated the presence of Eritrean troops in Tigray. Satellite imagery has also captured Eritrean military convoys crossing the border into Tigray. One recent aid memo on 31 January, based on United Nations agency assessments of two Tigray sub-districts near the Eritrean border, documented both recent abductions and systematic looting by Eritrean soldiers. In one incident on 22 January, 8 herders were seized by soldiers, along with their livestock. In early December, multiple incidents were reported of Eritrean forces stealing dozens of animals from Tigrayan civilians.
These two sub-districts, Shimblina and Ademeyti, are just the tip of the iceberg, however. Since the conclusion of the destructive Tigray war, Eritrean forces have continued their campaign of sexual violence, looting, and violence against Tigrayan civilians, albeit at a reduced scale. The occupation of numerous districts has further compounded the humanitarian and starvation crisis currently engulfing Tigray. Eritrean forces have been documented denying critical humanitarian aid from reaching communities under their control, as well as refusing to allow displaced individuals to return and cultivate their fallow fields. The leaked aid memo reports that at least 50 people have subsequently died of starvation in Shimblina and Ademeyti.
Eritrea's Information Minister, Yemane Gebremeskel, has refuted these and similar reports. So did Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki when he downplayed reports of Eritrean forces committing human rights violations in February 2023. While calling the reports "nonsense" to media in Nairobi, Isaias tellingly asked why the reporter was "bothered about Eritrean troops who are there or not there, who come out or do not come out." The presence of non-Ethiopian National Defence Forces (ENDF) in Tigray is a direct contravention of the Pretoria agreement, the fragile Cessation of Hostilities Agreement that the Eritrean regime has worked to undermine.
The Eritrean embassy's recent statement is part of a decades-long pattern of violence followed by denial and obfuscation from Asmara, not just in Tigray but within its own borders as well. During the Tigray war, Eritrean forces were responsible for many of the most heinous human rights violations. The Axum massacre, where hundreds of civilians were executed on 28-29 November 2020, was carried out by the Eritrean Defence Forces (EDF). Throughout the conflict, sexual violence was used as a weapon of war by the EDF to target Tigrayan women and girls, and there are reports of women still being held in sexual slavery in Eritrean-occupied areas. There are Tigrayan children being taught an Eritrean curriculum in grades 5-8 where their fate will likely be to join sawa, Eritrea's indefinite military conscription. Other war crimes, including torture and ethnic cleansing, were also committed-- with little suggestion of any legal recourse or justice for the EDF's many victims on the horizon. The countless first-hand testimonies are harrowing and should dispel any doubts about Eritrea's close involvement in the conflict, as well as their ongoing attempts to spoil the tentative truce today.
The Eritrean embassy's statement should be disregarded out of hand. The regime's history of dubious territorial disputes, military aggression, and destabilisation of its neighbours make it a dubious witness to its own involvement in Tigray. What should not be ignored, though, is the ongoing contravention of the Pretoria agreement and human rights violations by the EDF. Crucial mediated talks are continuing between the Tigray Interim Administration and the federal government in the presence of African Union officials to resolve the flawed implementation of the Pretoria agreement. High on the agenda in these discussions will surely be Eritrea's occupation of Tigray territory, which continues to curtail the effective administration of Tigray. Removing the EDF presence will be challenging, but Eritrea's military presence on Tigray and Ethiopian soil cannot continue.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.