Fano Factions and their Consolidation
Armed conflict has raged across much of the Amhara region since August 2023, when low-level clashes between the federal government and 'Fano' militia erupted into widespread violence. While the Ethiopian National Defence Forces (ENDF) have since re-established control of the region's major urban centres, several Fano factions continue to pose a significant security threat. With little end to the insurgency in sight and with reports that Fano factions in Gojam and elsewhere have begun to coalesce, where might this brutal insurgency and counter-insurgency lead?
Since the New Year, Fano militias have persisted in targeting ENDF convoys and positions on key highways in the Amhara region, hindering supply lines and movement from Bahir Dar. Several towns have also seen intense, sporadic fighting between government forces and Fano militia in recent weeks, including Debre Birhan and Gondar. Most of the clashes, however, have taken place in rural Amhara, particularly in Wollo, North Shewa, and Gojam districts. Despite the occasional Fano intrusion, a degree of normalcy has returned to the major cities in Amhara. Public universities have re-opened, and three-wheeled Bajaj vehicles, intermittently banned for several months, are working freely again.
But in the last months of 2023, having established footholds in much of rural Amhara, influential Fano divisions began clarifying their historically decentralised command structure. Gojam, Wollo, and eastern Amhara Fano have all selected commanders, with negotiations among the disparate Gondar Fano units also reportedly ongoing. Efforts by a committee to merge the estimated 16 Gondar Fano units under a single command will likely prove more challenging, however. Following each significant consolidation of Fano factions, an increase in violence targeting federal forces soon followed.
The advantages of unifying military command are clear; most importantly, it allows for longer-term, more strategic application of resources and personnel. While elements of Fano's campaign enjoy popular support, its decentralised nature has hindered its ability to compete with the ENDF in Amhara's major cities. There is also a wide variation in the competency and level of extremism of different factions, with some primarily made up of frustrated young men with little military training and others comprised of Eritrean-armed and trained former soldiers. This variation has also been expressed in the nature of their insurgent tactics, exemplified in late November 2023 by one Fano branch bombing 5 private schools in Bahir Dar that Prosperity Party officials' children attended.
As elements of the Amhara nationalist movement transition from a nearly entirely decentralised insurgency towards a multi-polar, interconnected set of units, it offers both risk and reward for the insurgent group. The multiple iterations of Fano have arguably survived because of their lack of a single leader. For instance, the death of Asaminew Tsige, the general who recruited Amhara nationalists under his command in the Amhara Special Forces (ASF), did not spell an end to the movement. Moreover, the imprisonment of dozens of Amhara leaders and Fano militia in 2022 and 2023 played a role in splintering Fano but did not subdue its growing support. Decentralised command-and-control, while making urban takeover more complex, feeds into asymmetric warfare and potentially complicates counter-insurgency efforts as the battlefield is fragmented.
A more centralised military command structure does not suggest, however, that a unified political platform will necessarily follow. The multiple iterations of Fano across Amhara have expressed various overlapping and loosely connected demands, ranging from those frustrated by a stagnant regional economy to former ASF soldiers involved in violence against Tigray during the war. And Fano has provided a platform onto which many Amhara have projected their frustrations about the perceived underdevelopment of their region, as well as diaspora-based groups agitating against the so-called Amhara genocide. Anti-Oromo conspiracy theories and anti-Tigrayan rhetoric continue to prosper online, supported by prominent Amhara-owned media outlets.
The lack of clear political positioning by Fano and the grip its more extreme elements hold on its most influential factions will likely complicate future attempts at dialogue or negotiation between the federal government and the myriad forces. The Debre Berhan Fano faction operating near the constitutionally established Tigray border is certain to be more incensed over historical land grievances about Wolqait and the future of Western Tigray than Fano factions in Eastern Amhara. Farmers who have agitated over crops failing due to drought and lack of fertiliser are also certain to hold different demands than established factions that forged close ties with Eritrea and sustained themselves by exploiting a brutal war economy between 2020 and 2022 in Tigray.
Nevertheless, the federal government should pursue negotiations with Fano factions that express reasonable demands. Identifying these demands and disaggregating them from Fano factions that pose the risk of spoiling future talks is critical to restoring a semblance of stability to swathes of rural Amhara. Supporting predominantly rural Amhara society with fertiliser and seeds, and facilitating the reconstruction of parts of the region destroyed in combat, would make a good start. But relying solely on counter-insurgency tactics is likely to further embolden the most extreme elements of Fano, as civilian casualties continue to rise and Fano factions continue to coalesce.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.