Famine looms in Tigray
Over a year has passed since the signing of the Pretoria agreement, yet the humanitarian situation in Tigray is rapidly deteriorating as famine takes hold. The displaced and rural population across the region, particularly in central and eastern Tigray, is almost uniformly facing immense hunger due to a confluence of the suspension of international food aid, poor harvest and drought, and the systematic destruction of food infrastructure during the Tigray War.
International and domestic reaction has been largely muted. There appears to be an unwillingness to acknowledge the scale of the damage inflicted by the 'pause' in humanitarian aid from May 2023 by USAID and the World Food Programme (WFP). Thousands of people have since starved to death, and thousands more are expected to die in the coming weeks. While the tragedy unfurling in Tigray was predictable, a plentiful harvest could have staved off some of the hunger. Instead locust swarms and drought ended these hopes. In the Eastern zone, the punishing drought has seen entire rivers dry up; dozens died in districts like Atsbi and Abergele in November and December, usually a time of plenty.
Food aid was meant to have resumed region-wide by this time, except in occupied areas, but reports suggest there has been little aid delivery outside of Mekelle to date. The TIA has said that USAID's new case load in Tigray will be only 20% of its pre-suspension level. While USAID has not yet confirmed this, and details surrounding the 20% are murky, it is nonetheless a deeply alarming figure.
Negotiations over reforms to aid delivery dragged on for months as the federal government delayed, eventually landing on a compromise that may end up being unworkable in Tigray. USAID has insisted that aid distribution must now be carried out with no government input, including at the most local level. However, officials at the lower administrative levels in Tigray, below the woreda (district), were not been implicated in the theft of aid. They are integral to their communities, including effectively identifying who is most in need of aid within them.
Many of Tigray's most extreme areas of starvation are hours of walking from the nearest asphalt roads; aid distributors will surely require guidance to locate them. There is also a gaping lack of data about the variation between the pockets of starvation in Tigray from village to village. However, according to Joint Emergency Operation Programme data from October, the Irob, Adwa, Adet, and Atsbi districts are all experiencing 60% or higher child malnutrition – well above rates indicative of famine.
Some communities may be able to stave off starvation for a short time, but many more need immediate support, some of which is unlikely to arrive. While the consequences of starvation and malnutrition are well-known, the long-term economic and social consequences of asset loss are less often considered. Households are being forced to strip their homes, including remaining livestock, for cash to buy food at inflated prices.
The domestic and international response has been lacklustre. The TIA was forced to allocate ETB 50 million from its limited budget to some of the most vulnerable citizens in cash aid due to the immediacy of the problem. The federal government disaster agency has also offered several million in USD. Meanwhile, USAID and the WFP are not the only humanitarian agencies that have scaled down operations in Tigray, despite the escalating crisis. Armed conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza continue to pull the attention and funding of multilateral institutions and humanitarian organisations away from Tigray.
The WFP and USAID have barely commented on the humanitarian situation since they suspended aid to Tigray in late April. Yes, measures needed to be taken to prevent the misappropriation of food aid, but their extreme response has compounded the suffering of innocent people. Moreover, their refusal to publish internal reports that led to the suspension of aid has generated deep suspicion of these organisations in Tigray. Particularly disturbing is the drop in critical nutritional supplements for the most vulnerable children and mothers in Tigray that they had promised to sustain.
More specific data is now urgently needed. Precise figures on the most recent harvest, which communities are most in need of food aid, and the scale of sales of personal belongings and livestock can all help formulate an adequate emergency response. The tragic reality is that this could all be too little, too late. The demand is too high and the current capacity too low; it is even unclear whether enough transport capacity exists to truck aid to those who need it.
The failings of a variety of actors have led us to this point in Ethiopia. The consequences of the devastating Tigray War continue to roll on with little reconstruction in sight and with western Tigray, one of the most fertile areas of production in northern Ethiopia, still embargoed. The deeply corrupt aid management system at the regional and federal levels saw the theft of huge quantities of aid intended for starving communities. And there has been a clear unwillingness of the international community to push for the full implementation of the Pretoria agreement, instead preferring to normalise relations with Addis. While the situation is particularly dire in Tigray, other states, particularly Amhara and pastoral communities in Oromia and the Somali region, are also facing rapidly rising malnutrition and starvation. Thousands of Ethiopian citizens are now dying at a rate not seen in nearly 40 years.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.