The High Cost of Ignoring Crisis in Ethiopia: Oromia
Ethiopia has been ambling from one crisis to another. The conflict in Oromia has grown deadlier. Human Rights Watch (HRW), Amnesty International (AI) and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) have been regularly reporting that government security forces and non-state armed groups operating in Oromia, specifically in the Welega region, have committed egregious human rights violations. These have included extra judicial execution, arbitrary arrests and detentions, rape and other forms of sexual violence, and the burning of homes, farms and crops. The region has been under military administration since early 2019, ostensibly to conduct counter-insurgency operations against the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA). Thus far, command post rule has only succeeded in furthering human tragedy.
In October 2023, OCHA issued the final report of the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (ICHREE). While Tigray was the main focus, the report also documented human rights violations and indiscriminate violence against civilians in Oromia. And ICHREE issued a blunt warning that the commissioners found strong evidence indicating the likelihood of further atrocities being committed in Oromia and other regions.
In September 2023, the Centre for Development and Capacity Building (CDCB), a local think tank supported by USAID, had issued a policy brief underscoring the human tragedy unfolding in Oromia. According to that report, ongoing conflict in Oromia has led to the destruction of lives and livelihoods, the disintegration of social norms and social cohesion, the displacement of populations, and the collapse of institutions and communities. Thousands of children are now orphaned, and local communities are exposed to robbery, gender-based violence and physical injury. The region’s administrative structure is disintegrating.
This conflict and its repercussions have produced an estimated 1.3 million displaced persons in Oromia, of which nearly one million are in the East Welega, Qelem Welega, West Welega, and Horo-Guduru zones. About one third of those displaced are now living in shelters. The rest have dispersed among already-distressed host communities, which are themselves in need of assistance.
Conflict and displacement have created severe food scarcity and hunger in Oromia. Prevented by impossible conflict-induced circumstances, some farmers have not planted or harvested crops for years. Private initiatives that responded to drought-induced hunger in Borena last year have not been mobilized, perhaps suspecting reports of food shortages in what many consider a land of plenty. Meanwhile, children, the elderly and other vulnerable groups have been suffering from extreme hunger. The severity of this situation started to sink in after pictures of malnourished mothers and children began circulating on social media. Prosperity Party officials had dismissed reports of hunger saying they were intended to undermine the good news that Ethiopia was exporting surplus wheat. When reality could no longer be ignored, they blamed the OLA for the armed conflict that has led to food crisis.
Hunger has been followed by malaria and cholera outbreaks. Malaria had been kept in check for many years by spraying chemicals in mosquito breeding river valleys. But for the past 5 years, the federal government has discontinued this practice, citing armed conflict in these areas. This has led to the resurgence of malaria-infected mosquitoes. Malaria has exacerbated existing public health problems, including acute malnutrition and anaemia. The presence of large numbers of displaced persons and the disruption of regular patterns of everyday life have also created fertile ground for cholera.
Data obtained from the local Oromia Health Bureau, UN OCHA, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the Oromia Physicians Association (OPA) show western Oromia is the site of humanitarian disaster. OCHA reported in January 2023 that 750,000 malaria cases had been registered and hundreds had died in West Welega and Qelem Welega zones. While all the districts in West Welega, East Welega, Qelem Welega and Horo Guduru have been affected, Qondala and Begi in West Welega have been hardest hit.
Oromia cannot cope with this level of crisis. Since 2019, command post rule has weakened the region, blocking the movement of people, and the delivery of essential supplies and basic services. According to the CDCB report, quoting the Oromia Health Bureau, thousands of health facilities have been damaged or destroyed. Ambulances and health-delivery vehicles have been stolen, burned and otherwise damaged, hampering the distribution of medical care and supplies.
Just a few years ago, malaria did not mean imminent death in Ethiopia. But escalating armed conflict and concomitant insecurity have since crippled economic activities in Oromia and other regions, rendering residents unable to pay the USD 45 (ETB 45,000) needed to purchase malaria treatment. Conflict-induced poverty has increased the ranks of the unemployed, further deteriorating the capacity of households to cope with ever-mounting challenges.
This dire situation is a microcosm of larger Ethiopia. As Professor Alex de Waal has described, “the crisis [in Ethiopia] is a failing state and a disintegrating empire-nation.’ The international community cannot stand by and watch as Ethiopia drifts from crisis to crisis.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.