Tigray’s Troubled Transition
On 7 September, police in Mekelle, Tigray’s regional capital, violently dispersed a peaceful protest organised by a new opposition coalition, the ‘Alliance for Radical Change.’ The crackdown, which left dozens injured, triggered a howl of protest from many Tigrayans and condemnation from Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. Close to 30 protest leaders were arrested, among them senior officials of the Tigray Independent Party (TIP), Salsay Weyane Tigray (SeWaT) and the National Congress of Great Tigray (Baytona).
The three parties organised the march to protest against what they called the “authoritarian tendency” of the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) and its “ineptitude” in managing the transition from war to peace. They accused the interim administration of failing to deliver on the Pretoria agreement, and demanded the setting up of a new inclusive national government in Tigray.
For many, the protest was also to highlight the crises plaguing the region since the conclusion of fighting in November 2022. Despite the Pretoria agreement’s stipulation that all non-Ethiopian National Defence Force (ENDF) forces must withdraw, western and parts of northern Tigray are still occupied by Amhara militia and Eritrean forces. They have continued a brutal campaign of ethnic cleansing, displacing thousands more Tigrayans into overcrowded and underfunded internally displaced person (IDP) camps. The suspension of international food aid to the region since April has also compounded an already dire humanitarian crisis. Between the suspension and mid-August, at least 1,400 people starved to death.
Police declared the rally could not proceed, citing a lack of adequate personnel to ensure safety. Organisers defied the directive and proceeded with their rally. Mekelle’s police subsequently moved against the marchers before they made it to Romanat Square, arresting the ringleaders and beating others with batons. Several opposition leaders are still being detained despite a court order on 8 September demanding their release. Following the incident, President of Tigray’s Interim Administration (TIA) Getachew Reda accused the opposition parties of fomenting instability and denied claims the administration was intent on stifling dissent.
The violent crackdown on protesters does not cast the TPLF in a positive light. It is simplistic, however, to see the incident as simply a manifestation of the TPLF’s alleged authoritarian impulse to crush a burgeoning democratic opposition. Tigray has never been a monolithic state, and there remains a diversity of political views within the region. But fraying peace and widespread social discontent are stoking polarisation and adversarial politics.
In February 2023, the three opposition parties objected to the process of selecting members of the interim administration. They accused General Worede Tadese’s committee that established the interim administration of sidelining the opposition, and instead favouring the TPLF. The opposition parties further claim the current administrative set-up flouts Article 10 of the Pretoria agreement, which envisages “inclusive” regional administration “settled through political dialogue between the parties.”
The 27-member cabinet appointed in April is undoubtedly dominated by the TPLF, even though an attempt was made to bring in some opposition members. The aim of the interim administration, however, was to conduct an orderly transition rather than give the TPLF a new lease of life. The idea that the party should have ceded power in April is unrealistic. First, its leaders are signatories to the Pretoria agreement and are under direct obligation to implement the accord. Second, the TPLF was still functionally in charge of the Tigray Defence Forces, the bulk of whom have since been demobilised. Maintaining the integrity of the command by retaining some military commanders in leadership positions was a sensible measure to ensure law and order.
The Tigray War has taken a heavy toll on the TPLF, however, and the ongoing refusal to reinstate the party by the National Election Board of Ethiopia has thrown its future into question. But while its brand is arguably less appealing, it still has no high-profile political competitor in the region. This is not an argument for TPLF to continue to exert political hegemony; rather, an acknowledgement that it has the responsibility to deliver on the peace and manage an orderly transition to a more inclusive political settlement.
Any draconian crackdown or monopolisation of power would be a grave mistake. The TPLF remains Tigray’s most influential party and owes a traumatised region, at the very least, politics of empathy and accommodation, not coercion. The images of Tigray in conflict with itself are deeply troubling after the horrors of the Tigray War. Reconciliation and compromise must be the priority for Tigray to navigate its numerous humanitarian and political crises. Freeing all detained opposition leaders and opening discussions with the discontented parties would be an important signal of the TPLF's commitment to a more pluralist political settlement. Greater discontent is something the region can ill afford at this critical juncture.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.
Last week, a bombshell Wall Street Journal article revealed that Washington was exploring a reset in relations with Eritrea, with US envoy for Africa Massad Boulos having met privately with senior regime officials in Egypt. Any normalisation of ties now appears to be on ice, with the reaction to Boulos's meetings — facilitated by Egypt — having been met with short shrift. But the episode speaks to broader issues about American foreign policy in the Horn and the accelerating reconfiguration of the Red Sea political order, which will not go away simply because this particular overture may have stalled.
Last weekend, the Murusade, a major sub-clan of the powerful Hawiye clan family, staged one of the largest and most colourful coronations of a clan chief in recent memory in Mogadishu. The caleemasarka (enthronement) of Ugaas Abdirizaq Ugaas Abdullahi Ugaas Haashi, the new Ugaas or sultan of the Murusade, was attended by thousands of delegates from all parts of Somalia. Conducted next to the imposing and magnificent Ottomanesque Ali Jim'ale Mosque, on the Muslim day of rest, Friday, the occasion blended the Islamic, the regal and the customary; a restatement of an ancient tradition very much alive and vibrant.
With all eyes trained on the Strait of Hormuz blockades and their geopolitical convulsions, discussions and concerns, too, have risen about the perils of other globalised chokepoints, not least the Bab al-Mandab. The threats to the stability of the Bab al-Mandab, the Gulf of Aden, and the Red Sea may not arise principally from the escalatory logic that the US, Iran, and Israel have been locked in, but the threats posed from collapse and contested sovereignty offer little relief. Off Somalia's northern coastline in particular, it is transnational criminal networks — expressed in smuggling, piracy, and, less visibly but no less consequentially, illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing — that define the character of offshore insecurity. It is this last phenomenon that provides the foundation on which much of Somalia's maritime disorder is built, and which remains the most consistently neglected.
In the past months, a number of unsettling images and videos have emerged from the Russian frontlines in the Ukraine war. Within the horrors of the grinding "kill zone," where kamikaze drones strafe the sky for any signs of movement, yet another concerning dimension has emerged—the use of African recruits by Moscow in the conflict, often under false pretences. Particularly drawn from Kenya, many reportedly believed they were signing contracts to work as drivers or security guards, only to be shipped to the front lines upon arrival. Such activities are illustrative of several issues, including Russia's relationship with countries in the Horn of Africa, one shaped more by opportunistic realpolitik than genuine partnership.
Villa Somalia's triumph in Baidoa may yet turn to ashes. Since the ousting of wary friend-turned-foe, Abdiaziz Laftagareen, in late March, the federal government has ploughed ahead with preparations for state- and district-level elections in South West. Nominally scheduled for next week, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has chosen to reward his stalwart parliamentary ally, Aden Madoobe from the Rahanweyne/Hadaamo, with the regional presidency after some vacillation, naming him the sole Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP) candidate
Another showdown over Tigray's political architecture is unfolding, with the future of the Tigray Interim Administration (TIA) once again at stake. For much of this year, fears of renewed war have loomed over Ethiopia's northernmost region, with the federal government mobilising substantial forces to the edges of Tigray.
In Act III, Scene I of William Shakespeare's tragedy Coriolanus, the tribune Sicinius addresses the gathered representatives and, rejecting the disdain the titular character displays towards plebeians, defends them, stating, "What is the city but the people?" Capturing the struggle between the elite and the masses of ancient Rome, the line has remained politically resonant for centuries--emphasising that a city, democracy, and state rely on the people, not just their leader. Or perhaps, not just its buildings. It is a lesson missed by Villa Somalia, though, with the twilight weeks of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's term in office — at least, constitutionally — dominated by the government's twin campaigns in the capital: land clearances and the militarisation of Mogadishu.
On Tuesday, 14 April, the four-year term of Somalia's federal parliament ended, or rather, it didn't. Villa Somalia's (un)constitutional coup of a year-long term extension for the parliament and president in March remains in effect, leaving the institution in a kind of lingering zombie statehood. It is perhaps a fitting denouement for the 11th parliament, whose degeneration has been so thorough that its formal expiration means little in practice.