Saudi Arabia’s Policy of Lethal Counter-Migration
Yesterday, 21 August, the human rights organisation Human Rights Watch (HRW) published a shocking 73-page report. Detailing the systematic use of lethal force by Saudi border guards to deter Ethiopian migrants on its Yemeni border, it revealed that in the last year alone, some 655 migrants may have been killed.
The report, titled ‘They Fired on Us Like Rain,’ makes for grim reading. Saudi border guards have used live ammunition at close range and heavy weapons, including explosives, to kill and deter migrants attempting to enter the Kingdom from Yemen. Children were not spared.
Saudi authorities have denied the claims, previously using the conflict in Yemen as justification for heavy-handed policing of its border. They have claimed Houthi rebels control the border and allow migrants through in an attempt to weaponise migration. HRW’s report, however, has debunked this dubious claim and revealed the scale of the border guards' deliberate violence.
There are an estimated 750,000 Ethiopian migrants in the Gulf state, largely undocumented. Women typically serve in the domestic sector, with men working in Saudi Arabia's vast construction industry. Authoritarian tactics to deter migrants are not new. In recent years, thousands of migrants have been detained in internment centres in Saudi Arabia in deplorable conditions, with some even starving to death. Saudi authorities regularly deport Ethiopians, a routine source of friction between Addis Ababa and Riyadh.
Two major migration routes are typically used by Ethiopian refugees and migrants– through Moyale city on the Oromia and Somali region border, Nairobi and onto Southern Africa. The other runs through Somaliland, Puntland and across the Gulf of Aden. The latter is deeply treacherous, with frequent deaths off the Yemeni coast. Just a few days ago, on 17 August, a boat sank near the coastal town of Obock in north-east Djibouti. Twenty-six people have been rescued, but dozens are still missing and are feared dead.
Like much of the rapid construction of the Gulf, MBS’s modernisation relies on cheap foreign labour. And much like other Gulf states, there is little protection for these workers in Saudi Arabia’s largely unregulated labour market. Thousands of quasi-legitimate ‘agencies’ act as brokers to deliver workers on massive construction projects. These middlemen care only about their profit and often use a variety of underhanded tactics to trap labourers in indentured servitude.
MBS is also rebuilding Saudi Arabia’s image abroad, seeking to expand its soft power. Through Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), the Kingdom has set upon a concerted campaign of ‘sports washing.’ Vast funds have been invested in golf, boxing, and football to endear the regime to western audiences. It has had some visible success. Saudi headdresses known as ‘ghutrah’ are now on regular display at St. James Park, the stadium of Newcastle Football Club that PIF bought in 2021.
Saudi Arabia was edging towards becoming an international pariah among many western countries just a few years ago. Fury at the assassination of journalist Jamal Khashoggi on Turkish soil, and the vast destruction in Yemen had partially sidelined the Gulf state. US President Joe Biden famously swore to make the Kingdom a “pariah” as a candidate in the 2020 Presidential Election. Less than three weeks after being sworn into office, Biden suspended a swathe of US weapons sales to the Kingdom.
Today, the situation could not be more different. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has also thrown the Kingdom into fresh diplomatic light, with its vast supply of petroleum. Biden was forced to travel to the Gulf state in July 2022 in a bid to repair US-Saudi relations, hoping Saudi Arabia might release some to counter steeply rising prices. The rapprochement has not been straightforward, particularly with the surprise of the Chinese-mediated reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia. The Biden administration, however, is now reportedly considering a new security pact with Saudi Arabia in the hope that it might bring Israel and the Gulf state together.
The harsh realities on its border and the image Saudi Arabia projects could not be starker. But it is also the tragic reality of the failures of state-building and development that is driving millions of migrants and refugees across the world towards the hope of a better future. To be killed on the doorstep of that hope is particularly heart-wrenching.
These migrations and refugee flows will only increase as the climate crisis intensifies. And these deaths fit into a wider pattern of danger facing migrants from the Darien Gap to the Mediterranean. It is yet to be seen whether these grim revelations on the Saudi border impact western policy towards the Gulf state, but it should serve as a brutal reminder of what faces migrants worldwide. Greater scrutiny along treacherous borders, and on the dangerous routes migrants are forced to navigate, is needed immediately to prevent future tragedies and crimes from occurring. Prosecuting those responsible must now happen in an open court, not merely a few token arrests and prosecutions.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.