No justice for women in Tigray
The population of Tigray has faced unimaginable suffering since the outbreak of conflict in November 2020. During the Tigray War, women and girls bore the brunt of many of the crimes committed by Eritrean, Ethiopian, and Amhara forces, with systemic sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) used as a weapon of war. While the fighting has subsided since the Pretoria agreement in November 2022, there has been little accountability. The situation remains dire for many survivors, and the challenges facing them demand immediate attention.
The Tigray War saw thousands of harrowing cases of women and girls being subjected to sexual violence, torture, and exploitation. A partial investigation by a UN Commission into alleged human rights violations during the conflict highlighted the “staggering scale” of SGBV violence, and crimes of a “cruelty beyond comprehension.” The Commission revealed that SGBV was employed as a deliberate tactic by Eritrean forces, and others, to terrorise, degrade, and humiliate civilians. Survivors range from young, underage girls to older women. One group responsible for some of the most extreme SGBV crimes were Amhara forces, including the nationalist militia ‘Fano,’ now embroiled in yet more violence in the Amhara region. Many Tigrayan survivors said the Amhara fighters assaulted them to ‘Amharise’ them in a twisted attempt to erase their ethnic heritage. Some fighters even tortured Tigrayan women, intending to render them infertile.
Tigray’s Interim Administration's latest estimate of SGBV survivors during the conflict stands at 120,000 women and girls in the non-occupied areas of the region alone. This shocking figure does not encompass the thousands of survivors in other areas affected by the war, including the Amhara and Afar regions. It also does not include the likely thousands of survivors still in western Tigray, occupied by Amhara and Eritrean forces. And nor does it account for those still subjected to sexual enslavement. But numbers alone cannot begin to encompass the scale of suffering inflicted.
Despite the conclusion of fighting, survivors in Tigray still face immense barriers to justice and recovery. Few perpetrators have faced any consequences. This is despite Article Four of the Pretoria agreement stipulating that all parties shall “condemn any act of sexual and gender-based violence.” Although the agreement was inked on 4 November 2022, its implementation has proven challenging and lacklustre. Indeed, the very day it was signed, exactly two years after the war’s outbreak, Tigrayan women were raped by Eritrean forces in north-eastern Tigray. Tigray’s Health Bureau recorded 852 cases of sexual assaults in centres for survivors in November and December 2022. Again the true number is likely far higher. Eritrean and Amhara forces continue to occupy swathes of Tigray, and the suspension of humanitarian aid to the region since March 2023 has exacerbated dire humanitarian conditions.
SGBV survivors require immediate comprehensive support to begin their physical and emotional recovery. Among the numerous issues facing these women in Tigray is the lack of health professionals in the region. Alongside the widespread destruction of health facilities during the conflict, there are few doctors and health professionals qualified to care for victims of gender-based violence. In addition to the bodily injuries often inflicted, many survivors grapple with post-traumatic stress disorder and clinical depression, urgently needing clinical support and psychological counselling.
In December 2021, the UN Human Rights Council established the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia, a collaborative investigation with the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission. This Commission, and other accountability mechanisms, have made little progress, so far failing to adequately address the human rights violations of the war. The relative silence of many of Ethiopia’s international partners is also deeply troubling. Despite initial international pressure, any sense of urgency appears to have diminished. Relief that the intense fighting has concluded has dampened any push for genuine accountability.
This absence of accountability risks destabilising an already fragile Ethiopia. Failure to hold perpetrators accountable not only prolongs suffering but also emboldens those responsible. Fano has since replicated its campaign of displacement and violence, albiet to a lesser extent, in the Oromia and Benishangul-Gumuz regions.
In July 2023, women across Tigray rallied in demonstrations, protesting their plight alongside the occupation of western Tigray and aid suspension. They demanded justice for survivors of SGBV and called for thorough investigations into human rights violations. The protesters also called for the full implementation of the Pretoria agreement, including the withdrawal of occupying forces and the restoration of pre-conflict regional boundaries.
The dire circumstances faced by women and girls in Tigray demand swift and unified action. The international community, Ethiopian authorities, and humanitarian organisations must now collaborate to address gender-based violence, and pursue justice and a path towards healing and recovery for survivors. Bringing survivors into decision-making concerning accountability mechanisms and their own support would be an important first step. The failure to do so not only prolongs the suffering of Tigrayan women but risks compromising fundamental principles of humanity and justice.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.