Sudan at the abyss: risks for the Horn
It has now been 6 days since fighting broke out between the government’s Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan. The conflict could prove Sudan’s worst in decades; it risks plunging the country into deeper protracted civil war. It threatens to undo recent modest strides towards peace in the Horn and it threatens to draw in meddlesome regional powers.
Fighting erupted on Saturday 15 April, when paramilitary RSF units raided the Merowe Air Base in northern Sudan and seized control. The base is key to the SAF and it hosts Egyptian air force personnel and fighter jets. Under a new security agreement, Egypt can maintain a small military outpost and station some combat jets there. The raid on Merowe presented a brief propaganda victory for the RSF; pro-RSF social media saturated the Internet with footage of the ‘capture.’ The incident was designed to embarrass Egypt, dissuade involvement in support of Burhan, and provide the RSF with a bargaining chip. Instead, it ignited a civil war.
The last week has seen some of the worst urban warfare in Sudan in decades, with much of the fighting concentrated in Khartoum. The SAF has now deployed fighter jets and heavily armoured vehicles to dislodge the RSF. The latter is burrowing deeper into residential areas and deploying high-calibre machine guns and artillery from rooftops and courtyards, leading to massive civilian casualties.
A vicious urban war has begun; the death toll is mounting, now estimated at close to 300. In addition, water and electricity are erratic and, in some districts, completely unavailable. Key hospitals in the city are operating beyond their capacity and media reports suggest most have shut down. A serious humanitarian crisis is developing in Khartoum. And fighting is now spreading across Sudan. In Darfur, the stronghold of General Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo ‘Hemedti,’ the RSF is consolidating. If the SAF dislodges it from Khartoum, it can retreat to Darfur and attempt a guerrilla campaign.
The RSF has also been increasing its ties with the Russian paramilitary group ‘Wagner,’ and has reportedly been using Wagner’s communications technology in the current conflict.
The violent showdown between Hemedti and Burhan was, in fact, foreseeable. The two men have been at odds for years; they have vied for control of the military, and the state. Hemedti is best known for his infamous militia then known as the janjaweed, now known as the RSF, which wreaked havoc on Darfur. Whereas Burhan’s military government has been slowly moving Sudan through its transition to civilian authority.
Both Burhan and Hemedti are tied to geopolitical players operating under the Saudi-Emirati axis. The Emiratis and the Saudis likely prefer to deal with Burhan. Still, in a context of fluid and shifting alliances, nothing is inconceivable, as the picture of who supports who remains untidy by design.
In recent months, Hemedti has travelled extensively-- to Israel, South Sudan, Chad and Kenya, in attempts to gain support and forge alliances.
He visited Eritrea in March, almost certainly seeking some form of help from the country’s dictator Isaias Afewerki. But Eritrea had deployed significant resources and manpower in Tigray over the course of the two-year war there; its support for Hemedti, if any, will likely be limited.
Ethiopia, on the other hand, is increasingly well-positioned to return to its past role as regional leader, to provide diplomatic support for a negotiated settlement in Sudan.
Chad is another country to watch. It has stakes in Darfur and its current military leader, Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno, distrusts Hemedti. The RSF return to Darfur could also aggravate unresolved local conflicts there.
Today’s geopolitics affecting the Horn of Africa can be opportunistic and highly transactional. Regional powers tend to back the likely winner and support the status quo. Foreign actors are likely still hedging their bets in Sudan, before placing their fingers on the scale to tip it one way or the other. But this is not the way to help the people of Sudan.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Nearly a month has passed since a powerful blast destroyed the home of General Mahad, widely known as Taliye Shub, in Doolow, a political dissident who opposed the government of Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.
While Mogadishu’s elite were ensconced in the Hangar complex last week praising Turkey, berating its critics, and proclaiming a ‘New Somalia’, the country's periphery told a vastly different story - one where "old Somalia," with its deep-seated clan feuds and the brutal calculus of blood and retaliation, remained stubbornly intact.
On 5 September, Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro arrived in the United States for an informal working visit designed to launch a new diplomatic push to cement Hargeisa's rising geopolitical profile. Monitored closely both regionally and internationally, the high-stakes trip carries immense domestic expectations. It represents an ambitious diplomatic outreach by Hargeisa to Washington, capitalising on the momentum generated by Israel's formal recognition of Somaliland in December 2025. However, translating this sudden diplomatic visibility into tangible strategic prospects remains a formidable challenge.
Turkey yesterday crossed a perilous threshold in Somalia when it used its military air assets not for counterterrorism purposes but as a partisan tool in local Somali political warfare.
The Federal Government of Somalia’s (FGS) strategy to assert central authority over federal states and enforce its brand of limited plebiscite – the so-called “one-person-one-vote” (OPOV) – appears to be going awry.
Delegates from Somalia's influential Darood clan family are currently gathering in Nairobi, Kenya, for a crucial "pre-conference" planning session. Driven largely by clan chiefs, the meeting is designed to formulate a unified strategy and coordinate responses to ‘fundamental issues’ (arrimo masiiri ah) within Somalia, principally centre-periphery tensions and the future of federalism. The anticipated culmination of these talks is a comprehensive Pan-Darood congress in Garowe. This development represents a rare and significant intervention, serving as a clear indicator of accelerating political polarisation and fragmentation.
Technicians and engineers have long been familiar with a paradoxical problem: how the repair of a specific defect often triggers a secondary malfunction. "Repair-induced malfunction" is a widely recognised dilemma across technical professions, with awareness and mitigation deeply woven into standard training.
I stand before you today with profound respect and appreciation for the sacrifices the sons and daughters of your countries have made in the AMISOM/ATMIS/AUSSOM missions to help their African brothers and sisters in Somalia fight the scourge of Al-Shabaab, open and maintain critical trade routes, and help in the state-building process of Somalia.
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.