Amhara unrest and the pitfalls of disarming federal states
Plans by the Ethiopian federal government to demobilise the Amhara Special Forces (ASF) has triggered large-scale violent unrest in northern Ethiopia’s Amhara Region – by some accounts the worst in 5 years. Protests have spread to nearly all major cities in the region. Catholic Relief Services has reported that two aid workers have died in the unrest. Angry residents of towns and villages in the region have barricaded most major roads. Towns like Gondar and Bahir Dar are deserted. There have been reports of multiple heavy clashes between ASF and the Ethiopian National Defence Forces (ENDF) concentrated in the Kobo-Raya area near the border with Tigray.
The ENDF launched an operation to forcibly disarm ASF holdouts on 6 April. ENDF units threw up cordons around ASF camps throughout the region. In most of the camps, ASF units voluntarily surrendered and headed to designated assembly points.
ASF holdouts and the ENDF are now engaged on multiple fronts. There is a possibility Fano militia and other groups might join the ‘resistance camp,’ a development that would likely to worsen the situation.
The first clash occurred in the town of Gobeye. ASF who were summoned from Kobo, Waja and southern Tigray refused to give up their arms and started firing on the ENDF. In response, the ENDF started firing back; more than 6 people were killed. The ENDF did manage to disarm the ASF in Gobeye, and things are now more or less stable there.
Other fighting occurred near Debre Tabor. The ENDF tried to enter into an ASF camp near the town and disarm its fighters. But they refused to cooperate and there was a standoff; this temporarily closed the Bahir Dar-Gonder road. After negotiations, the ASF fighters finally agreed to surrender their arms. Some have reported more than 100 ASF have deserted and joined Fano.
Fighting has been at its most intense in the vicinity of Kobo. A division of the ASF has refused to give up arms near Gondar. At the same time, a faction of the ASF positioned in Lalibela and Sekota mutinied. The ENDF is moving into the area and senior regional leadership is trying to negotiate with them.
That a crisis was looming in the Amhara Region has been evident. That it would take a violent turn was predictable. The alliance between the Amhara and the Oromo (referred to as OROMARA) that underpinned Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed’s coalition had been under strain for over a year over a host of issues. It collapsed entirely following the peace deal signed by the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) and Ethiopia federal government in Pretoria in November 2022. Abiy made relations worse when he failed to endorse the Amhara state’s territorial claim to Western Tigray. In comments Abiymade to parliament earlier this year, he called for dialogue between the two sides, and hinted that parliament may ultimately be required to arbitrate the dispute.
The Prime Minister also ordered the arrest of 1000s of Fano militia and their leaders, further inflaming tensions in Amhara. Attempts to mend relations and talks in Addis Ababa, Bahir Dar and Adama failed to bring Amhara and Oromoelites to common ground. In retaliation, the Amhara Region cut off its supply of teff (a grain that makes the national dishinjera).
In recent weeks, the Ethiopian government has been drip-feeding the media about alleged plots to destabilise the country,including Fano militia seeking to infiltrate Addis to carry out assassinations of high-level officials. Check-points now dotthe perimeter of the city. There is heavy police and army presence on the main roads leading to the capital. Prominent Amhara journalists and academics have been arrested. The consistent message from Addis Ababa is now that the Amhara state constitutes a threat to the federal government. This seems to be aimed at preparing the public psychologically for some type of Tigray War-style ‘law enforcement operation’ in Amhara.
The disarmament of the Amhara is popular outside the region. The Oromo and Tigrayans, especially, are likely to relish this moment. Amhara forces have been Abiy’s most violent and zealous enforcers – blamed for many of the atrocities committed in Oromia and Tigray.
The Prime Minister’s push to demobilise ethnic forces and integrate them into the national army may be well-intentioned,but the speed, scale and timing at which it is taking place is certainly questionable. There is reason to believe this could stoke even more tension and instability. Worse, it could foment wider insecurity.
Abiy’s recentralisation agenda is not in doubt. Dismantling statutory and non-statutory ethnic state forces is designed to restore the central government’s monopoly on lethal military force. But there is a flaw in the logic: weakening the periphery does not automatically translate into a strong centre. More crucially, it is not necessarily a ticket to peace and stability. In the absence of local and national political settlements, territorial and resource contests and conflict can become militarised. There are always enough AK47 rifles, ammunition and RPGs to start the next insurrection. Some regional forces are much needed. In the Somali Regional State, the paramilitary special forces, the Liyu, have been instrumental in protecting the region from Al-Shabaab. At a time when Al-Shabaab is building cross-border structures, disarmament of the Liyu could prove disastrous for security.
For a country like Ethiopia, two-tier security, with a strong national army and police and robust and well-armed regionalforces, is preferable to the one Abiy envisions. Abiy seems to be going for the quick fix, again.
Well-planned and coordinated disarmament conducted as part of a broader national political settlement is fine. An incoherent, disjointed and rushed process of demobilisation and disarmament will only lead to more problems for Ethiopia.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.