The Baidoa Electoral Heist - The Turkish Connection
Ports Minister Abdulqadir Jama, colloquially known as ‘Jama Tik Tok,’ was declared the "winner" of parliamentary seat HOP#204 (Baidoa). However, the seat’s legitimate occupant, Isaq Ali ‘Subag - a prominent South West State leader and veteran cabinet member under former leader Abdiaziz Laftagareen - remains in office. Subag is neither deceased, incapacitated, nor has he resigned; no constitutional mechanism has been triggered to legally vacate his seat.
In a startling development, Subag appeared on a Somali podcast last evening to testify that his seat was seized through systemic duress and intimidation. He maintains his status as the bona fide MP of HOP#204, alleging that Speaker Adan Madoobe and emissaries from Villa Somalia attempted to bribe him to step down. When he refused the financial inducement, he was reportedly told, "We will secure this seat regardless of your consent."
While the internal mechanics of this transfer remain opaque, the event highlights not just the pervasive nature of corruption within the Somali parliament but also an increasing authoritarian tendency and disdain for norms. The elevation of Jama Tik Tok, therefore, is not merely unprocedural; it is a fundamental violation of democratic tenets and contradicts President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s (HSM) own much-vaunted commitment to direct election.
The "election" fails to meet any legal standard under either the existing or proposed frameworks: First, under the current legal framework, the parliament’s mandate expires on April 14, 2026. There is no constitutional provision or parliamentary bylaw that permits such radical changes to the composition of the legislature one week before the end of a mandate. This move is entirely without precedent.
Second, if evaluated against the newly amended draft, the process remains illegitimate. The 2026 framework mandates direct elections via the OPOV model. Instead, an electoral commission official simply declared Jama the winner for "filling a post" (boos buxinta kursiga). There was no contest, no campaign, and no visible democratic process.
Third, by established legal tradition and procedure, cabinet ministers seeking elective parliamentary posts must resign from their executive duties. Jama continues to serve as the Ports Minister, creating a conflict of interest and a breach of administrative protocol.
The "win" in Baidoa appears to be the opening salvo of a broader executive strategy to overturn parliamentary elections in South West State (SWS). This maneuver is likely part of a wider stratagem to consolidate power and facilitate HSM’s controversial one-year extension, potentially setting a dangerous blueprint for similar "overturns" across Somalia’s federal member states.
But there are other reasons why Jama’s mercurial rise to the top echelons of Somali politics matters: his installation represents a significant escalation in Turkiye’s influence over Somali legislative affairs. As a figure widely touted as Ankara’s primary interlocutor in Somalia, Jama’s unprocedural elevation and speculated grooming as next Speaker of Federal Parliament suggests a concerted effort by Villa Somalia to institutionalize Turkish interests within the federal parliament. By securing a parliamentary seat for a known proxy, Ankara transitions from external donor and military partner to an internal legislative stakeholder. This allows for the direct protection of Turkish commercial and maritime interests through legislative shielding.
Jama’s dual role as Ports Minister and MP is equally and particularly salient. Given Turkiye’s significant investments in Somali maritime infrastructure (notably the Port of Mogadishu), his "win" ensures that the executive and legislative oversight of these strategic assets remains under the control of a singular, Ankara-aligned official.
The brazen nature of this "heist" - conducted in open defiance of the 2012 Constitution - suggests a shift toward a model of governance where external patronage outweighs domestic constitutional legitimacy.
Jama stands as the longest-serving minister in Somalia, having navigated the administrations of both Farmajo and HSM. This longevity is widely attributed to his survival as a key Turkish asset. His tenure at the Ministry of Defence was characterized as disastrous; by 2024, allegations of sleaze and ineptitude were compounded by claims that he operated a "shadowy chain of command" that bypassed the Army Command and formal structures. When key international partners, including the United States, discreetly lobbied for his removal, Turkiye intervened to protect him. After serving as a caretaker for several months, he was transitioned to the Ministry of Ports—a docket central to Ankara’s maritime and naval strategy to secure access and control over Somalia's littoral assets.
The rapid military and political shifts in South West State (SWS) would likely have been impossible without direct Turkish backing. Earlier this year, the Turkish National Intelligence Organization (MIT) convened a strategic communications conference in Istanbul. Keynote speakers, including MIT chief Ibrahim Kalin, addressed how Turkish "altruism" in Somalia was being undermined by adversarial press. The guest list included Umut Cagri, a polarizing pro-Ankara blogger active on X (formerly Twitter). Following this summit, the Turkish state broadcaster TRT significantly amplified its campaign to "sell" a narrative of Turkish benevolence in Somalia.
On Friday, the Turkish deep-sea drilling vessel, the Cagri Bey, is scheduled to dock at the Port of Mogadishu to inaugurate offshore drilling operations—the exact kind of high-profile spectacle Jama is known to celebrate through his improvised songs on TikTok.
However, the unfolding events in SWS and the strategic placement of pro-Turkiye loyalists in key Somali institutions are not coincidental. They represent a calculated component of Ankara’s "long game" to achieve the comprehensive capture of the Somali state.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.