Why the Somali National Army Keeps Failing
Armies generally lose the will to fight for one of three reasons: they lose faith in their cause, they lose faith in their leaders, or their country loses faith in them. It may be argued that all three factors have contributed to the Somalia National Army's (SNA) recent surge of withdrawals, desertions and defections across the frontlines in Hiiraan, Lower and Middle Shabelle. Since late February, several waves of Al-Shabaab advances have revealed an SNA both incapable and unwilling to hold its ground. And with the ma'awiisley from the Hawaadle and other clan militias currently shouldering any concerted resistance against Al-Shabaab, with minimal support from Mogadishu, it is worth examining--again-- the reasons for the enduring ineffectiveness of the SNA. As so often is the case in Somalia, the heart of the problems lies with its absurd and self-defeating politicisation.
The SNA faces challenges across the board, ranging from failures to synchronise logistics to rotating forces effectively to a lack of kinetic mobility. Many of these problems were on full display after the federal government attempted to co-opt and monopolise the organic Hawaadle and Abgaal-led uprising against Al-Shabaab in mid-2022. Again and again, soldiers were thrown forward without any coherent military purpose into areas of minimal value in Hirshabelle and Galmudug before being stranded there. Over several months, in the early stages of Operation Black Lion, which envisioned clearing the jihadists from South West and Jubaland with the support of Addis and Nairobi, Al-Shabaab overran a number of major locations where SNA soldiers were isolated – most infamously at Osweyne in Galgauud in August 2023, when well over 100 soldiers were killed. To this day, no one has been held to account for these catastrophic mistakes and severe lapses in operational security.
Eventually, with 'Phase One' of operations going nowhere, plans for 'Operation Black Lion' also dissipated. Similarly, any discussion about the federated security architecture, agreed upon in President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's (HSM) first term in 2017 and revised in 2023, also evaporated. With no strategy beyond generating headlines about the 'all-out war' on Al-Shabaab, Villa Somalia has instead repurposed the SNA as a political tool in HSM's destabilising electoral and constitutional agenda.
It is little wonder that with such calamitous failures in recent years and with the military offensive having been all but abandoned, the SNA has degenerated into such a demoralised force. Despite approximately USD 1 billion in external military assistance being allocated to the country on an annual basis, the army faces chronic issues of inadequate equipment and unpaid stipends. The force is further infamous for indiscipline and absenteeism, with bases routinely undermanned and recruits inexplicably unaccounted for.
Equally concerning is the promotion system within the SNA, which remains highly politicised and unmoored from merit or battlefield experience. Officers with influential political connections and from more dominant clans routinely jump through the ranks or – like HSM's son, Abdifatah - are assigned to cushy VIP protection details, while leaving more effective soldiers unpromoted and serving under dangerously incompetent superiors. Consequently, amidst the latest Al-Shabaab offensive, many SNA officers supposed to be deployed to the frontlines were, in fact, still in Mogadishu. And among those serving in combat units, several senior commanders have recently become victims of 'fragging' – killed by their own demoralised troops.
There are some exceptions to this, particularly the US-trained Danab, which has a careful selection and extensive training process. But amidst the grim fall-out between Kismaayo and Mogadishu late last year, Jubaland's Danab special forces commander, Major Arab Dheeg, was dismissed after criticising his government for "prioritising political loyalty over professional competence." Failings of SNA command-and-control are also notorious, with many senior officers – including the underwhelming SNA Chief of Defence Forces, including General Odowaa Yusuf Rage – only capable of rudimentary tactical manoeuvre warfare rather than strategic leadership. There are also simply too few field-grade commanders in charge of operational planning and subordinate units.
Unable to trust their absent commanders and sometimes unpaid for months at a time, many within the rank-and-file routinely prefer to abandon their posts rather than risk their lives-- particularly in territories that do belong to their clan. With enduring issues of inadequate welfare and morale, recent desertions come not as a surprise but as further evidence of the army's institutional decay. Facing a cohesive, well-trained Al-Shabaab, the SNA has simply melted away in several places, including in Adan Yabaal in mid-April, where the army outnumbered the jihadists by well over 1,000 men. Even when replacements have been ordered from the capital, recruits have often refused to join the front, fearing they will be left unsupported or abandoned. And so significant has been the loss of combat troops that non-combat-trained Custodial Corps personnel have been dispatched to the battlefield to fill gaps in the line.
Somalia's security architecture is also notoriously corrupt, with immense funds and equipment siphoned off by senior ministers and officers. In addition to his moniker of 'Wasiir TikTok,' the long-serving Defence Minister Abdulkadir Mohamed Nur 'Jama' was also known as 'Mr 25%' for his apparent fondness for taking hefty cuts of contracts. Numerous other reports of corruption continue to plague the SNA, with the latest controversy involving the reported rental of military helicopters, which were intended for medical evacuation. Even parts of the Danab, the US-trained special forces and some of the only units capable of carrying out kinetic operations were implicated in a corruption scandal regarding food rations last year. Such pervasive graft helps to explain why, in many instances, Al-Shabaab are better armed than their government counterparts on the battlefield.
But more than any other factor, the politicisation of the SNA has fed into its current malaise. Since 2022, it has been increasingly apparent that Al-Shabaab was far from defeated, despite the president's and others' wild assertions, but simply biding its time. Amidst the lull in operations by the extremist group last year, it continued to consolidate its hold over its territory in central and southern Somalia, watching as Mogadishu sought to intimidate and suppress its domestic political opposition by force. And even though dozens of settlements have fallen to the jihadists in recent weeks, the government has shown next to no interest in re-examining its disastrous political and military approaches.
Instead, the federal government has continued to attempt to control and wield all elements of Somalia's security architecture for its own parochial agenda. From deploying its forces against the Jubaland administration in Ras Kamboni and Gedo to withholding much-needed equipment from South West State President Abdiaziz Laftagareen's forces, denying newer weapons and technicals to Hawiye sub-clans that it perceives as disloyal, and funnelling arms and ammunition to SSC-Khaatumo, Villa Somalia is apparently more eager to destabilise its own Federal Member States than to degrade and defeat Al-Shabaab. With the federal government so obviously uninterested in building a robust federation to confront threats to the nation, growing numbers of soldiers are - predictably - losing faith in both their leaders and their cause, preferring to desert their posts than fight to save the floundering HSM administration.
Conversely, the federal government seems to have lost faith in them. Villa Somalia's response to the desertions in March was scathing, with government-aligned cleric Sheikh Ali Wajis labelling soldiers as "infidels" and Custodial Corps commander Mahad Abdirahman Mohamed threatening retaliation against soldiers' families. Soldiers detailed to protect opposition leaders meeting in Mogadishu this week – a fairly standard practice in Somalia – have been threatened with dismissal and worse. And public confidence in the troops, though remarkably resilient, is gravely undermined by comically overstated government victory claims, slick and sophisticated (and generally more accurate) Al-Shabaab propaganda, and the undeniable evidence of attrition on the battlefield.
If Villa Somalia genuinely expects its troops to seize the advantage on the battlefield, it must first restore soldiers' faith in their leaders and their cause. It could start by showing, through the appointment of capable commanders, the articulation of a credible strategy, the curbing of corruption, and providing the care that its forces deserve, that their country still has genuine faith in them. What is far more likely, though, is that the federal government will continue pursuing its myopic, highly political, and micro-managing military strategy to the detriment of both the SNA and the country.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.