Returning Somali Refugees from Germany
In a trip to Germany early this month, Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud attended the Africa Trade Summit in Berlin, where he held bilateral talks with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz. During the meeting, the two leaders announced plans for the repatriation of undocumented Somali migrants in Germany – the agreement outlined the deportation of Somalis who had forfeited their asylum rights, with HSM declaring Somalia’s willingness to welcome them back. Chancellor Scholz emphasised that the initiative would prioritise the deportation of individuals involved in serious criminal offences while safeguarding the rights of law-abiding Somalis contributing positively to German society.
The agreement sparked significant backlash on Somali social media, with many accusing the government of neglecting its duty to ensure national security and pointing to persistent political divisions as major barriers to safe repatriation. Former Prime Minister Hassan Ali Khaire denounced the deal as "irresponsible," citing ongoing instability that continues to force Somalis to seek refuge abroad. Puntland Information Minister Eng Dirir added to the criticism, accusing HSM of endorsing the deportation of Somalis seeking asylum. In response to public outcry, the Somali government issued a clarification, reframing the agreement as voluntary and strictly limited to individuals without valid asylum claims. Yet, with Somalia already grappling to provide even basic social and economic security for its citizens, questions loom about its readiness to accommodate returning migrants.
In a 5 November interview with the German newspaper Bild, HSM encouraged Somalis who have lost their asylum rights in Germany to come home to reunite with their families and contribute to Somalia’s development, going as far as to say “our country has become safer; we're no longer just a civil war zone.” However, the timing of this appeal seems ironic given the harsh realities on the ground in Somalia. While the president encourages the return of migrants, Somalia continues to face ongoing security threats, a lack of jobs, and environmental crises. In Mogadishu, forced evictions and the demolition of homes have left many without options. The federal government’s limited capacity to support those already living in Somalia raises serious concerns about its ability to effectively accommodate returnees.
Challenges to the repatriation of Somalis also expose the lasting impact of Germany’s landmark 2015 decision to accept over one million refugees, with many fleeing conflicts in Syria and Iraq. While Germany’s humanitarian gesture was widely lauded at the time, it has since had profound political ramifications, including fuelling the far-right Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) party. The AfD has capitalised on public fear over integration, security and the economic burden of migration, significantly shifting Germany’s political discourse. What began as a fringe movement is now a prominent force in German politics, with anti-immigrant rhetoric central to its platform.
The broader shift in global migration patterns reflects a growing unwillingness among Western countries to accommodate asylum seekers. Policies like the European Commission’s July 2024 proposal to tighten visa regulations for Somalia— intended to encourage cooperation on the readmission of undocumented nationals— are part of this larger trend. Countries such as Finland have pursued similar measures with Somalia, signalling a global climate that increasingly discourages migration, particularly from countries facing instability.
In response to these changing dynamics, some members of the Somali diaspora, often educated and financially well-off, have opted to return to their homeland, hoping to invest in and contribute to Somalia’s rebuilding. However, this return has created a new class of elites, further exacerbating existing social and economic inequalities. Armed with global connections and financial resources, these returnees frequently dominate business opportunities and secure influential positions within government, side-lining Somalis who have remained behind, enduring years of conflict. This dynamic has deepened economic and political divides in the country, leaving those who remained behind struggling to compete in an increasingly unequal landscape.
Somali refugee returnees face entrenched challenges rooted in the country’s historical, political and socio-economic vulnerabilities. Weak social protection systems and clan-based networks often fail to provide inclusive support, leaving returnees stigmatised and perceived as ‘foreigners’ disconnected from their communities after years spent abroad. This alienation is compounded by the strain on traditional support systems already weakened by conflict and political instability. Somalia’s fragile governance and underdeveloped institutions offer limited access to jobs or financial resources, with many returnees finding their skills incompatible with an economy dominated by traditional trade. Psychological challenges also weigh heavily on returnees, particularly those who grew up abroad. For them, reintegration often involves grappling with loss of identity, unfamiliarity with local culture, and language barriers. These vulnerabilities create openings for exploitation by extremist groups like Al-Shabaab, which prey on feelings of alienation by offering financial support, as well as a sense of purpose and belonging.
Instead of prioritising international agreements driven by political objectives— such as the initiative to repatriate undocumented migrants from Germany— greater focus should be placed on addressing the systemic challenges that hinder Somalia’s ability to support its people. Strengthening social protection systems, generating economic opportunities and fostering inclusive community programs are critical steps. Such measures would not only provide more effective support for returnees but also lay the groundwork for Somalia’s long-term stability and sustainable development.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.