UNdone: The End of UNSOM
In May, a letter from Somalia's Foreign Minister Ahmed Moallim Fiqi to the UN Security Council (UNSC) surfaced, proposing the termination of the UN Assistance Mission in Somalia (UNSOM) when its mandate ended in October 2024. It came shortly after Catriona Laing's departure as the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General (SRSG) to Somalia and caught most by surprise. A chaotic back-and-forth followed, eventually resulting in an agreed two-year transition from a UN political office to a country one. Experienced US diplomat and former SRSG to Somalia Jim Swan has been brought back to oversee the transition.
From November onwards, after 11 years, UNSOM will be rebranded as the UN Assistance Transition Mission in Somalia (UNATMIS), a clear nod to the African Union peacekeeping mission also set to transition at the end of 2024. Why the federal government would want to reference the peacekeeping mission is unclear, but the end of UNSOM has been touted as the next step in Somalia's state-building trajectory. Federal officials have repeatedly asserted that now is the time to step in and assume a host of responsibilities from the UN-- and take greater control of the money that comes with it. Fiqi's initial letter that proposed UNSOM's conclusion also aligns with the broader 'Mogadishu Rising' narrative that Somalia has turned a definitive corner. Anything to the contrary is doom and gloom from naysayers looking to undermine the country.
The outlines of the transition by a joint UN-federal committee have been published and, while still negotiable, are revealing about the federal government's priorities. For the next two years, a quasi-political office will remain, but the central tenets of the proposed transition appear to be 1) to reduce scrutiny of the federal government and 2) to sustain the flow of financial support from the international community. A key question is whether the UN mission will retain its convening political power, with it currently allowed to involve itself in political reconciliation, even when the federal government opposes it. If this facilitatory capacity is removed, it will seriously neuter the UN mission's capacity as an independent body. Moreover, according to the document, the SRSG will hold just a single closed UNSC briefing session per year, drastically diminishing one of the central public-facing analyses of Somalia's political, security, and humanitarian situation. These briefings have rankled successive federal administrations, with Laing's perceived outspokenness at the UNSC one of the principal reasons Villa Somalia successfully lobbied against her term renewal. On the funding side, the UN will also support Somalia's federal government in accessing donor funding that aligns with its 'development priorities.'
According to the proposal document, the UN will continue supporting the constitutional review and electoral processes. Electorally, this will take the form of largely financial and technical assistance. Yet the constitutional review process, after years of painstaking technical support, has been co-opted at the 11th hour by Villa Somalia and used to push its radically centralising agenda. The controversial passage of the heavily revised Chapters 1-4 of the Provisional Constitution in parliament triggered Puntland's withdrawal of recognition of the federal government earlier this year. And the likelihood of Somalia's federal government conducting 'one-person, one-vote' elections of any convincing quality in the next year remains essentially zero. While the UN will likely be asked to continue footing the bill for these dubious exercises, their capacity to critique the proceedings will be diminished.
Other areas also highlighted for the federal government to assume control over include stabilisation, climate adaptation and resilience, and women's representation and participation, though it acknowledges it will require support from other UN agencies. Here, one can expect UN scrutiny to be diminished as well. Regarding women's representation and participation, the federal administration has shown little interest in advancing either—removing all reference to the 30% quota in politics from the Provisional Constitution and appointing a general to the renamed Ministry of Women and Human Rights Development-- now the Ministry of Family.
More broadly, the politicisation of development funds through the federal government should also raise alarms about this transition. Villa Somalia has blatantly weaponised development money intended for Puntland to pressure the regional administration amid their political dispute over the country's direction. Though the UN and the Puntland administration have agreed to work together, directing funds into the coffers of Villa Somalia could further embolden the government to continue its centralising agenda with carte blanche. The question now is whether this pattern could extend to Jubaland, with regional President Ahmed 'Madoobe' publicly withdrawing from last week's National Consultative Council meeting.
Fundamentally, the federal government still lacks the capacity to absorb and implement the UN's responsibilities. While there can be a certain degree of paternalism when discussing Somalia, the state's functions and architecture remain extremely limited in many departments. At the heart of this is the contradiction of the international community having recognised the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) in 2012 prematurely, without the real foundations of a political settlement in place. Consequently, UNSOM, and others in the international community, have suffered from their clunky mandate, having to support successive administrations in 'state-building' while its occupants seek to politicise or undermine the limited progress made. Still, much remains to be seen whether the UN can effectively respond to its mandate and personnel being reduced. Keeping the right personnel and capabilities will be critical, though this is infamously difficult in the restrictive UN system. But the UNSOM transition comes at a moment of a confluence of rising political and security crises for Somalia, with more scrutiny, not less, truly needed.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.