Stigma and HIV in Somalia
Last week, the Banaadir regional administration announced it had arrested 35 workers in Mogadishu for carrying infectious diseases in the capital, including Hepatitis and HIV/AIDS. Of that number, four HIV-positive foreign nationals working menial jobs were subsequently deported to 'prevent the spread of the disease.' The apparent criminality of carrying these diseases, with some unaware of their condition, was not explained by the administration. Somalia is far from the only country that has archaically and without logic deported individuals living with HIV, with Algeria, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia, among several others, known to do so as well.
What is notable is the sustained lower rates of HIV/AIDS in Somalia when compared to its neighbours, particularly Kenya. Somalia has long enjoyed one of the lowest HIV infection rates in Africa, even as the continent accounts for 65% of the global HIV-positive population and 62% of all new HIV cases worldwide. However, with the government's collapse in the 1990s and subsequent decades of conflict, gathering accurate medical statistics and the ability to diagnose diseases in Somalia has proven extremely difficult. One 2023 UNAIDS report estimated that only 8,200 people in Somalia were living with HIV, a proportion far below the global average of 1.2% and Sub-Saharan Africa's 9% average. The accuracy of this number is questionable when examining other data sets, including a UNAIDS testing of prisoners, that suggests the actual proportion may be closer to 0.4% or higher. Even 0.4% is extraordinarily low, however, considering that 70% of Somalia's population lives below the poverty line, less than 30% have access to healthcare, and communities lack knowledge about practising safe sex. These factors, and particularly the conflict-HIV nexus, would lead one to expect far higher rates.
The comparatively low rates of HIV in Somalia, even acknowledging that most medical statistics in Somalia should be taken with a pinch of salt, can be partially attributed to the isolated nature of the country in the past 30 years. Patterns of transmission of HIV in Africa have routinely fallen along major trucking roads due to the prevalence of prostitution. There has been massive and sustained internal displacement in Somalia over the years from climate disasters and armed conflict, but these patterns, as well as the nomadic nature of pastoralist communities, have not resulted in widespread HIV infections. Yet other sexually transmitted diseases, such as chlamydia and syphilis, remain more prevalent in large parts of the country.
The stigmatisation of HIV and extramarital sex has resulted in the underreporting and active discrimination of those living with the disease. Within this context, religious and cultural norms have typically portrayed HIV-positive individuals as symbols of moral failure, with the virus being unfairly associated with sexual immorality or relations with foreigners. Moreover, the prevalence of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) in Somali society, around 98% of women are believed to have undergone infibulation– the most extreme type, further makes women and girls more vulnerable to infection.
Open-minded approaches to HIV are often equated with moral corruption, making the open reporting of infections or seeking healthcare for HIV-related issues far more complicated. TV and radio channels have been known to refuse to air HIV awareness campaigns, while those living with the disease are often evicted from their homes by landlords. These cultural perceptions of HIV in Somalia are likely to have contributed to the recent arrests and deportations of infected individuals, as well as the broader challenges in effectively managing the virus within the country, even with the comparatively low levels. For many Somalis, HIV is viewed as a disease that has been ‘imported’ from outside the country, and that is not endemic to a Muslim society.
With violence and conflict still so widespread across the country, women remain vulnerable to rape and sexual violence from a host of armed actors, further raising their risk of HIV infection. Equitable access to post-exposure prophylaxis and other HIV drugs remains a major issue, with the country's healthcare system highly fragmented. While several clinics in Banaadir provide HIV support, those outside of Mogadishu are forced to deal with a far more patchwork health system that may not include HIV therapy. There are still fewer functional hospitals, fewer medical personnel and equipment, as well as drugs and financial resources to help support those living with HIV to suppress the disease.
These cultural and structural barriers severely undermine early HIV diagnosis, reporting, and treatment in Somalia, creating significant challenges in effectively managing the preventable virus. While the country has comparatively low rates of HIV, those living with it experience enormous discrimination from the conservative elements of Somali society. Awareness-raising of the importance of safe sex and the realities of living with HIV in 2024, as well as early testing, timely reporting, monitoring and management, are critical to preventing new cases and supporting those living with HIV. Overall, implementing a 'do-no-harm' approach for the Somali context will be far more effective at tackling HIV in the long term than the current sporadic system in place today.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.