Somalia's Humanitarian Crisis: Need and Greed
Decades of armed conflict, climate catastrophes, and famine have left nearly four million people displaced in Somalia. They overwhelmingly reside in almost 2,400 internally displaced person (IDP) camps dotted across the country. While these IDP camps, 85% of which are informal settlements on private land in urban areas, are supported by international donors, the current need far outstrips provision and capacity. Meanwhile, Somalia's various administrations are often reluctant to integrate IDPs into urban areas for a variety of reasons.
Cyclical and entrenched displacement in Somalia has formed particular ecosystems of corruption in these camps that impact aid distribution and day-to-day living. With the creation of informal settlements on peri-urban land owned by other clans, there is space rife for exploitation and siphoning off of money and aid. In late 2023, a UN investigation uncovered widespread theft of assistance by a number of actors along the humanitarian 'food chain.' In particular, IDP camp managers were singled out for charging rent on the land, insisting that IDPs surrender a portion of their food aid to camp officials in lieu of monetary payment. Two displaced persons described how they were lured to a camp with promises of a better life, only to have their financial aid siphoned off by the camp manager. One IDP said, "We were promised USD 130 but received only half." Ironically, the move to cash aid in Somalia was prompted by an earlier corruption scandal, but with camp visits by international humanitarian personnel restricted by insecurity, monitoring of humanitarian distribution remains far from robust.
In recent years, direct cash assistance has been increasingly touted as a solution to some of these issues, with the understanding that displaced and vulnerable communities know their needs better than external actors. In Somalia, though, this has also been implicated in corruption scandals where local officials tasked with identifying beneficiaries manipulate the system for personal gain, at times adding their families and friends to the recipient list. These officials, known as 'chairs' of constituents, are responsible for identifying vulnerable individuals, including orphans and people with disabilities, within their constituencies to receive financial assistance. While cash vouchers are supposed to be distributed to be exchanged for food, a portion of these funds are frequently withheld by the distributing partner. In some cases, these officials have coerced people into registering unrelated children as their own to secure additional aid.
Despite reform after reform and years of institutional knowledge, delivering aid, in whatever form, remains an immensely complex procedure in Somalia. However robust the mechanism established to prevent aid diversion, it is nigh impossible to stop the seeping of aid through one avenue or another. Even the Danab, the best-trained special forces in the Somali National Army, are not insulated from the country's political economy. And it is not just Somalia that has been embroiled in corruption scandals in the Horn lately, with senior federal Ethiopian officials too implicated in the massive diversion of humanitarian aid in 2023. Still, practical steps can always be taken to prevent aid diversion, including introducing extra oversight into the aid distribution process and better vetting of organisations tasked with aid distribution.
How years of displacement and aid have contributed to the formation of a highly-exploited urban underclass made up of disenfranchised youth more susceptible to violent extremism and crime has been much overlooked. While the Somali Bantu have long faced discrimination on ethnic grounds, their displacement from rural to urban has refracted these dynamics in new and disturbing ways as these disparate groups have gradually moved from agrarian communities to densely populated slums, working manual jobs that are perceived as low-worth by ethnic Somalis. The Somali Bantu, comprised of several distinct groups in southern Somalia, increasingly view themselves as a united and politically active force.
Last August, when the Bantu military officer Sheegow Ahmed Ali was arrested in Mogadishu for operating an armed group, protests erupted in both Baidoa and the capital. It signalled that the most marginalised group in Somalia was both increasingly armed and operating under a cohesive identity. And, subsequently, after decades of violent exploitation, it is becoming readily apparent that continuing to ignore these communities in IDP camps across central and southern Somalia is no longer sustainable. Engaging with the Bantu and others as equals, not using them as humanitarian bait or manual labour, cannot wait. Tackling the perennial corruption and malpractice in IDP camps across Somalia would be one place to start.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.