Al-Shabaab's Shadow 'War on Football'
Yesterday evening, Al-Shabaab detonated a car bomb parked next to a popular cafe in Mogadishu, killing 5 people and wounding over 20 more. At the time of the blast, football fans had gathered at the Top Coffee Restaurant in the capital's centre to watch England play Spain in the Euro 2024 Finals on a large flat-screen TV. It is probable that most attendees would have paid a small sum to watch the match that ended in a 2-1 victory to Spain.
While another grim reminder of the continued potency of the extremist group, the deadly attack also underscored Al-Shabaab's long-running campaign to rid Somalia of football. In its propaganda distributed by its Al-Kataib Media Foundation, Al-Shabaab has depicted the world's most popular game as a social scourge as well as a form of Western enslavement and debauchery to mislead Muslim youth. Jihadist clerics will invoke the theological principle of 'lawh' -- any frivolous pursuit that makes people forget Allah-- to ban football, a restrictive interpretation favoured by nearly all Salafists. But what makes Al-Shabaab different is its repeated wielding of violence to stop the watching of football.
Last night's attack was not the first by the extremist group on football spectators, having previously conducted bombings on stadiums themselves. In April 2018, Al-Shabaab detonated a remote-controlled landmine at a football stadium in Baraawe in Lower Shabelle, killing 5 people and injuring 10 more. Meanwhile, across Al-Shabaab-controlled territory, the content of already-limited satellite TV is severely restricted. Restaurants and public outlets can show Al-Jazeera Arabic and Al-Jazeera English.
Traditional Sunni Islamic scholarship and consensus deem the notion of football as 'lahw' as misguided. In fact, most call spectator football 'mustahab' – an intrinsically harmless social pursuit that may be socially and psychologically beneficial. Football has become increasingly popular across the Muslim world. It has been particularly encouraged by the Gulf capitals that have poured USD billions into their country’s football development and famous teams such as Manchester City, despite accusations of 'sports-washing' their human rights records.
Al-Shabaab's shadow war on football is part of its broader counter-cultural campaign to resist what it deems as a decadent foreign influence. In the past, the extremist group has banned pop music channels, Bollywood dramas and Mexican soaps – three influential foreign TV exports to Somalia. While Egyptian channels showing historical dramas are tolerated, those showing romantic films are not.
Still, Al-Shabaab is unable to police TV content wholly without control of satellite reception and distribution. Public viewing of satellite television remains prevalent across much of Somalia, with most families unable to afford a TV set and satellite subscription for their homes. While cafes draw customers to buy their goods by airing satellite TV, other Somalis have established ingenious methods to circumvent hefty subscriptions. They clone signals and distribute them 'illegally' over a vast local network – thus cutting the cost per family and spreading digital and satellite TV content to the poor. Radio still remains the most popular form of media in Somalia by some distance, however, and many would have listened to the game huddled around a portable radio last night.
The Federal Government of Somalia is engaged in its own modest counter-cultural campaign. In recent years, a number of youth centres have been established in Mogadishu to provide youth with 'healthy' recreation. Boy’s only youth clubs have been set up to teach dominoes, chess, card games, and pool. Senior government officials, including President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, PM Hamza Barre, and former intelligence chief Mahad Salad, have all toured some of these new centres and met with youths. For young boys caught up in violent extremism, football and other sports can offer a critical expressive outlet and a potent form of de-radicalisation as they transition back into normal life. Playing professional football has also provided financial rewards for young men who might otherwise face a life of impoverishment or extremism.
Al-Shabaab's extremism and its attachment to a benighted form of theology make for a grim prospect for youth under their watch. In a country where 70% of people are under 30 and who grew up in an age where England's Premier League has become an almost universal language, the prospect of a life without 'the beautiful game' is pretty depressing. Last night's attack on those simply watching a football match taking place in Berlin, thousands of miles away, further speaks to the worst instincts of the jihadists.
While some wrongly believe that negotiations with Al-Shabaab would foster a new era of peace in Somalia, the cultural imposition of a potential takeover has barely been addressed. Sports, art, film, theatre, dance, and music are all certain to face severe restrictions from Al-Shabaab, and with it, the tapestry of Somali life becomes a little greyer. While Mogadishu today is nothing like it was in the 1950s, liberally filled with music and bars on the capital's Lido Beach, it would nevertheless face a further reduction in self-expression and enjoyment if Al-Shabaab has its way. In this light, it is little wonder that many Somali youth are considering fleeing if the extremists can seize power.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.