Does anyone actually want OPOV elections?
In May, federal and regional leaders, barring Puntland President Said Deni, assembled in Mogadishu for a meeting of the National Consultative Council (NCC). What emerged from the NCC was a tentative agreement to harmonise federal and regional polls in 2026 under a one-person, one-vote (OPOV) system to be overseen by a federal committee. Yet, less than three months later, the Jubaland and South West State presidents are already breaking from the pact to hold dubious traditional 'elections' in a bid to stay in power. And, for the moment, the federal government is keeping quiet.
The 'gaming' of Federal Member State (FMS) polls in Somalia is nothing new– these votes have little to do with genuine political alternation or freedom of choice but rather are carefully choreographed events intended to legitimise elite pacts. The timing is conspicuous-- neither South West State President Abdiaziz Laftagareen nor his Jubaland counterpart Ahmed Islam 'Madoobe' want federally-controlled OPOV elections that could unseat them in two years' time. Consequently, after weeks of speculation, they have both moved toward holding traditional elections that are 'legitimate' enough to be accepted by fellow elites and constituents while endorsing de facto term extensions.
Laftagareen is now expected to form a temporary electoral committee by 15 July at the latest, while a vote will take place by September 2024. And last week, as widely predicted, Madoobe directed his regional parliament to amend Jubaland's constitution to allow Somalia's longest-serving leader to run again and extend the presidential term from four to five years. It is not yet clear when the FMS president will hold elections, but Madoobe's term too has already expired, having last held elections in August 2019.
So far, the federal government has not commented on the apparent disregard for May's NCC agreement. While Villa Somalia has agitated for OPOV polls, it nevertheless has a similar rationale to Madoobe and Laftagareen– wanting to hold elections when it knows its favoured candidates can win. At this juncture, it appears that Villa Somalia is currently weighing up if Laftagareen is that candidate and whether it can still co-opt the South West president to support its constitutional agenda. A newer factor likely playing into their calculations is the growing plot by federal South West lawmakers to impeach Prime Minister Hamza Abdi Barre, with the blessing of Laftagareen, since the reopening of parliament last weekend.
If Villa Somalia decides not to continue dealing with the Laftagareen, it could well seek to delay the elections until such a time, place, and modality that its favoured candidate will win. Or, as some have suggested, the federal government may decide to hold parallel polls in Baraawe and refuse to recognise Laftagareen's all-but-certain victory. The government's favoured candidate to replace Laftagareen is believed to be Defence Minister Abdulkadir Mohamed Nur 'Jama.'. But with Laftagareen maintaining a firm hold on Baidoa and, crucially, the city's airport, Villa Somalia will not want to sever relations with another Federal Member State leader unless it is sure that it can win.
So, in essence, we are currently playing a waiting game while federal and regional leaders seek to manipulate the elections at the FMS level in their favour in a way that still appears legitimate enough to prevent violence from erupting. And in a country that has faced decades of incessant violence, what do 'free and fair' polls actually entail? In a mature and robust democracy, free and fair elections would be fairly respectable, with most of the electorate able to participate and accept the majority of outcomes. But in Somalia, where most are understandably concerned about violence breaking out, it is an integral part of the body politic for the elite to make dubious pacts and to stoke violence if those choices aren't respected. Politicians such as former President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo are the masters of inciting violence to 'game' polls to force term extensions and undermine his opponents.
In Somali politics, there is a thin line between legitimacy and chaos, particularly when it comes to elections. All Somalis understand that the current federal and regional elections are essentially bought and sold with patronage and promises, but they nevertheless will routinely imbue the victor with a critical mandate-- if the vote is 'legitimate' enough. This is why, even though they surely would love to, Laftagareen and Madoobe cannot simply wave their hands and grant themselves another term in office. Crossing the amorphous, changeable line risks turning febrile politics into violence. And some politicians are better at reading the mood than others, able to pull back from the edge at critical moments.
While all these leaders will inevitably pay lip service to the possibility of free and fair polls in Somalia, we should ask ourselves, do any of these elite actually want OPOV? And how good is 'good enough' to prevent violence between, say, the Leysan and Laftagareen erupting? Only time will tell, but the brief truce established at the NCC appears to be dying a death of a thousand cuts.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.