Historical Grievances Fuel Somalia's Clan Wars
The Sa'ad against the Leelkaase, the Ayr vs. the Duduble, and the Mareehaan clashing with the Dir. On an almost weekly basis in recent months, clan conflicts have flared in central and southern Somalia, often leaving dozens of fighters and civilians slain. Reasons for these escalations are distinct to inter-communal dynamics but share numerous similarities and are often rooted around deeper historical grievances as well as questions of local, regional, and national representation. Al-Shabaab, too, has a frequent hand in the violence, seeking to stoke inter-clan rivalries for its own advantage.
On 6 July, at the reopening of the federal parliament, Somalia's President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud accused the extremist group of driving the current spate of inter-clan violence in a bid to undermine the government's military operations. While it is true that the extremist group is believed to be furtively involved in a number of ongoing clan disputes, it is inaccurate to wholly attribute the internecine violence to Al-Shabaab. Many of these conflicts are tied to dormant grievances that are being increasingly accessed over ever-sparser grazing land or water access points. With climate change placing greater pressure on pastoralists and farmers across Somalia, once relatively bountiful areas are becoming points of increasing contestation between neighbouring clans.
For Al-Shabaab, fueling inter-clan violence is less about undermining the government's 'expanding' authority, as federal officials have asserted, and more about opportunity. There are several ways in which the jihadists covertly incite clan violence, but they frequently deploy fighters to their own communities to assassinate a neighbouring clan elder or leader to spark retaliatory violence. Rather than being viewed as an Al-Shabaab fighter, the killer is considered through the lens of their clan, and the bloodshed can quickly take on a life of its own. For Al-Shabaab, igniting these conflicts offers a chance to resolve them through their own clan representatives and influence inter-clan politics, as well as alleviating military pressure from militias that could be otherwise positioned against them. Further, when they advance, the jihadists can present opportunities for revenge and bloodletting to new recruits from these clans.
Casualty numbers can be eye-watering. For instance, in just 10 days in early June, at least 60 people were killed and dozens more injured in Galgaduud after fighting erupted between Mareehaan and Dir communities. While Galmudug's Information Minister Abshir Shikow cited Al-Shabaab as driving the violence, this time around, there was no clear evidence that the extremist group was fuelling the violence. Instead, the conflict seemingly arose from increasing competition for water and grazing land between the Mareehaan, who have traditionally occupied the area, and the Dir community, who are establishing a greater presence. In particular, tensions have been rising surrounding the building of residential buildings by Dir in the area, which should eventually grant them a share of the political representation of the district. While some clans can quickly access effective de-escalatory mechanisms, this is not the case between the Dir and the Mareehaan, whose clashes have been infamously bloody.
One particularly important element of inter-clan violence that is often overlooked is the manner in which historical grievances are remembered and acted upon. Somalia is a profoundly oral society with a rich history of storytelling, poetry, and fables, which are passed down through the patrilineal clan structures. On the flip side, particular affronts or notable killings as far back as a century ago are not forgotten, but with no written records, realities often become warped across time. Subsequently, the layered patchwork of complex grievances in Somalia is held close by clans, with stories of repression or heroism accessed again and again by families, often lying dormant until communities compete for political or economic resources. Of course, this dynamic is not unique to Somalia, but its particular oral society and clan structures can help drive a potent mix of retaliatory, cyclical violence. And with thirty years of continued instability and forcible displacement, disputes surrounding land are particularly acute.
Take, for instance, the infamous 'Tomaselli' line in Mudug that an Italian colonial administration established to separate the Darood/ Majerteen/Omar Mahmood to the north and the Hawiye/Habar Gidir/Sa'ad to the south. Yet today, no one can agree on where precisely the line was drawn, with some contending that it runs 60 km or 80 km to the south of Gaalka'yo, while others posit that it runs directly through the town. And with these disputes, the Tomaselli line has ironically become yet another area of violent contestation.
The current scale of the ongoing clashes is particularly revealing just how impotent the regional and federal governments are in reconciling communities and separating clashing militias. Economic or political disputes can quickly escalate into violent contestation in a country awash with arms and where the government does not possess a monopoly of force. Further, the violence we are seeing today is another legacy of the imposition of a top-down system of governance in a country where the hard graft of reconciliation and resource allocation between clans had not been tackled.
In Galmudug, a number of the ongoing conflicts have further been ascribed to politicians, including President Ahmed Karie 'QoorQoor,' ahead of the buildup to regional presidential elections. Regional and federal politicians have shown a repeated propensity to deploy their clan members to undermine opponents and foment crises. But with every new conflict that erupts, militias and communities that could otherwise be involved in the stalled offensive against Al-Shabaab turn inwards.
In part, the country is experiencing the failure to capitalise on the successes of the Hawaadle uprising in Hiiraan in August 2022 and continued disinterest in comprehensively engaging with the clan elite. As soon as violence ebbs and elders can hash together a tentative peace, regional and federal government's attention turns elsewhere. Amid growing speculation that Al-Shabaab could seize power in Mogadishu, either through negotiated capitulation or capture, the deadly clan clashes we are currently witnessing from the Luuq district in Gedo to Mudug may only be the beginning.
The Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
I stand before you today with profound respect and appreciation for the sacrifices the sons and daughters of your countries have made in the AMISOM/ATMIS/AUSSOM missions to help their African brothers and sisters in Somalia fight the scourge of Al-Shabaab, open and maintain critical trade routes, and help in the state-building process of Somalia.
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.