Somalia's gender-based violence crisis
Last week, three women were killed in Somalia, all reportedly murdered by their husbands. One mother-of-6 was murdered in Mogadishu, while two more women were killed in Lower Shabelle. And on Sunday, 4 February, another man was arrested in Afgooye town carrying gasoline and a matchbox following reports that he was intending to set his family alight. The condemnation of this spate of killings has been widespread, with protests erupting in several places across Somalia. Somalia's MPs have further demanded rapid justice and the arrests of those responsible.
But while the horrors of the past few days have stirred a strong reaction, there remains a tendency to downplay or overlook the prevalence of sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in Somalia. It remains a taboo subject -- with the vast majority of SGBV going unreported in Somalia's patriarchal society. Support for women remains extremely limited, particularly regarding legal recourse and healthcare.
Precise data on the scale of SGBV in Somalia is hard to ascertain. But in 2021, the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) reported an alarming 80% year-on-year rise in GBV cases in the country. Women and children were the overwhelming victims, making up 93% of those who reported such incidents, with more than 90% of the perpetrators male. Already prevalent violence surged during the COVID-19 pandemic amid a global economic downturn and a punishing drought in Somalia. However, rather than subside, cases have remained shockingly high and actually increased into 2023.
The majority of victims are women and girls sheltering in internally displaced persons (IDP) camps. Data gathered in 2021 in several IDP camps indicated that 52% had experienced some form of SGBV, particularly physical assault, rape, and other forms of sexual violence. They face specific vulnerabilities in these poorly policed sites, including being forced to travel to access humanitarian aid, firewood, or water. Many are also from marginalised sub-clans without equal access to resources or influence.
SGBV thrives in the kind of social, economic, and political insecurity that has long been prevalent in Somalia. At the end of January 2024, the Somali Disaster Management Agency Commissioner Mohamud Moallim said that of the nearly four million people displaced in Somalia, over 80% are women and children. Yet, too often, women's rights and protection are treated as an afterthought rather than a priority. At times of crisis, initiatives are understandably focused on providing immediate humanitarian aid, such as food and shelter. But inadvertently, establishing these massive IDP camps that may be effective at distributing large quantities of assistance can create unsafe spaces for women and children.
The outcry by Somalia's MPs and other officials is hard to take seriously, considering that the federal parliament has yet to pass the United Nations-backed Sexual Offences Bill from 2018. The bill criminalised rape but was shelved after coming up against stiff opposition. Despite the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) being recognised nearly 12 years ago, there are still no federal laws that explicitly criminalise spousal abuse or assault. And when it comes to traditional justice mechanisms, women can only access it through their male relative, be it a husband, brother, or father. With women not considered 'responsible' in Somalia's patriarchal society, those who do seek legal or traditional recourse independently are stigmatised.
In the rare instances that cases do come to court, prosecutors use the outdated penal code from the 1970s to charge suspects. The code is not strict enough for crimes of sexual violence or domestic abuse, however, and is not fit for purpose in the 21st century. A whole host of sexual offences are not covered in these codes, including marital rape.
While some regions, including Puntland, have passed legislation prohibiting rape, federal initiatives have partly failed because of ingrained social resistance and religious objections. The Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Sadia Yasin Samatar, the highest-ranking elected female politician in Somalia, publicly supported legislation criminalising rape and other sexual offences. But following intense backlash and threats, she was forced to walk back her comments, instead welcoming religious scholars who "have the country's interest at heart" to amend the law. Numerous Somali legislators remain opposed to codifying secular punishments for sexual violence in the belief that it contradicts Sharia law. But with this refusal, victims and survivors have ended up with the worst of both worlds, where the law is unclear and applied unevenly.
Legislative action can only be part of the urgent reform, however. Domestic violence is widespread and tolerated, and women cannot access support to escape from abusive relationships. If the essential legal and social support was in place to protect women, then the tragedies of the last week might have been avoided. Any outrage should be capitalised on and draw further attention to the structural discrimination facing Somali women. If MPs want to see real change, they can begin by reviving the 2018 Sexual Offences Bill and pass comprehensive legislation to start to tackle these entrenched crimes.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Ethiopia’s leaders are fighting a new war with an old conviction: that military victory can permanently settle the question of who owns the state. But the coalition that encircled Tigray in 2020 has fractured, the regional balance has shifted, and drone capabilities are spreading to the government’s opponents. The battlefield looks familiar, but the strategic conditions are profoundly different. The danger lies in mistaking the temporary capture of territory for the resolution of deep-seated conflict, a ruinous road Ethiopia has travelled before; its towns bear the scars, and its people carry the losses.
In social psychology, the term "desperation conundrum" refers to a psychological paradox wherein an acute, extreme, or severe need for an objective inadvertently impedes its attainment. This occurs because an intense sense of urgency frequently drives choices and behaviours that alienate the very outcome that is so desperately sought.
Somalia’s contemporary political trajectory is profoundly defined by the month of October. Within the Somali collective consciousness, October is not merely another page on the calendar; it is the recurring crucible of political upheaval, tragedy and systemic transformation.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has since 10 October been deploying National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) forces, specifically the little-known Public Protection Forces (Ilaalada Shacabka / People’s Protection Forces), in Wadajir. This mobilisation is concentrated close to the home of ex-President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed – a development widely criticised by many Somalis as provocative. Some interpret the build-up as a prelude, possibly, to some form of armed action against the former president and leader of the opposition Somali Future Council, amid uncorroborated media reports that President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has used Abgaal clan elders to relay an ultimatum demanding the disarmament of Sharif and other opposition figures.
It’s been a bruising week for the Somali Federal Government (FGS), headed by President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), whose constitutional term of office expired in May this year. Yesterday, forces aligned with the administration of Jubaland peacefully took control of the strategic border town of Beled Haawo in Somalia’s Gedo region – a lucrative customs post for trade and transit with Kenya. Roughly 1,000 Daraawiish paramilitaries loyal to Abdirashid Hassan Janan – a fickle politician who is notorious for changing sides in a volatile region – reportedly deployed across key sites in the town following negotiations with the previous local administration.
Plans are intensifying within Hiiraan to establish an autonomous "Hiiraan State." This development reflects deep-seated regional and clan cleavages reasserting themselves in local politics, set against the backdrop of a stalled federal process, a breakdown in talks between President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) and the opposition Somalia Future Council (SFC), and an unravelling Somali federation.
Nearly a month has passed since a powerful blast destroyed the home of General Mahad, widely known as Taliye Shub, in Doolow, a political dissident who opposed the government of Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.
While Mogadishu’s elite were ensconced in the Hangar complex last week praising Turkey, berating its critics, and proclaiming a ‘New Somalia’, the country's periphery told a vastly different story - one where "old Somalia," with its deep-seated clan feuds and the brutal calculus of blood and retaliation, remained stubbornly intact.
On 5 September, Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro arrived in the United States for an informal working visit designed to launch a new diplomatic push to cement Hargeisa's rising geopolitical profile. Monitored closely both regionally and internationally, the high-stakes trip carries immense domestic expectations. It represents an ambitious diplomatic outreach by Hargeisa to Washington, capitalising on the momentum generated by Israel's formal recognition of Somaliland in December 2025. However, translating this sudden diplomatic visibility into tangible strategic prospects remains a formidable challenge.