Somalia's toxic political discourse
The polarised and toxic political discourse that took place during the tenure of former Somali President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo appears to be creeping back. Since the New Year’s Memorandum (MoU) between Ethiopia and Somaliland, online debate has been flooded with extreme positions, and rhetoric directed at those viewed as insufficiently patriotic or supportive of Somalia’s ‘unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity.’ Constructive criticism and nuance are increasingly perceived as threats to national well-being and the country's supposedly rosy trajectory.
The online polarisation of recent years began to seep into political discourse with the arrival of Farmaajo in Villa Somalia in 2017. His campaign for president had relied heavily on whipping up nationalist fervour amongst youth, to counteract his relatively weak position as leader of the Tayo Political Party. Once in power, Farmaajo retained his social media team and turned to ‘bot farms’ to burnish his administration's image and target his critics. Those supportive of the ruling Nabad and Nolol coalition, the 'CBB's,' an ultra-nationalist online group of commentators, would routinely unleash waves of abuse on those who questioned Farmaajo’s authoritarian tendencies. A term was coined to denote the scale of administration cooptation of the media for its own agenda, 'igu sawir' ('photo opportunity’).
The whipping up of the online mobs was combined with instinctive populist tactics that sought to distract from the important stories. When former Al-Shabaab leader Mukhtar Robow was arrested in December 2018 by Ethiopian forces assigned to the African Union, mass protests broke out in Baidoa. Local police killed over a dozen people, but when the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General Nicholas Haysom raised legitimate concerns, he was declared persona non grata. Villa Somalia, aided by CBB supporters, shifted the narrative from co-opting Ethiopian forces to the arrest of a former jihadist, and brutal policing to a story about a UN official undermining Somalia's 'territorial integrity.'
The bruising divisions in Somalia under Farmaajo and the torrents of misinformation and disinformation emanating from the presidential palace took a heavy toll on the country's politics. In that context, the current president, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, assumed power, with many hoping he would restore sober and sane politics to Somalia.
During his first term in office, the phrase 'Mogadishu Rising' came to be associated with Hassan Sheikh’s administration, denoting a general feeling that Somalia's trajectory was blindingly bright. There is certainly nothing inherently wrong with a national message that seeks to bring a country along with a positive vision. Indeed, in effectively countering terrorism, ideology must play a central role, as the current administration has realised-- appointing Mukhtar Robow as Minister of Religion in a bid to push back against extremism.
But at some indiscernible moment, amid the constant messaging of victories against Al-Shabaab and photo-ops of senior Somali officials in military garb, the 'Mogadishu Rising' narrative got twisted. Populism appears to be creeping back into Mogadishu, and with it, open debate and meaningful reflection have shut down.
The defeat of two Somali National Army (SNA) brigades in August 2023 in Osweyne that triggered the collapse of the frontline in Galmudug was not met by sober, clear-headed reactions. Rather, it was initially denied, before Villa Somalia was forced to scramble to delay the withdrawal of 3,000 African Union soldiers in the following months. Federal and military officials continue to obfuscate realities on the ground on the battlefields, falsely claiming to have repulsed recent Al-Shabaab attacks in Aad. It is nearly impossible to learn from repeated military setbacks-- such as continuing SNA shortages of food, fuel and ammunition, without analysing when things go wrong.
Genuinely optimistic sentiments have slowly faded in Somalia, as promised deadlines for defeating Al-Shabaab, liberating swathes of the country, and restoring stability have passed quietly by. In their place, a new nationalist tone has emerged, particularly online, as defenders of Villa Somalia seek to brand anyone even vaguely critical of the current administration disloyal. Ethnic Somalis are called 'un-Somali' or treacherous, while foreign commentators are told the situation simply doesn’t concern them. The platitude 'African solutions for African problems' is again wheeled out to deflect criticism, however legitimate.
Nearly all politicians in every culture will seek to burnish their credentials and highlight progress they and their supporters have made. But when this actively undermines an administration's stated ambitions, such as defeating Al-Shabaab, it will come back to haunt them. The promises of Somali security forces assuming responsibility from African Union soldiers in 2024 will come up against the harsh reality that they are simply not prepared to do so. Populist promises may offer a short-term fix when under domestic and international pressure, but they are no substitute for sober, clear-minded politics on which Somalia’s current president built his reputation.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.