The Imminent Collapse of Somalia’s Khaki Economy
The mandate of the African Union Transition Mission in Somalia (ATMIS) is set to expire in December 2024. At that time, the long-serving African Union forces are expected to transfer their responsibilities to Somali security forces – encompassing the Somali National Army, the Somali Federal Police, and Federal Member State (FMS) police forces. Despite a staggered reduction and repeated delays, serious doubts remain about the SNA's capacity to assume sole responsibility for military duties across southern Somalia. A dangerous security vacuum in which the FGS will cede territory to Al-Shabaab is highly likely. This is just part of the picture, however. With the looming withdrawal of thousands of ATMIS forces, a concomitant reduction of mission support service and financial resources will inevitably follow. Billions of dollars later, Somalia's 'khaki' security economy now faces the prospect of imminent collapse.
The statistics concerning Somalia's khaki economy are perplexingly opaque. In 2017, a Security and Justice Expenditure Review (SJPER) jointly prepared by UNSOM and the World Bank estimated that "USD 1.5 billion per year is spent by international partners on peacekeeping, counterinsurgency and support to the Somali security sector." Subsequent reporting on aid flows by the FGS Ministry of Planning and International Co-operation (MoPIC) offers far lower figures. To them, certain categories of security assistance, such as military aid and the "enforcement aspects of peacekeeping," do not qualify as overseas development assistance (ODA) and are therefore not included in official government figures. In 2021, for example, ODA for the Somali security sector and rule of law was calculated at USD 351.2 million.
Adding to this budgetary jigsaw is the fact that AU military operations are underpinned by the UN Support Office in Somalia (UNSOS). UNSOS provides a range of mission-critical services in support of ATMIS and the SNA, including logistical, financial, and administrative support to pre-draw-down 19,626 ATMIS personnel, as well as 13,900 members of the Somali security forces. The mission is also a crucial backbone for civilian operations within the protected international compound centred on the Aden Adde International Airport, including supplying water, fuel, sanitation, communications, and more. The UNSOS budget for the period from 1 July 2022 to 30 June 2023 amounted to USD 526,933,600.
These figures account for roughly USD 1 billion in foreign security assistance, out of the USD 1.5 billion estimate in the 2017 SJPER. But if the SJPER estimate is correct, Somalia's khaki economy represents over 5 times the Somali federal government's revenues in 2024, and 50% more than the entire FGS operating budget for the current financial year – two-thirds of which is financed by foreign donors. In other words, absent massive infusions of direct security assistance, Somalia has no realistic prospect of funding its national security post-ATMIS.
The likelihood of a security vacuum is only part of the equation. The ATMIS draw-down will also have an incontrovertible, but poorly understood, economic impact. UNSOS support for ATMIS will also necessarily contract, producing immediate, follow-on economic shocks-- especially in Mogadishu, where the vast majority of UNSOS assets and services are located. Many of the capital's leading entrepreneurs enjoy lucrative contracts with UNSOS, providing water, sanitation, accommodation, and life support to the vast international campus at Halane. Although there is little transparency concerning the ownership of Somali private enterprises, nor the contracting processes within Halane, it is safe to assume that much of Mogadishu's glitzy new skyline has been underwritten by foreign aid contracts. And with African Union forces securing Halane for several years, the possibility of its destabilisation should also ring alarm bells. If, say, two years from now, international aircraft can no longer land in Aden Adde, much of the capital's political economy could be upended.
The indirect economic effects of the ATMIS draw-down are even harder to predict. Any depreciation of security across southern Somalia will surely negatively impact aid agencies' operations and donor investments' scale. With the Halane compound likely to become even more siloed, international agencies face the unpalatable choice of sustaining aid levels with fewer checks and balances or withdrawing funding. Entire value chains of project contracts, employment opportunities, and public services – mainly in the capital – would be adversely affected. A large number of high-paying jobs for Somalis who serve in niche roles as project managers and advisers in aid programmes would likely be subject to review – threatening, in turn, a thriving hospitality sector that caters to their needs.
Most of the Somali population is unlikely to suffer the same degree of turbulence. The economic benefits associated with forward-deployed ATMIS bases and Forward Operating Bases are modest and highly localised. But the erosion of security across southern Somalia is certain to be felt beyond their compound walls. As SNA and ATMIS forces have retreated, so Al-Shabaab has sought to increase its 'taxtortion' practices, including in major urban centres under nominal state control.
This will impose real constraints on government efforts to expand its income through legitimate federal and state taxation. Plans to expand its taxation capacity were key for Somalia's reaching the Heavily Indebted Poor Country (HIPC) Initiative that forgave USD billions of the nation's debt. Internally, negotiations between the FGS and FMS over fiscal federalism will become more difficult and acrimonious as the millions dry up. Macro-economic projections of FGS revenue growth in the near term, including Somalia's ability to service new debts and continue its HIPC reforms, will need to be adjusted accordingly.
Expectations that Somali security forces will be capable of assuming ATMIS responsibilities may also have to be adjusted downward, with much of the SNA heavily dependent on the UNSOS administrative and logistical platform. But even if UNSOS continues its support to Somali security forces at current – or even higher – levels, there exist serious and legitimate concerns about the SNA's ability to maintain the military initiative, given deficiencies in command, control, cohesion, and combat capabilities. More prosaically, a gulf of several thousand experienced personnel appears to be unavoidable.
In December 2023, proposals to replace ATMIS with a more limited international 'guard force' in parts of Mogadishu and major urban centres were touted at a security conference on Somalia in New York. Details are scarce, but this may help to forestall physical encroachment by Al-Shabaab on government-held areas and provide a kind of security "bandaid" in lieu of more wide-ranging and durable security solutions. But with the FGS embroiled in an ugly and ill-judged tussle over attempts to rewrite the Provisional Constitution, and federal elections scheduled for May 2025, the political climate is hardly conducive to complex and effective security sector reform. The imminent collapse of Somalia's khaki economy renders prospects of a smooth security transition even bleaker.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.