The Rise of AI and Disinformation in Somalia
Late last week, a plane carrying senior Ethiopian officials was turned away from Somaliland after Somalia's air officials refused authorisation for it to enter. Speculation on X, formerly Twitter, was rife as those on either side of the current Somalia-Ethiopia rift accused the other of escalating tensions and disinformation. Several hours passed as the furore intensified as #NotAnInch, a reference to the perceived encroachment of Ethiopia upon Somalia's territory, trended across several platforms. But as so often happens, the headlines belied a more complicated truth. While a plane was turned away, another aircraft carrying Ethiopian officials did reach Hargeisa.
The speed at which the story was seized upon is indicative of a couple of important issues. First is the intense nationalist sentiments being bandied about online by political commentators. The rhetoric has steadily increased since the New Year's Memorandum of Understanding between Somaliland and Ethiopia and shows little sign of easing. Second, and perhaps more concerning, is the ease with which misinformation spreads like wildfire on social media. By the time the BBC and others could verify the news, the news cycle had moved on, yet the outrage remained.
The great democratising nature of the internet, and particularly platforms like X, plays a particularly important role in countries like Somalia, where freedom of speech is routinely repressed and its media landscape is haphazardly controlled. Without rigorous investigative journalism and press standards, the burden has fallen on ordinary Somalis to navigate the echo chambers in both formal and social media.
Of course, the internet also has its well-documented drawbacks in the age of 'fake news' and the populism of demagogues like Donald Trump and former Somali President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo. And when details of Al-Shabaab attacks, displacement numbers, and palace intrigue can take days or even weeks to verify, the potential for disinformation and misinformation is enormous.
The rise of ever-advancing Artificial Intelligence (AI) programs may further threaten Somalia's fragile information landscape. Without rigorous controls on this technology, and governments are famously slow at regulation, election interference tactics are set to become more sophisticated, and more effective. Ironically, the current '4.5' clan system may insulate Somalia's public from the worst of the AI excesses for the moment. But as plans for one-person, one-vote elections inch forward, AI capabilities race ahead.
Globally, unscrupulous politicians, commentators and information ministries are more than happy to whip up the online mob when it suits their narrative and agenda. Some efforts are surprisingly lazy. A widely circulated 'photo' of rocket attacks in Asmara in November 2020 was actually of a factory explosion in China in 2015. But in just a couple of years, AI has come on leaps and bounds, and shockingly lifelike depictions are now commonplace. It would only take a minute for an individual with the proper program to create an image of a high-ranking government official waving a Somaliland flag.
Photos are not the only depictions that AI is becoming ever more sophisticated at mimicking; voices are being replicated with disturbing accuracy, too. A fake robo-call manufactured to sound like US President Joe Biden was sent to thousands in New Hampshire last week prior to the Republican primary there. The Somali political context at the federal and regional is well known for plentiful political money. Imagine how easy it would be to fund a sophisticated AI campaign readymade for a half-dozen wannabe demagogues? It is also not impossible to imagine a fake recording of a foreign nation declaring war on Mogadishu going viral.
The situation isn't all bad. AI also has extraordinary power to help educate and inform populations without reliable access to education. Machine learning tools like ChatGPT have shown immense capability to process and disseminate information at incredible speeds. For Somalia's sprawling internally displaced person (IDP) camps, where many children are without access to education, AI could offer a lower-quality alternative form of learning. The processing power of AI could also be harnessed to inform communities of the risks of flooding or drought in their areas.
The AI 'arms race' is heating up, with the potential to remake our world for positive and negative. Entire industries and job categories are being wiped out as these models learn at a faster rate than many of us can comprehend. While AI regulation will not come from Mogadishu but from Washington, Beijing and Brussels, Somalia will not be immune to these global media earthquakes and manipulation. As always, regulation and implementation are two different matters. Years or even months from now, the 'story' about a plane being turned back may look positively quaint.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
'Give Peace a Chance' was the title of a 1969 single written by John Lennon, recorded during his famous honeymoon 'bed-in' with Yoko Ono. Capturing the counterculture sentiments of the time, it was adopted as an anthem of the anti-Vietnam War movement in the following decade. Thirty years later, a provocative inversion of the title-- 'Give War a Chance'-- was adopted in a well-known Foreign Affairs article by Edward Luttwak in 1999, in which he argued that humanitarian interventions or premature negotiations can freeze conflict, resulting in endless, recurring war. Luttwak contended that war has an internal logic, and if allowed to 'run its course', can bring about a more durable peace.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.
Last week, a bombshell Wall Street Journal article revealed that Washington was exploring a reset in relations with Eritrea, with US envoy for Africa Massad Boulos having met privately with senior regime officials in Egypt. Any normalisation of ties now appears to be on ice, with the reaction to Boulos's meetings — facilitated by Egypt — having been met with short shrift. But the episode speaks to broader issues about American foreign policy in the Horn and the accelerating reconfiguration of the Red Sea political order, which will not go away simply because this particular overture may have stalled.