Advancing Media Freedom in Somalia
On 17 August, Mohamed Ibrahim Bulbul, a journalist for Kaab TV and member of the Somali Journalists Syndicate (SJS), was arrested on his university campus after reporting on corruption involving Somalia’s police force. Despite appeals from the SJS and being cleared of all charges by Banaadir’s regional court on 25 September, he was transferred to Mogadishu’s Central Prison three days later. Tragically, his case is far from unique. Despite constitutional guarantees of media freedom, Somalia has witnessed a troubling erosion of this right in recent years, with journalists frequently facing intimidation, violence, and arbitrary arrest.
From June 2022 to June 2023 in Somalia and Somaliland, 63 journalists and reporters were detained or arrested, and four lost their lives. Over two dozen others were tortured by various federal and regional security forces. Two media stations were also forcibly closed. According to the Somali Mechanism for Safety of Journalists 2022-2023, Somalia is Africa's most dangerous country for journalists. Since 2010, over 50 journalists have been killed in the country, mostly by Al-Shabaab (AS). Many of their murders remain unsolved.
With corruption and state-sponsored violence pervasive, journalists in Somalia are working in an immensely complex and intimidating environment. Journalists routinely face arbitrary arrest and outdated legal proceedings in military or civilian courts and are often accused, without evidence, of disseminating AS propaganda. This stretches to the highest levels, as seen on 26 September 2020 when former Somali President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo linked several journalists to AS.
More recently, the SJS Secretary-General Abdalle Ahmed Mumin was detained in October 2022 after the SJS and other media organisations criticised a Ministry of Information directive that prohibited them from quoting AS. Initially sentenced to two months in prison, criticism from rights campaigners and media advocacy groups eventually compelled his release. But Mumin was subsequently rearrested in February 2023 and sentenced to another two months in prison by Banaadir’s regional court. In mid-September, SJS and the Robert F. Kennedy Human Rights Centre submitted a complaint to the UN Human Rights Committee over his repeated detentions and harassment.
While Somalia’s Provisional Federal Constitution theoretically enshrines freedom of speech and press, the country’s perennial violence and instability have severely hindered the Somali government's ability to protect journalists. A failure to expand and develop legislation in subsequent years has left a media landscape without a clear set of laws or regulations.
Federal prosecutors still cite the Penal Code from 1964 in cases today. In Bulbul’s instance, the Office of the Attorney General charged him with 7 offences based on the Code, including Article 514, abusing the public's credulity, and Article 219, bringing the nation into contempt. The decades-old Penal Code contradicts both the country’s Provisional Consitution and the 1948 United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. And more recent media legislation has also failed to quell repressive policing of the country’s journalists.
A draconian media bill passed in 2016 faced significant criticism from the National Union of Somali Journalists at the time. Subsequent amendments to the bill in 2017 and 2020 have failed to clarify the vaguely worded provisions that have been repeatedly misinterpreted and abused. Unclear restrictions remain on reporting that contradicts the “national interest,” disseminating “false information,” and incitement to violence.
Investigative reporting of military operations and corruption in Somalia and Somaliland carries particular risks. Prominent Somali-British journalist Busharo Ali Mohamed was recently sentenced to a year in prison by the Marodi Jeeh regional court in Somaliland. The charges against Busharo largely centred on accusations of disseminating information against Somaliland’s military and her criticisms of the judiciary.
Female journalists in particular also face significant barriers in their reporting, including the pervasive threat of gender-based violence and harassment. On social media, female reporters routinely receive threatening messages to intimidate but also to explicitly threaten them with violence, including death or sexual assault, should they pursue certain lines of reporting.
It is imperative that political, judicial, and security officials in Somalia, and Somaliland, publicly commit to ending the arbitrary arrests and prosecution of journalists. Journalists must be able to report without fear of being targeted for their work. In this light, government officials should refrain from making negative and intimidating remarks that put journalists at risk.
One step toward safeguarding and clarifying freedom of speech and press in Somalia is the immediate review and amendment of the problematic provisions in the country’s media legislation. These provisions should be aligned with international human rights standards and the Provisional Constitution to ensure journalists can operate without fear of reprisals.
Beyond just the media law, there is also a pressing need for a comprehensive review of the Penal Code and other laws that impede media freedom. Legal reforms, coupled with robust journalist protection measures, are vital steps. Media freedom in Somalia is not just about safeguarding journalists' rights; it is integral to building a democratic society founded on transparency and accountability.
By the Somali Wire team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
'Give Peace a Chance' was the title of a 1969 single written by John Lennon, recorded during his famous honeymoon 'bed-in' with Yoko Ono. Capturing the counterculture sentiments of the time, it was adopted as an anthem of the anti-Vietnam War movement in the following decade. Thirty years later, a provocative inversion of the title-- 'Give War a Chance'-- was adopted in a well-known Foreign Affairs article by Edward Luttwak in 1999, in which he argued that humanitarian interventions or premature negotiations can freeze conflict, resulting in endless, recurring war. Luttwak contended that war has an internal logic, and if allowed to 'run its course', can bring about a more durable peace.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.
Last week, a bombshell Wall Street Journal article revealed that Washington was exploring a reset in relations with Eritrea, with US envoy for Africa Massad Boulos having met privately with senior regime officials in Egypt. Any normalisation of ties now appears to be on ice, with the reaction to Boulos's meetings — facilitated by Egypt — having been met with short shrift. But the episode speaks to broader issues about American foreign policy in the Horn and the accelerating reconfiguration of the Red Sea political order, which will not go away simply because this particular overture may have stalled.