‘Dan qaran’ and Somalia’s social contract
On 15 June, one month after his election, President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) selected lawmaker Hamza Abdi Barre as his prime minister. Ten days later, Somalia’s parliament unanimously endorsed Hamza’s nomination. It was a clear signal of support for the new administration after a prolonged, fractious electoral period.
On 2 August, PM Hamza announced his cabinet and the government’s priorities for the next four years. The 75-member cabinet – comprised of 25 ministers, 25 state ministers, and 25 deputy ministers – was overwhelmingly approved by Somalia’s Lower House of Parliament. 229 MPs voted in favour of the cabinet, seven voted against it, and one abstained. The resulting government has been nicknamed “dan qaran” – the government of national interest.
PM Hamza’s office presented a government program containing six main pillars:
1. Security and re-liberation [of territory held by Al-Shabaab]. The main aspects of this pillar include revisiting security policies, security sector reform (SSR), institutional reform, and operations against terrorist groups.
2. Justice. This pillar will mainly focus on revisiting the policies and laws that underpin an independent judiciary.
3. Somalis in agreement with themselves. This pillar will focus on developing a national reconciliation strategy, completing the constitution, dialogue between Somalia and Somaliland, and unifying the country’s election system and public registration.
4. Economic sustainability. This pillar focuses on building up the domestic economy, developing sound fiscal policies, and increasing revenue.
5. Social development. This pillar focuses on education, job creation, and essential public services, including responding to emergencies such as the current drought.
6. Somalis in agreement with the world. This pillar focuses on rebuilding Somalia’s international relationships and cooperation.
Like the previous two governments, the current government’s initial priority will be, by necessity, security. It will have two main lines of effort: offensive operations to blunt the advances that Al-Shabaab made under the previous government combined with a whole-of-government approach to preventing/countering violent extremism (P/CVE). But there are also more contentious security issues that will require extensive consultation with all political stakeholders and international partners. These include implementing the National Security Architecture (NSArch), the Somalia Transition Plan (STP) and the gradual transfer of responsibilities from ATMIS to the Somali Security Forces (SSF), and force generation. PM Hamza’s priorities are in line with President Hassan Sheikh’s overall policy.
This has not always been the case in Somalia with the executive branch and it presents a crucial opportunity to have the head of government and the head of state rowing in the same direction, rather than expending their time and energy on palace intrigue and power struggles. The same is true for the relationship between the executive and legislative branches. The federal Parliament must focus on legislating rather than obstructing the executive branch.
While political stability within the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) – between the president and the PM, and between the executive and legislative branches – is essential for implementing the government’s program, Somalia’s federal structure means that there is a third, equally critical relationship: between the FGS and the Federal Member States (FMSs).
All six pillars of PM Hamza’s program are fundamental in terms of their importance to a functioning state. However, they will also need to be implemented in the appropriate sequence. The government must focus initially on security and justice (pillars one and two) and political dialogue (pillar three), especially in terms of completing the constitution. Without some degree of political consensus, passing legislation will be impossible. And unless the government’s priorities are grounded in solid legislation, many gains are likely to prove ephemeral, as they have under previous administrations.
Without an effective military and stabilisation campaign, the government will struggle to fulfil its fundamental responsibility: safeguarding its population. And unless it is able to liberate much of the territory currently controlled by Al- Shabaab, it will not be able to deliver basic services to those communities. But the usual cycle of liberating a few villages in Lower and Middle Shabelle and then watching Al-Shabaab re-take them a few days or weeks later will not suffice this time. ATMIS is scheduled to draw-down thousands of its forces by the end of this year and to completely hand over security responsibilities to the SSF by the end of 2023. If security gains are not made before then and if the government does not produce a realistic plan to backfill the ATMIS forces, it will find itself at major disadvantage against Al-Shabaab – right in the middle of HSM’s term.
Disagreements are common in every system of government, even those with strong laws and institutions. It is therefore essential to have legal and institutional mechanisms, such as a constitution and an independent judiciary, to resolve these disagreements. Right now, though, Somalia either lacks such institutions or they tend to be weak. It is still very much a government of men (and women), not laws.
The new cabinet members have some heavy tasks ahead of them. They must quickly tackle those problems that present an existential threat to the country’s stability, such as drought, looming famine, and a resurgent Al-Shabaab. By doing so, they can hopefully create the political space to address other fundamental issues of governance and the rule of law. A government of dan qaran must work for the people, not its own parochial interests. Somalia needs more of John Locke and less of Thomas Hobbes.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
I stand before you today with profound respect and appreciation for the sacrifices the sons and daughters of your countries have made in the AMISOM/ATMIS/AUSSOM missions to help their African brothers and sisters in Somalia fight the scourge of Al-Shabaab, open and maintain critical trade routes, and help in the state-building process of Somalia.
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.