As political tensions grow between Ethiopia and Somalia, it’s Al-Shabaab that wins
During a recent visit to the border with Somalia, Mustafa Omer ‘Cagjar,’ the president of Ethiopia’s Somali Regional State (SRS), declared, “To shield this area from terrorist attacks, we will create a security buffer zone [in which there would be no terrorist presence].” Cagjar was addressing members of the paramilitary Liyu Police, who had been engaged in heavy fighting with Al-Shabaab militants during the previous 10 days and repelled a significant incursion deep into Ethiopia by Al-Shabaab forces.
Cagjar’s comments run the risk of backfiring, though, and could potentially worsen the situation on the border. First, issues of territorial integrity belong to federal authorities, specifically the ministries of defence and foreign affairs. Cagjar was going far beyond his remit in calling for a buffer zone, which would almost certainly raise tensions between Ethiopia and Somalia. Second, any attempt to actually implement a buffer zone at the state level could result in more hostility toward state security forces.
Diplomatic hackles have already been raised following the recent cancellation of Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s (HSM) planned visit to Addis Abeba and his subsequent trip to Cairo. In Cairo, Somalia got dragged into the dispute between Egypt and Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD). Cagjar’s previous statement on the GERD, combined with more recent ones about establishing a buffer zone, add unneeded uncertainty and volatility as Somalia and Ethiopia chart their relationship going forward under HSM.
Cagjar is familiar with Somalia’s security deficiencies, which make the border a point of vulnerability for Ethiopia. He also understands Somali sensitivities about sovereignty and territorial integrity. In order to prevent Al-Shabaab from engaging in cross-border terrorism, the security services and other state authorities must have a functional working relationship. Politicians like Cagjar need to refrain from interfering in anything that might impair those efforts. Cagjar’s machinations to consolidate his power in the SRS have already made Al-Shabaab’s job much easier.
Similarly, the security forces depend on the goodwill and cooperation of the people who live along the border. Politicians should support residents who firmly stood with the Liyu Police against the recent Al-Shabaab attacks, including by donating food – an especially generous gesture, given worsening food security in the region.
Starting on July 19, Al-Shabaab militants conducted multiple attacks in Somalia’s Bakool and Hiiraan regions, close to the Ethiopian border. The first attacks were on three towns – Aato, Yeed, and Washaqo – in Bakool region where Liyu police units were based. Over a hundred Liyu Police were killed. Regional officials believe the attacks on the Liyu police was intended as a diversion to allow a second force of some 500 Al-Shabaab militants, along with their vehicles, to enter Ethiopia. After they crossed the Ethiopian border, Sahan believes that the Al Shabaab forces intended to cut the main road between Somalia’s Shabelle region and Ethiopia’s Afdheer zone before trying to reach the rugged mountains in the Bale region of Oromo Regional State.
After fighting raged in parts of the SRS on 21-22 July, Cagjar claimed victory over Al-Shabaab, saying that his state security forces, backed by ENDF reinforcements, had repelled the incursion. The ENDF claimed that it killed two senior Al-Shabaab leaders: group’s spokesman, Abdiaziz Abu Mus’ab, and Fuad Mohamed Khalaf (aka Fuad Shongale), a Swedish citizen with $5-million bounty offered by the U.S. State Department, during fighting inside Ethiopia.
At the same time, Al-Shabaab media has been working overtime to highlight their successes and disparage Ethiopian claims of victory. The absence of any independent news organizations in the area makes is nearly impossible to verify either side’s claims. However, on Friday, 29 July, Al-Shabaab attacked Aato for the second time in just over a week. This not only showed their determination but it also cast doubts on Cagjar’s claims that the group had been decisively defeated and cleared from the area. Further undercutting Ethiopia’s claims, Abu Mus’ab – the Al-Shabaab spokesman the Ethiopians claimed to have killed days earlier – gave an interview to an Al-Shabaab-aligned media outlet about the 29 July attack on Aato.
The most concerning thing, of course, is that Al-Shabaab was able to mount a coordinated attack on this scale in the first place. In an interview last week, General Stephen Townsend, the commander of U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM), said that due to over a year’s worth of political turmoil in Somalia (diplomatically, he didn’t mention Ethiopia’s own internal divisions). “Al-Shabab got bigger, bolder, stronger,” Townsend said. “So now we’ve got to blunt the initiative that they’ve enjoyed for 15 months or more.” While lauding the Ethiopian forces for their response, Townsend warned that this was likely just the opening salvo in Al Shabaab’s effort to launch more attacks outside of Somalia: “This is not a fluke…I don’t believe this is a one-off.”
To prevent the recurrence of similar attacks in the future, Ethiopia and Somalia need to increase their security cooperation, especially along the border. Rash statements about unilateral plans to create a cordon sanitaire that would affect hundreds of thousands of people along the border are not helpful. They risk achieving the opposite: worsening relations, and therefore cooperation, between the two states. The only party that stands to benefit from a diplomatic quarrel is Al-Shabaab.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.