Justice delayed is justice denied
Today, 9 June, Somalia will celebrate the inauguration of its 10th president, His Excellency Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM). It is a historic occasion, for several reasons. It marks the first time that any Somali president has been elected to a second time in office in a competitive, credible election (in 1986, Siyad Barre was re-elected with 99.9% of the vote in an uncontested election). HSM’s inauguration also closes the chapter on more than five years of incompetent, divisive, and authoritarian governance under his predecessor Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo. It offers a much-needed opportunity to re-build trust, restore cooperation, and repair Somalia’s social fabric. And his inauguration comes amid various crises bearing down on Somalia, the most p pressing of which is the humanitarian disaster occasioned by crushing drought and rising food prices.
But, as Somalia moves forward, it is also important to look back and try to understand how things went so wrong under Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo. Such an exercise is not just necessary to prevent a similar disaster from reoccurring, but also for the sake of justice – justice for the victims of the previous regime. For the thousands of mothers of whose sons were sent to Eritrea for military training and have not been heard from since. For the families of Ikran Tahlil and Amina Mohamed Abdi, brave women who were killed for trying to hold the regime accountable for its actions. For the people of Gedo region, who have been living under military occupation as they are stalked by drought and famine. And for the many others who remain in inhumane detention centres and safe houses around Mogadishu and other parts of the country, who should be given back their freedom. For these known and unknown victims, justice must be served. As the British politician William E. Gladstone famously said, “Justice delayed is justice denied.”
It is an unfortunate fact that HSM inherits a divided country, with its security sector in shambles, its enemies emboldened (earlier this morning, Al-Shabaab dies mortar rounds with the intend to disrupt the inauguration) and facing a devastating drought. HSM must move quickly in setting up his executive branch. Saving the lives of hundreds of thousands – possibly millions – of potential drought victims is an urgent matter. But HSM also needs to make justice and accountability one of his top priorities.
One of the fundamental rights enshrined in Somalia’s provisional constitution is the inalienable right of human dignity and individual freedom from unfair detention without due process. Article 15(1) clearly states that “Every person has the right to personal liberty and security,” and in section (2) it says that “Every person has the right to personal security, and this includes: the prohibition of illegal detention, all forms of violence, including any form of violence against women, torture, or inhumane treatment.”
Rendering justice is not just a constitutional duty, but also a religious obligation. In the Holy Quran, Surah An-Nisa (‘The Women’), verse 58, it says, “Allah commands you to render back your trusts to those to whom they are due; and that when you judge between people, you judge with justice.”
Farmaajo and his regime violated the fundamental rights of many Somalis. These victims must receive the justice they deserve. HSM must launch an independent investigation, with prosecutorial power. No perpetrator should enjoy immunity from prosecution. Justice and accountability must be served equally, irrespective of what title or office one might hold.
On May 15, HSM made a conciliatory speech after his decisive electoral victory. Many partisans in Farmaajo’s Nabad iyo Nolol (N&N) party misinterpreted it as a blanket pardon for their abuses while in power. And while Article 90(p) of the provisional constitution grants the president the power to “pardon offenders and commute sentences on the recommendation of the Judicial Service Commission,” HSM shouldn’t deprive the victims of N&N’s depredations their right to confront their abusers in court. Healing begins after justice is served.
While Article 70 of the provisional constitution provides some immunity to the members of the House of the People (Lower House), it doesn’t stipulate if immunity is for crimes committed while serving in parliament or before joining the legislative body. Regardless, the House of the People should not be a place where criminals seek protection from prosecution. Newly elected MPs who were involved in criminal activities during Farmaajo’s reign should be stripped of their legislative immunity and brought to justice. The crimes some of these MPs are implicated in include the killing of peaceful protesters in Baidoa; the attack on Abdirahman Abdishakur Warsame’s residence, in which he was wounded and several of his bodyguards were killed; the murders of Ikran Tahlil and the alleged plot against Amina Mohamed; the illegal extradition of former Somali National Army (SNA) war veteran, Abdikarim Sheikh Muse ‘Qalbi-dhagax’ to Ethiopia; and the thousands of missing Somali soldiers in Eritrea.
At the same time, those who committed atrocities should be afforded the constitutional right – Article 35(1) – that many of their victims were denied: “The accused is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a final manner by a court of law.” The legal process must be fair, impartial, and transparent.
It is imperative that those individuals implicated in committing atrocities should face criminal charges and civil liabilities for the pain and the suffering of their victims. As long as they enjoy impunity, Somalia will not be at peace with itself.
The Somali Wire Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
The Federal Government of Somalia’s (FGS) strategy to assert central authority over federal states and enforce its brand of limited plebiscite – the so-called “one-person-one-vote” (OPOV) – appears to be going awry.
Delegates from Somalia's influential Darood clan family are currently gathering in Nairobi, Kenya, for a crucial "pre-conference" planning session. Driven largely by clan chiefs, the meeting is designed to formulate a unified strategy and coordinate responses to ‘fundamental issues’ (arrimo masiiri ah) within Somalia, principally centre-periphery tensions and the future of federalism. The anticipated culmination of these talks is a comprehensive Pan-Darood congress in Garowe. This development represents a rare and significant intervention, serving as a clear indicator of accelerating political polarisation and fragmentation.
Technicians and engineers have long been familiar with a paradoxical problem: how the repair of a specific defect often triggers a secondary malfunction. "Repair-induced malfunction" is a widely recognised dilemma across technical professions, with awareness and mitigation deeply woven into standard training.
I stand before you today with profound respect and appreciation for the sacrifices the sons and daughters of your countries have made in the AMISOM/ATMIS/AUSSOM missions to help their African brothers and sisters in Somalia fight the scourge of Al-Shabaab, open and maintain critical trade routes, and help in the state-building process of Somalia.
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.