Abiy's Probable Coronation
Six general elections in Ethiopia have been held since the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) implemented its ethnic-federal system in 1995. Each has delivered victory to the incumbent government of the day — including, most recently, the deeply discredited 2021 polls held in the shadow of the Tigray war. Once again, with Ethiopia's 7th elections — scheduled for 1 June 2026 — fast approaching, few anticipate anything other than a coronation in a country mired in raging insurgencies, state contraction, and the threat of broader inter-state conflict.
Once hailed as a democratic reformer, Abiy's veneer of liberalism and promise of change in Ethiopia has long since fallen away. And with just a few weeks to go before Ethiopians head back to the polls-- where it is permitted-- the possibility of political alternation or genuine democratic choice remains virtually nil. Instead, it will amount to a choreographed exercise by the National Electoral Board of Ethiopia (NEBE) — one designed to rubber-stamp Abiy Ahmed's authority over an increasingly contracted territorial and political space.
And so, despite bubbling insecurity, the machinery of the electoral system is grinding on, with the NEBE touting the registration of 47 political parties and nearly 11,000 candidates. The majority of these parties and candidates, however, remain affiliated with the government in one way or another, or, critically, pose no meaningful challenge to the ruling party. Those that do — notably the Oromo Liberation Front — continue to navigate deliberate bureaucratic obstruction, and, more gravely, state-sanctioned violence against their officials. Most of those approved by the NEBE, meanwhile, intend to vie for seats on regional councils, not the House of Representatives, which is overwhelmingly dominated by the Prosperity Party. Nor is the opposition unified in its response, with some movements clinging to participation, while others regard the process as irredeemably compromised-- as was the case in 2021, when substantial numbers boycotted the entire affair.
Ethiopia's national and regional elections in 2021 were widely dismissed as a farce by domestic and international observers, not least being held amid the destructive Tigray war. In turn, the Prosperity Party won 96.8% of seats in federal parliament-- not evidence of genuine popularity but rather the product of a rigged and faulty political system. Indeed, in much of the country, most of the 35 million voters who cast ballots had no choice but a Prosperity Party candidate. Part of the distortion also lies with the nature of the first-past-the-post voting model, which employs a 'winner takes all' method to the detriment of smaller parties' representation. While opposition parties may have collectively secured 32% of the vote in Addis in 2021, their proponents received no parliamentary representation.
In June, the imbalances of Ethiopia's region-based political model are likely to be even starker than in 2021, when gerrymandering and repression were particularly acute in the Somali Regional State (SRS) and Oromia but less so in other regions. The country today is poorer, more violent, more polarised and more fragmented than in 2021, with smouldering ethnic-based conflicts ranging across the country. Another set of contested polls won by government allies —all handed carte blanche to repress their opposition —may well hasten the threat of a return to conflict posed by former insurgent groups such as the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF). In other regions, such as Gambella and Benishangul-Gumuz, fraying social tensions and the securitisation of politics may bubble into open conflict as well.
The reputation of the NEBE has taken several more blows since 2021 as well, with a raft of opposition parties condemning the state institution as being wholly co-opted by the federal government. In January, 8 more opposition parties slighted the NEBE's process, criticising onerous registration requirements, such as the need for birth certificates and eyewitnesses. But perhaps no evidence better exemplified the disconnect between people and their nominal institutions than the arbitrary banning of the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) from contesting elections in May 2025, contrasted with the immediate registration by NEBE of Getachew Reda's Simret party last year —a ploy wholly backed by the federal government. The NEBE, too, has been implicated in another recent government plot to disrupt the growing linkages between the Fano insurgency and Mekelle by reassigning a number of contested districts in Western Tigray to the Amhara region-- and thus inflame nationalist sentiments in either wing.
Insecurity, too, is certain to plague the smooth-running of Abiy's anointing, with voting inevitably confined to a handful of government-controlled urban areas. In Amhara, with voter registration now underway, the Amhara Fano National Movement (AFNM) issued a stark warning this week, stating that any engagement with the electoral process would be "considered enemies of the Amhara people equal to the government." After two-and-a-half years of grinding guerrilla warfare, the metastasising insurgency now controls much of the region's rural hinterland, continuing to target government convoys and officials at will. And so has fighting between the government and the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA) surged in parts of Oromia as well, with the Ethiopian military increasingly delegating security to a raft of ethnic militias.
For months, opposition parties have been sounding the alarm about the deteriorating electoral context. Last May, an opposition coalition, including the Enat Party, warned that rising armed conflict and government oppression risked the integrity of the upcoming polls. Other concerns have not been addressed either, such as the detention of political prisoners, the ability to campaign freely, and the deployment of international electoral observers. Dozens of journalists were arrested last year as well, often under the guise of state-of-emergency and counter-terror powers that have justified the imprisonment of other critical opposition figures, such as Amhara politician and MP Christian Tadele. Those parties that do remain-- such as the Oromo Liberation Front (OLF)-- continue to protest against the harassment they are subjected to, be it the bureaucratic burdens imposed by the NEBE or state-sanctioned violence.
And, much like 2021, conflict —and the threat of further escalation —are looming over the upcoming polls. Tens of thousands of federal troops have been repositioned towards the edges of Tigray, with bellicose rhetoric on 'sea access' and threats towards Mekelle unabated from Addis. Though some federal troops have reportedly been pulled back to Amhara over the past 10 days, with Fano claiming a number of victories, Tigray remains on a knife-edge, let alone a region where legitimate and widespread polls could be held in just a few weeks. With Eritrean forces and armaments flowing into the region, the smallest spark could set the whole of northern Ethiopia ablaze-- and, once again, interact with the Sudan's internationalised civil war in a host of destructive ways.
War, though, has not yet erupted, and some have ascribed Addis's apparent hesitation to either a realisation of the dire straits of the Ethiopian army or to the UAE's declining to support another war, which is grappling with the ongoing fallout of the Middle Eastern conflagration. This week, the Ethiopian PM travelled to the Emirates in a show of solidarity with his principal foreign patron, offering support to the UAE amid Tehran's escalatory strategy against US allies in the Gulf. Meanwhile, several of Ethiopia's allies—and others—are making their preference for peace clear, with senior Saudi, Turkish, and American officials meeting with Addis in recent weeks. But as ever, it will be the quasi-messianic leader of Abiy that makes the final call, even if the Ethiopian military and state collapse in the process.
Even in the most autocratic of nations-- barring, of course, Eritrea-- elections are a helpful coating to nominally legitimise even the most unpopular of policies. But this is not an election fought on ideology or constitutionalism; it is, in fact, the worst-kept secret in Ethiopia that the ruling Prosperity Party has little regard for the 1995 ethnic-federal model. Still, it may well be that the inevitable coronation of Abiy provides the 'justification' for him to formally amend Ethiopia's principal political document, likely towards a more centralised model in line with his vague ideology of 'medemer' (coming together). In particular, the National Dialogue Commission is expected to propose revisions to the principles of ethnic federalism — changes that could formalise a significant concentration of executive authority at the centre, at the expense of both parliament and the regions. In this, Ethiopia represents the wider continental trend, with elections increasingly serving to consolidate — not transfer —power under increasingly constrained political conditions.
In a region of ageing leaders, Abiy is a young man at just 41-- and clearly intends to rule for many years to come. And in his quasi-imperial vision, elections, Tigray, Eritrea, Fano, OLA, and his people are mere stepping stones in his unerring quest to usher in a new age of Ethiopian greatness. And if war, atrocities, or humanitarian catastrophes do not give the Prosperity Party pause for thought, neither will mounting accusations of gerrymandering or rigging. But, if anything, Ethiopia's 7th general election is more likely to reflect the limits of the state than its authority—if full-scale war does not erupt in the meantime.
The Ethiopian Cable Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.
Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.
'Give Peace a Chance' was the title of a 1969 single written by John Lennon, recorded during his famous honeymoon 'bed-in' with Yoko Ono. Capturing the counterculture sentiments of the time, it was adopted as an anthem of the anti-Vietnam War movement in the following decade. Thirty years later, a provocative inversion of the title-- 'Give War a Chance'-- was adopted in a well-known Foreign Affairs article by Edward Luttwak in 1999, in which he argued that humanitarian interventions or premature negotiations can freeze conflict, resulting in endless, recurring war. Luttwak contended that war has an internal logic, and if allowed to 'run its course', can bring about a more durable peace.
A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.
Last week, a bombshell Wall Street Journal article revealed that Washington was exploring a reset in relations with Eritrea, with US envoy for Africa Massad Boulos having met privately with senior regime officials in Egypt. Any normalisation of ties now appears to be on ice, with the reaction to Boulos's meetings — facilitated by Egypt — having been met with short shrift. But the episode speaks to broader issues about American foreign policy in the Horn and the accelerating reconfiguration of the Red Sea political order, which will not go away simply because this particular overture may have stalled.