The Second Anniversary of Pretoria
Sunday, 3 November, marked four years since the Tigray war erupted and two years from the signing of the Pretoria agreement between the Ethiopian federal government and the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF). The destruction during the two-year war wrought upon Tigray by Ethiopian troops, Amhara militia, and an invading Eritrean army remains unconscionable and has left indelible scars on the northern region. While we will never know the precise number of those killed, wounded, starved, or sexually assaulted, the best estimates by Ghent University and others place those dead at between 300,000 and 600,000, while over 120,000 Tigrayan women and girls were sexually assaulted or raped during the conflict.
The Pretoria agreement may have 'silenced the guns' and restored some limited services, but Tigray remains in a state of frozen conflict. Life in Mekelle has returned somewhat to normal, but over 750,000 people remain displaced across the region, swathes of the constitutional lands are under occupation by Amhara militias and Eritrean forces, and substantial infrastructure reconstruction has yet to begin in earnest. Indeed, the past year has seen little concerted progress made on major elements of Pretoria, particularly the restoration of Tigrayan control over western and northern Tigray and the subsequent support for internally displaced persons (IDPs) to return to their homes. On the anniversary of the war, the TPLF attributed the failure to implement Pretoria to the "reluctance" of Addis, "internal divisions" within the party and Tigray Interim Administration (TIA), and insufficient international support.
Thankfully, the immense humanitarian crisis that was consuming Tigray has eased somewhat from the beginning of the year, but many remain dependent on humanitarian aid. During the war, the systematic destruction and looting of farming equipment and livestock and the government's denial of international humanitarian assistance to Tigray induced an all-but-certain famine in the region. The end of the war was meant to resume assistance to Tigray, but the uncovering of years-long widespread aid theft by the government in 2023 saw USAID and the World Food Programme support suspended-- and triggered another major humanitarian crisis. The international humanitarian response during and after the war remains deeply shameful. And without returning the hundreds of thousands of displaced civilians to the occupied fertile lands of Western Tigray and sufficient economic support, the humanitarian situation will remain dire.
Meanwhile, justice for the millions impacted by the war remains non-existent. The UN's International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (ICHREE) mandate expired in October 2023 under pressure from Addis, despite its members urging for its continuation amid reports of the Eritrean military enslaving women in Tigray. Its 'replacement,' the federal government's transitional justice model and national dialogue commission, have been widely shunned and contain no capacity for extraditing and prosecuting foreign nationals, i.e. Eritrean soldiers, for their human rights violations. The shuttering of the ICHREE, despite it not having completed its work, has created a dangerous precedent of impunity. It is little surprise that today, there are widespread reports of the Ethiopian army and Fano militias committing extrajudicial executions and other atrocities in Amhara.
Though clearly most intense in Tigray, the reverberations from the war go far beyond the region. It both helped form and shatter the destructive alliance between Bahir Dar, Asmara, and Addis and helped inflame the Fano movement into the major insurgency it is today. It accelerated the militarisation and state contraction of Ethiopia's federal government, while severely damaging the officer class and capacity of the Ethiopian National Defence Force. And the failure to fully implement the Pretoria agreement has had a desultory impact on the possibilities of peace in both Amhara and Oromia. With the already flawed Pretoria agreement still far from enforced, Addis is not trusted as a partner to secure peace, which is partly why the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA) rejected a Pretoria-style agreement in Tanzania in 2023 and called for a more comprehensive political settlement that the federal government refused. Similarly, the US and the African Union, the guarantors of Pretoria, have been largely missing in action since the end of the war and have not brought significant pressure to bear to implement the accord. Beyond Ethiopia, the war further allowed the return of Eritrea, a pariah for much of the 21st century, to the forefront of the Horn's politics. Asmara remains an extreme, destabilising force as it arms Fano as well as militias in eastern Sudan drawn from the Baja and Bani Amer communities.
The past 12 months have also seen a deterioration within the internal politics of Tigray, with a schism within and between the TIA and TPLF erupting into plain view in August. It has politically paralysed the region, with both sides jostling for control of Tigray's future and, crucially, over the security architecture that has remained neutral to date. Some tentative signs of negotiations are now ongoing, facilitated by civil society and religious leaders, but the two competing nodules of power in a Marxist party have left it highly dysfunctional. And with Tigray divided, the pressure to implement all aspects of Pretoria has also subsided as Addis continues its contrary plan to conduct a referendum in Western Tigray to decide its future.
It is hard to fully comprehend the nature and consequences of the genocidal violence on Tigray just two years after the guns quietened, but it will undoubtedly remain a stain on the collective conscience of Ethiopia and the international community that comprehensively and repeatedly failed to prevent a litany of atrocities. Since the war ended, the political, economic, and humanitarian support for Tigray has been far, far below what the deeply traumatised population requires. The Pretoria agreement should be the absolute bare minimum, but even that has been left wanting with attention trained on Ukraine, Gaza, and, within the region, Sudan. The future of Tigray remains deeply uncertain, and with tensions rising between Ethiopia and the latest tripartite alliance of Egypt, Eritrea, and Somalia, it could yet be inadvertently plunged back into armed conflict. The guns may have been silenced, but it is past time that peace in Tigray and beyond is secured and supported.
By The Ethiopian Cable Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.