The New Tripartite Alliance
Just over 6 years ago, in September 2018, the presidents of Eritrea, Ethiopia, and Somalia met in Asmara to establish closer ties and promote "regional peace and security." Months later, at the third summit in 2020, the Eritrean Ministry of Information revealed that Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki and his Ethiopian and Somali counterparts had further agreed to a "comprehensive plan to combat and neutralise... common threats." That so-called 'threat' turned out to be the Tigray People's Liberation Front (TPLF) and the Tigrayan people, with the destructive alliance leaving hundreds of thousands of civilians dead and Ethiopia's northern region in ruins. Today, Tigray, Ethiopia, and the broader Horn of Africa continue to reel from the political, economic, security, and humanitarian consequences of the war.
Last week, the new iteration of the tripartite alliance was formalised in Asmara-- this time not only without Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed but in direct opposition to him. In an eerily reminiscent photo of the 2018 image, Isaias, Somalia's President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, and Egyptian President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi are all holding hands, while a short communique has also been published. Gone are Abiy and former Somali President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo, but the longest-serving dictator in the Horn remains.
Though Ethiopia goes unmentioned in the communique, its absence is keenly felt as the geopolitical glue that binds Asmara, Mogadishu, and Cairo together. The statement euphemistically emphasises "respect for the sovereignty… and territorial integrity of the countries in the region," a clear allusion to the Ethiopia-Somaliland Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that Somalia has argued contravenes its sovereignty. Asmara and Cairo, too, have their own gripes with Ethiopia, and all are seeking to wield the new alliance to isolate Addis. In the aftermath of the devastating Tigray war, Asmara and Addis fell out, with the former hell-bent on obliterating the civilian population. Egypt and Ethiopia, meanwhile, have long grappled over the use of the Nile water basin, particularly the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) that lies in Benishangul-Gumuz and the Cooperative Framework Agreement (CFA).
The hangover from the first tripartite alliance is still being felt. Tigray remains in a 'frozen conflict,' with the impacts of the horrific war certain to be felt for generations. Ethiopia is far more unstable and militarised than it was before the conflict. And Eritrea has returned to the fore in the Horn, having been politically isolated for much of the 21st century. In Somalia, Farmaajo domesticated the tactics of Isaias, seeking to violently repress opposition to his government and court malign foreign actors, particularly Qatar. Several thousand young Somali recruits in Eritrea were also covertly dispatched to fight in Tigray, a scandal that President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud campaigned upon in 2022 for the presidency. Since coming to power, however, Hassan Sheikh has forged a close alliance with Isaias, with his latest trip to Asmara his fourth this year alone.
Little good can come of this latest alliance. Though many Somali nationalists, including those in the federal government, have been encouraged by the support of Asmara and Cairo, as well as Ankara, it only drags the Horn closer to the precipice of another destructive conflict. The site and manner of which remains up for debate, but possible proxy forces could include the escalating Fano insurgency in Ethiopia's Amhara region or the Oromo Liberation Army (OLA). Specific Fano militias continue to be armed and trained by the Eritrean military, and there have been reports that Egyptian intelligence is also considering arming the disparate forces that are seizing increasing territory in the Amhara region. Moreover, there are real concerns that if Egypt's forces end up co-located near Ethiopian troops in Somalia, it could spark a direct conflict.
The most notable proxy actor would be, of course, Al-Shabaab, though it only has a diminutive presence under its Jaysh al-Habash wing. While sanctions were imposed on Eritrea in 2008 for providing weapons to the jihadist group, it is hard to envisage Cairo supporting Al-Shabaab– even to undermine Ethiopia. Still, what is interesting is that while the Egyptian military government has actively sought to crush the Muslim Brotherhood at home, including jailing the democratically elected former President Mohamed Morsi, it has courted Islamists abroad. Hassan Sheikh Mohamud's government is dominated by Damul Jadiid, a small sub-sect of the Muslim Brotherhood movement, while Cairo and Ankara are enjoying their best relationship in years.
The Asmara-Cairo-Mogadishu communique also voiced its support for the proposed Egyptian peacekeeping deployment of troops to Somalia. Yet Cairo remains broke, and though the number of up to 10,000 soldiers being deployed has been touted, both bilaterally and as part of the African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM), there is widespread belief that any number will be far less. Though the latest communique may note the role of the African Union, the alliance should be seen as another hammer blow to the waned multilateralism of the Horn. Yet, extraordinarily, the AU in Addis remains silent in the crisis of much of its own making. The growing discontent among other troop-contributing countries to Somalia, particularly Uganda, over Egypt's inclusion should be another warning sign of the danger of deploying non-regional forces with ulterior geopolitical motives.
If this alliance is about deterrence, then it fundamentally misunderstands the foreign policy of the Abiy government. Last Monday, Taye Atske-Selassie, the new president of Ethiopia, doubled down, insisting that Addis would continue to pursue actualising the MoU with Somaliland. Despite increasing pressure on Addis from several angles, the manner in which Mogadishu has pursued its opposition to the MoU has only seemingly made Ethiopia more likely to continue its course and recognise Somaliland. It is also the diminished influence of Addis as a regional hegemon that has opened the door for Asmara and Cairo to undermine it.
The last tripartite alliance only lasted four years, but it was enough time to wreak immense damage. How long this one lasts is yet to be seen, but it bears many of the same hallmarks of destabilising domestic and regional self-interest. And, once again, Isaias is at the heart of an attempt to undermine a neighbouring country.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
The Federal Government of Somalia’s (FGS) strategy to assert central authority over federal states and enforce its brand of limited plebiscite – the so-called “one-person-one-vote” (OPOV) – appears to be going awry.
Delegates from Somalia's influential Darood clan family are currently gathering in Nairobi, Kenya, for a crucial "pre-conference" planning session. Driven largely by clan chiefs, the meeting is designed to formulate a unified strategy and coordinate responses to ‘fundamental issues’ (arrimo masiiri ah) within Somalia, principally centre-periphery tensions and the future of federalism. The anticipated culmination of these talks is a comprehensive Pan-Darood congress in Garowe. This development represents a rare and significant intervention, serving as a clear indicator of accelerating political polarisation and fragmentation.
Technicians and engineers have long been familiar with a paradoxical problem: how the repair of a specific defect often triggers a secondary malfunction. "Repair-induced malfunction" is a widely recognised dilemma across technical professions, with awareness and mitigation deeply woven into standard training.
I stand before you today with profound respect and appreciation for the sacrifices the sons and daughters of your countries have made in the AMISOM/ATMIS/AUSSOM missions to help their African brothers and sisters in Somalia fight the scourge of Al-Shabaab, open and maintain critical trade routes, and help in the state-building process of Somalia.
Somalia’s opposition - frustrated by months of stagnant dialogue - has for the first time proposed a transitional mechanism to break the country's protracted political deadlock. In an open letter addressed to a crucial extraordinary summit of African Troop and Police Contributing Countries (TPCCs) which opened on Wednesday in Kampala, the Somali Future Council (SFC) said that a new transitional governance arrangement was vital and necessary and is hoping the initiative will gain traction among regional actors who have boots on the ground and share a vested interest in a durable political settlement.
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.