Ethiopia's Isolation in New York
At the 79th UN General Assembly (UNGA) in New York, Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed cut an isolated figure. Acrimony over the Ethiopia-Somaliland Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and proposed deployment of Egyptian troops to Somalia made its way to New York, with Egyptian, Eritrean, and Somali officials all using the UNGA opportunities to cement their ties and critique Addis. Once the darling of the international community and a winner of the Nobel Peace Prize, Abiy has few allies remaining.
The meeting between the Somali, Eritrean, and Egyptian foreign ministers on the sidelines in New York was emblematic of Ethiopia's geopolitical struggles. Once again, all three proclaimed their euphemistic 'respect' for Somalia's unity, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, but it is the rapidly deepening ties between Asmara and Cairo that should be of particular concern to Addis. Egyptian and Eritrean military intelligence recently met in the Eritrean capital, and there have been reports that Cairo, like Asmara, may seek to arm the growing Fano insurgency in Ethiopia's Amhara region.
Addis's reckless foreign policy has helped draw its geostrategic opponents together and offered them the space to exploit Ethiopia's internal fragility. Djiboutian officials, too, have become increasingly critical of Ethiopia on the international stage, even though the country remains highly economically dependent on its southern neighbour. Djibouti opposes Addis's hegemonic ambitions and is frustrated with Ethiopia's rejection of its recent offer to manage the Tadjoura Port-- a blatant attempt to kill the MoU to which it is opposed. And despite the state visit of Abiy to Nairobi in August 2024, the Ethiopia-Kenya relationship also remains frosty. Addis continues to be envious of Kenya's improved ties with the West.
The Eritrea-Somalia-Egypt meeting called to mind the destabilising 'tripartite' alliance between former Somali President Mohamed Abdullahi Farmaajo, Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed, and Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki. Despite repeat, and violent, attempts to extend his term, Farmaajo lost to incumbent Hassan Sheikh Mohamud in May 2022, while Isaias and Abiy fell out in the aftermath of the obliteration of Tigray. Reflexively authoritarian, the destructive alliance sought to undermine multilateral scrutiny and resulted in numerous controversies, including the covert deployment of young Somali recruits to the Tigray war. Whether the Cairo-Asmara-Mogadishu relationship is transient or a more permanent reshaping of regional politics is yet to be seen, but it certainly does not bode well for Ethiopia.
An isolated Ethiopia in the Horn would have been nearly unimaginable two decades ago. Backed by the US and other Western powers, Addis was the unquestionable hegemon in the region and played a central role in both African peacekeeping missions and diplomatic initiatives. Domestically, while unpopular in several constituencies, the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) government's control was never seriously politically or militarily challenged in the 2000s.
In contrast, it is difficult to overstate the challenges facing Ethiopia today. A confluence of growing political, economic, and security crises from Tigray to the newly formed regions in southern Ethiopia has eviscerated government services. Despite major offensives, the Fano insurgency in Amhara continues to gather pace, with significant factions in Gojjam and Gondar launching more audacious assaults on urban centres. Particularly accelerated by the war on Tigray, the country is undergoing a painful process of both state contraction and militarisation that shows no sign of easing. And as government services have retreated, so have the Ethiopian National Defense Force (ENDF) and National Intelligence and Security Service (NISS) become increasingly involved in national politics. Rather than tools of the government, these are active players in shaping policy, such as through the 'command posts' in Oromia and Amhara.
While the International Monetary Fund (IMF) plans to release several USD billion for the federal government, the country's economy remains in dire straights. The pain from the collapse of the Ethiopian Birr as the country was forced to float its currency is being keenly felt by millions. Again, this appears to matter little to the federal government, which has instead taken measures to prevent any widespread protests erupting that could threaten the ruling Prosperity Party. There are concerns that the bailing out of the Ethiopian government may only further compound the militarisation and the rolling back of limited democratic progress.
The deterioration of Ethiopia's regional standing and Mogadishu's furious attempts to undermine the MoU is emboldening and enabling Asmara and Cairo to insert themselves into the Horn's politics with destructive consequences. The irrationality and haphazardness of Addis's foreign policy are clear to see, but neither should Somalia, Djibouti, Eritrea, and Egypt seek to wield Ethiopia's faultlines to further destabilise the country, which can only spell greater problems for the Horn. The bringing of Egyptian troops to Somalia is foolhardy and highly dangerous, and it is a grave mistake that the African Union has proposed they play a role in the next iteration of the peacekeeping mission. Yet, by all accounts, the possibility of yet more war, or proxy conflict, erupting in the Horn went overlooked in New York. The absence of regional tensions from the international agenda has allowed these countries, who many still care about their reputation, to continue their sabre-rattling unchecked.
Once known for its inclusive, solution-orientated foreign policy, Ethiopia has managed to isolate itself from many of its neighbours and elements of the international community, including the African Union in the country's capital. Addis cannot continue to ignore the fact it is under intense diplomatic pressure, and it is beyond time for the federal government to internally and internationally reset itself to address the immense challenges it is facing.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.