Issue No. 236

Published 28 May 2024

The Irob and the Algiers Agreement

Published on 28 May 2024 16:41 min

The Irob and the Algiers Agreement 

While progress is finally being made in dismantling the unconstitutional Amhara administrations occupying Southern and Western Tigray, much of the region's northern territory remains under Eritrean control. More than 16 months after the signing of the Pretoria Agreement that ended the Tigray War, communities under Eritrean occupation continue to report numerous incidents of abductions, looting, sexual violence, and other crimes by the Eritrean Defence Forces (EDF).

Asmara has frequently cited the Algiers Agreement in 2000, which ended the Ethiopia-Eritrea border war, as justification for its occupation of Tigrayan territory. On 12 April 2024, Eritrea's Ministry of Information insisted that the international border between Eritrea and Ethiopia has been "demarcated for the last time in a way that will never be changed" and is based on the Eritrea-Ethiopia Border Commission's (EEBC) rulings. The EEBC was established by the Algiers Agreement in April 2002, with a mandate of demarcating the international border between Eritrea and Ethiopia. However, the EEBC was never able to fully realise its mandate, and the border has remained contested, with both capitals seeking to undermine the Algiers Agreement for their own respective interests.

Today, Eritrean forces are present in a territory which extends far below the delineated boundary and areas awarded to Eritrea by the EEBC. Indeed, a recent detailed analysis by UMD Media, a Tigrayan news organisation, revealed that Eritrean troops are occupying 1,972 square kilometres of undisputed Ethiopian territory and 163 square kilometres of areas that were controlled by Eritrea before May 1998 but were awarded to Ethiopia in the EEBC ruling. Although Eritrean forces are present in territory awarded to Asmara by the EEBC, their seizure of Tigrayan areas violates the very first article of the Algiers Agreement. The article stipulates that the "parties shall permanently terminate military hostilities… each party shall refrain from the threat or use of force," a condition which Eritrea broke when it invaded Tigray in November 2020.

Under the Algiers Agreement, Asmara and Addis further agreed to the formation of the United Nations Mission to Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE), which deployed over 4,000 peacekeeping forces to areas of Eritrea along the pre-May 1998 Eritrean-Ethiopian border. Over a period of years, however, Asmara systematically increased pressure and imposed restrictions on UNMEE. Beginning in 2004,  Eritrea began to increasingly limit UNMEE patrol movements and, in December 2005, expelled mission officials from a number of European countries, as well as Russia, the US, and Canada. By 2008, the pressure had risen to an unsustainable degree following a near-total restriction of fuel supplies and out of fears of risks to UN personnel, leading the UN Security Council to decide to terminate UNMEE's mandate on 30 July that year.

Other critical elements of the Algiers Agreement have been disregarded by Asmara, including the findings of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Claims Commission that ruled that Eritrea's attack on Badme town in May 1998 violated Article 2(4) of the United Nations Charter. Eritrea was subsequently found liable to compensate Ethiopia for damages in excess of USD 170 million. The notion, therefore,  that Asmara is acting in accordance with the same Algiers Agreement that it has repeatedly undermined is patently ludicrous. And though Asmara is not itself a signatory to the Pretoria agreement, the presence of non-Ethiopian National Defence Force (ENDF) troops in Tigray is in direct contravention of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement.

For the Irob, a Christian and indigenous ethnic minority of just 50,000 people, the Eritrean occupation has been particularly devastating. The EDF is reported to be in total control of the Woreatele and Endalgeda kebeles within the Irob woreda, as well as the key supply road that links Adigrat and Irob. The EDF's control of the road has effectively severed these communities from the rest of Tigray– and access to humanitarian aid. The scale of the humanitarian crisis in the occupied Eritrean territories remains unknown, with aid officials having been repeatedly denied access to the areas, but the mountainous region that the Irob largely occupy is often prone to drought, and the hunger levels reported elsewhere in Tigray are believed to be even higher in the Irob woreda.

The Irob share many similarities with their Tigrayan neighbours, but the minority also have their own customs, including a form of communally-recited poetry known as 'Adar.' For centuries, the Irob have occupied the mountainous areas that now straddle Tigray and Eritrea, eking out a livelihood primarily as subsistence farmers. The Irob also participated in the armed resistance against the Italian colonisation of now-Eritrea and Ethiopia in the late 19th century, which eventually culminated in the defeat of the Italian invaders in the Battle of Adwa in 1896. Throughout Eritrea's history of Italian colonisation, its time of forcible integration with Ethiopia, and the post-1993 independence period, the Irob have never been part of Eritrean territory. The Irob's ancestral land has always been in Tigray.

During the 1998-2000 war, Irob communities faced heinous human rights violations at the hands of invading Eritrean forces, including mass displacement, enforced imposition of Eritrean citizenship, and widespread killings. Landmines were sown in Irob villages to prevent the return of the displaced communities, while Irob property was systematically looted. Many of the brutal tactics and war crimes carried out by the Eritrean invaders over 20 years ago were again revisited by EDF forces as part of its modus operandi during the 2020-2022 Tigray War. And there is little sign that the EDF has ameliorated its callous approach since fighting ceased after the Pretoria agreement in November 2022. In one alarming video that was widely circulated in April 2024, men in EDF uniforms were seen ordering villagers in occupied areas to "forget Tigray and think [about] Eritreanness and Eritrea." The military officials also told the villagers that they "have an obligation to provide national service" and that they had "to live the life of an Eritrean citizen." The video and similar other reports of forcible assimilation indicate that the Asmara regime has no intention of relinquishing these communities from Eritrean control.

The Algiers Agreement was never implemented by either Addis or Asmara. Consequently, Eritrea should not be allowed under false pretences to instrumentalise a two-decade-old peace agreement to subject a minority group to yet more state-directed violence. The Ethiopian federal government may be reticent to directly confront its former ally, but the status quo that is threatening the very existence of minority groups is untenable. While international attention is currently trained elsewhere in Tigray, those under Eritrean occupation deserve to be able to determine their own fate and should not be abandoned to a repressive Eritrean regime.


By the Ethiopian Cable team

To continue reading, create a free account or log in.

Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.

Create your Sahan account Login

Unlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content

You may also be interested in

Issue No. 959
Mogadishu on the Edge: The Danger Has Not Passed
The Somali Wire

Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.


10:12 min read 08 Jun
Issue No. 958
Deni and the Tough Road Back to Mogadishu
The Somali Wire

Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.


8:08 min read 03 Jun
Issue No. 128
The US Eritrea Pivot – Opportunities, Risks, Dilemma
The Horn Edition

A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.


34:56 min read 29 May
Issue No. 957
How Somalia's South West Vote Went South
The Somali Wire

On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.


17:12 min read 27 May
Issue No. 956
The Perils of a Grey Transition
The Somali Wire

The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.


0 min read 20 May
Issue No. 955
Averting Disorder: The Case for External Mediation in Somalia
The Somali Wire

Somalia is entering one of the most dangerous political periods in its recent history. An unprecedented convergence of unresolved constitutional disputes, contested electoral arrangements, rising tensions between federal and regional actors, and the growing politicisation of state security institutions has pushed the country towards a potentially destabilising impasse.


0 min read 14 May
Issue No. 127
Total War in the Horn of Africa
The Horn Edition

'Give Peace a Chance' was the title of a 1969 single written by John Lennon, recorded during his famous honeymoon 'bed-in' with Yoko Ono. Capturing the counterculture sentiments of the time, it was adopted as an anthem of the anti-Vietnam War movement in the following decade. Thirty years later, a provocative inversion of the title-- 'Give War a Chance'-- was adopted in a well-known Foreign Affairs article by Edward Luttwak in 1999, in which he argued that humanitarian interventions or premature negotiations can freeze conflict, resulting in endless, recurring war. Luttwak contended that war has an internal logic, and if allowed to 'run its course', can bring about a more durable peace.


27:16 min read 30 Apr
Issue No. 954
The Malian Mirror
The Somali Wire

A foreign-backed president, a besieged capital city, and a jihadist movement affiliated with Al-Qaeda-- this time not Somalia, but Mali. Late last week, Jama'at Nusrat al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM), the transnational Salafist-jihadist group in Mali, stormed across much of the country's north, as well as entering Bakamo and assassinating the defence minister. The coordinated offensive-- in conjunction with the Tuareg separatist movement, the Azawad Liberation Front (ALF)-- has left the military junta reeling, and forced the withdrawal of their Russian allies from a number of strategic towns.


10:18 min read 29 Apr
Issue No. 329
Washington eyes Asmara
The Ethiopian Cable

Last week, a bombshell Wall Street Journal article revealed that Washington was exploring a reset in relations with Eritrea, with US envoy for Africa Massad Boulos having met privately with senior regime officials in Egypt. Any normalisation of ties now appears to be on ice, with the reaction to Boulos's meetings — facilitated by Egypt — having been met with short shrift. But the episode speaks to broader issues about American foreign policy in the Horn and the accelerating reconfiguration of the Red Sea political order, which will not go away simply because this particular overture may have stalled.


0 min read 28 Apr
Scroll