Eritrea in Sudan: 30 Years of Interference
On 13 July, Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki attended the Sudan neighbours’ summit in Cairo. Rejecting any external involvement in Sudan under any pretext, humanitarian or otherwise, Isaias said the Sudanese people could solve their own problems without a peace initiative. The Eritrean dictator has also dismissed the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Quartet (IGAD) Summit on Sudan in Ethiopia as a political bazaar. Yet since Eritrea’s de facto independence in 1991, Isaias has consistently sought to interfere in Sudan.
This pattern of contradiction goes back decades. Sudan was one of the first countries to recognise Eritrea’s independence in 1991, with the countries enjoying cordial relations until 1993. During the Eritrean War of Independence against the Derg regime, Sudan housed the logistical base for military and humanitarian aid for the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front. Sudan also hosted 100s of 1000s of Eritrean refugees.
Yet Isaias accused Sudan of arming the Eritrean opposition in November 1994 and severed diplomatic ties just a month later. Asmara soon lent increasing support to political groups and armed resistance opposed to Omar al-Bashir’s Islamist military regime in Sudan. The most significant of these was the Sudanese People’s Liberation Army (SPLA), which Eritrea allowed to operate freely across its border.
Another instrument Asmara used to destabilise Sudan was the ‘Beja Congress.’ Formed in 1957 by Beja intellectuals to address issues of ethnic marginalisation, the group eventually transformed into a resistance movement armed and trained by the Eritrean regime. The Congress joined the Sudan National Democratic Alliance (SNDA) in Asmara in 1993, an umbrella group for political organisations opposed to al-Bashir’s regime. In an unprecedented move, the Sudanese Embassy in Asmara was even gifted to the SNDA after Eritrea severed relations with Sudan in December 1994.
But Sudanese-Eritrean relations plunged to new depths in 1997 after the SNDA opened an offensive front along their shared border. Sudan simultaneously developed military training camps for Asmara’s opposition, primarily for Islamist groups. Mediation by then-Qatari Emir Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani led the two countries to resume diplomatic relations in 1999.
The detente did not last. Eritrea accused Khartoum of allowing Ethiopian forces to attack it during the 1998-2000 Badme War. Eritrea again intensified its support for the SPLA and various rebel groups opposing al-Bashir’s regime. And in October 2002, Khartoum accused Asmara of attacking eastern Sudan, filing a complaint with the Arab League. By then, the Beja Congress, with significant Eritrean military support, controlled a swathe of eastern Sudan along the Eritrean border. Its attempted sabotage of the oil pipeline to Port Sudan was less successful, but the Congress joined the SPLA’s assault on Kassala in 2002. The Beja Congress was also not the only Sudanese rebel group Asmara supported. A Rashaida group called the ‘Free Lions,’ led by Mubarak Salim, also received Eritrean military aid. Its leader was later accused by the UN Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea of human trafficking.
Tensions came to a head again in June 2004 when Sudan publicly accused Eritrea of sabotaging its peace process at the UN Security Council. In October of that year, Eritrea declared it had foiled a plot by Khartoum to kill President Isaias. In May 2005, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi brokered an agreement between the regimes in Tripoli. But just a month later, Sudan filed another complaint against Eritrea at the Security Council, again accusing Asmara of supporting Sudanese rebel groups.
Relations improved after the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Sudanese Government and the Sudanese People’s Liberation Movement in January 2005, which Eritrea helped mediate. The Beja Congress initially rejected the peace deal, allying with rebel movements in Darfur. But in October 2006, a peace agreement was signed between the Sudanese regime and the Eastern Front, the allied Rashaida Free Lions and the Beja Congress, in Asmara. The Eritrean government sponsored the deal with al-Bashir and Isaias present at the signing ceremony. Beja Congress leader, Musa Mohamed Ahmed, was subsequently appointed as an advisor to al-Bashir. Mubarak Salim of the Rashaida Free Lions was even appointed Deputy Minister of Transport in Khartoum. Asmara had ensured its loyalists were at the table in Sudan.
The renewed relationship was cemented when Omar al-Bashir visited Eritrea in March 2009 in defiance of his International Criminal Court's arrest warrant. Eritrea, under UN sanctions, expressed its solidarity with al-Bashir. Relations between the two wily and brutal dictators of Sudan and Ethiopia steadied from then on, with the two countries agreeing to open their borders in October 2011. Following several years of relative stability, Sudan closed its Eritrean border after accusing Asmara and Addis of amassing forces on its border in 2018. The border remained closed until the overthrow of al-Bashir’s regime in April 2019.
Al-Bashir’s removal in April 2019 ushered in a flurry of reciprocal visits between Asmara and the new players in Khartoum. Eritrea’s Foreign Minister Osman Saleh Mohammed, Presidential Advisor Yemane Ghebreab, and Isaias have all visited Sudan multiple times since 2019. The warring commander of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), General Mohamed ‘Hemedti’ Dagalo, and General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) have also both travelled to Asmara since al-Bashir’s toppling.
Sudan’s conflict has thrown these relationships into fresh contention as al-Burhan and Hemedti seek regional allies and legitimacy. While Asmara has dismissed suggestions that it supports the RSF, the SAF reportedly seized Eritrean military equipment bound for the paramilitary group in June. Considering the history of Eritrean interference in Sudan, and across the Horn, it would be naive to assume Asmara is uninvolved in the brutal conflict. The faster the international community withdraws from engagement with the destabilising country, the better.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Ethiopia’s leaders are fighting a new war with an old conviction: that military victory can permanently settle the question of who owns the state. But the coalition that encircled Tigray in 2020 has fractured, the regional balance has shifted, and drone capabilities are spreading to the government’s opponents. The battlefield looks familiar, but the strategic conditions are profoundly different. The danger lies in mistaking the temporary capture of territory for the resolution of deep-seated conflict, a ruinous road Ethiopia has travelled before; its towns bear the scars, and its people carry the losses.
In social psychology, the term "desperation conundrum" refers to a psychological paradox wherein an acute, extreme, or severe need for an objective inadvertently impedes its attainment. This occurs because an intense sense of urgency frequently drives choices and behaviours that alienate the very outcome that is so desperately sought.
Somalia’s contemporary political trajectory is profoundly defined by the month of October. Within the Somali collective consciousness, October is not merely another page on the calendar; it is the recurring crucible of political upheaval, tragedy and systemic transformation.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has since 10 October been deploying National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) forces, specifically the little-known Public Protection Forces (Ilaalada Shacabka / People’s Protection Forces), in Wadajir. This mobilisation is concentrated close to the home of ex-President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed – a development widely criticised by many Somalis as provocative. Some interpret the build-up as a prelude, possibly, to some form of armed action against the former president and leader of the opposition Somali Future Council, amid uncorroborated media reports that President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has used Abgaal clan elders to relay an ultimatum demanding the disarmament of Sharif and other opposition figures.
It’s been a bruising week for the Somali Federal Government (FGS), headed by President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), whose constitutional term of office expired in May this year. Yesterday, forces aligned with the administration of Jubaland peacefully took control of the strategic border town of Beled Haawo in Somalia’s Gedo region – a lucrative customs post for trade and transit with Kenya. Roughly 1,000 Daraawiish paramilitaries loyal to Abdirashid Hassan Janan – a fickle politician who is notorious for changing sides in a volatile region – reportedly deployed across key sites in the town following negotiations with the previous local administration.
Plans are intensifying within Hiiraan to establish an autonomous "Hiiraan State." This development reflects deep-seated regional and clan cleavages reasserting themselves in local politics, set against the backdrop of a stalled federal process, a breakdown in talks between President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) and the opposition Somalia Future Council (SFC), and an unravelling Somali federation.
Nearly a month has passed since a powerful blast destroyed the home of General Mahad, widely known as Taliye Shub, in Doolow, a political dissident who opposed the government of Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.
While Mogadishu’s elite were ensconced in the Hangar complex last week praising Turkey, berating its critics, and proclaiming a ‘New Somalia’, the country's periphery told a vastly different story - one where "old Somalia," with its deep-seated clan feuds and the brutal calculus of blood and retaliation, remained stubbornly intact.
On 5 September, Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro arrived in the United States for an informal working visit designed to launch a new diplomatic push to cement Hargeisa's rising geopolitical profile. Monitored closely both regionally and internationally, the high-stakes trip carries immense domestic expectations. It represents an ambitious diplomatic outreach by Hargeisa to Washington, capitalising on the momentum generated by Israel's formal recognition of Somaliland in December 2025. However, translating this sudden diplomatic visibility into tangible strategic prospects remains a formidable challenge.