Eritrea in Sudan: 30 Years of Interference
On 13 July, Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki attended the Sudan neighbours’ summit in Cairo. Rejecting any external involvement in Sudan under any pretext, humanitarian or otherwise, Isaias said the Sudanese people could solve their own problems without a peace initiative. The Eritrean dictator has also dismissed the Intergovernmental Authority on Development Quartet (IGAD) Summit on Sudan in Ethiopia as a political bazaar. Yet since Eritrea’s de facto independence in 1991, Isaias has consistently sought to interfere in Sudan.
This pattern of contradiction goes back decades. Sudan was one of the first countries to recognise Eritrea’s independence in 1991, with the countries enjoying cordial relations until 1993. During the Eritrean War of Independence against the Derg regime, Sudan housed the logistical base for military and humanitarian aid for the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front. Sudan also hosted 100s of 1000s of Eritrean refugees.
Yet Isaias accused Sudan of arming the Eritrean opposition in November 1994 and severed diplomatic ties just a month later. Asmara soon lent increasing support to political groups and armed resistance opposed to Omar al-Bashir’s Islamist military regime in Sudan. The most significant of these was the Sudanese People’s Liberation Army (SPLA), which Eritrea allowed to operate freely across its border.
Another instrument Asmara used to destabilise Sudan was the ‘Beja Congress.’ Formed in 1957 by Beja intellectuals to address issues of ethnic marginalisation, the group eventually transformed into a resistance movement armed and trained by the Eritrean regime. The Congress joined the Sudan National Democratic Alliance (SNDA) in Asmara in 1993, an umbrella group for political organisations opposed to al-Bashir’s regime. In an unprecedented move, the Sudanese Embassy in Asmara was even gifted to the SNDA after Eritrea severed relations with Sudan in December 1994.
But Sudanese-Eritrean relations plunged to new depths in 1997 after the SNDA opened an offensive front along their shared border. Sudan simultaneously developed military training camps for Asmara’s opposition, primarily for Islamist groups. Mediation by then-Qatari Emir Hamad Bin Khalifa Al Thani led the two countries to resume diplomatic relations in 1999.
The detente did not last. Eritrea accused Khartoum of allowing Ethiopian forces to attack it during the 1998-2000 Badme War. Eritrea again intensified its support for the SPLA and various rebel groups opposing al-Bashir’s regime. And in October 2002, Khartoum accused Asmara of attacking eastern Sudan, filing a complaint with the Arab League. By then, the Beja Congress, with significant Eritrean military support, controlled a swathe of eastern Sudan along the Eritrean border. Its attempted sabotage of the oil pipeline to Port Sudan was less successful, but the Congress joined the SPLA’s assault on Kassala in 2002. The Beja Congress was also not the only Sudanese rebel group Asmara supported. A Rashaida group called the ‘Free Lions,’ led by Mubarak Salim, also received Eritrean military aid. Its leader was later accused by the UN Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea of human trafficking.
Tensions came to a head again in June 2004 when Sudan publicly accused Eritrea of sabotaging its peace process at the UN Security Council. In October of that year, Eritrea declared it had foiled a plot by Khartoum to kill President Isaias. In May 2005, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi brokered an agreement between the regimes in Tripoli. But just a month later, Sudan filed another complaint against Eritrea at the Security Council, again accusing Asmara of supporting Sudanese rebel groups.
Relations improved after the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the Sudanese Government and the Sudanese People’s Liberation Movement in January 2005, which Eritrea helped mediate. The Beja Congress initially rejected the peace deal, allying with rebel movements in Darfur. But in October 2006, a peace agreement was signed between the Sudanese regime and the Eastern Front, the allied Rashaida Free Lions and the Beja Congress, in Asmara. The Eritrean government sponsored the deal with al-Bashir and Isaias present at the signing ceremony. Beja Congress leader, Musa Mohamed Ahmed, was subsequently appointed as an advisor to al-Bashir. Mubarak Salim of the Rashaida Free Lions was even appointed Deputy Minister of Transport in Khartoum. Asmara had ensured its loyalists were at the table in Sudan.
The renewed relationship was cemented when Omar al-Bashir visited Eritrea in March 2009 in defiance of his International Criminal Court's arrest warrant. Eritrea, under UN sanctions, expressed its solidarity with al-Bashir. Relations between the two wily and brutal dictators of Sudan and Ethiopia steadied from then on, with the two countries agreeing to open their borders in October 2011. Following several years of relative stability, Sudan closed its Eritrean border after accusing Asmara and Addis of amassing forces on its border in 2018. The border remained closed until the overthrow of al-Bashir’s regime in April 2019.
Al-Bashir’s removal in April 2019 ushered in a flurry of reciprocal visits between Asmara and the new players in Khartoum. Eritrea’s Foreign Minister Osman Saleh Mohammed, Presidential Advisor Yemane Ghebreab, and Isaias have all visited Sudan multiple times since 2019. The warring commander of the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF), General Mohamed ‘Hemedti’ Dagalo, and General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan of the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) have also both travelled to Asmara since al-Bashir’s toppling.
Sudan’s conflict has thrown these relationships into fresh contention as al-Burhan and Hemedti seek regional allies and legitimacy. While Asmara has dismissed suggestions that it supports the RSF, the SAF reportedly seized Eritrean military equipment bound for the paramilitary group in June. Considering the history of Eritrean interference in Sudan, and across the Horn, it would be naive to assume Asmara is uninvolved in the brutal conflict. The faster the international community withdraws from engagement with the destabilising country, the better.
By the Ethiopian Cable team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.