Refugees who fled Western Tigray now face war in Sudan
The situation of Ethiopian refugees in Khartoum is dire. Ongoing armed conflict in Sudan’s capital has made life even worse for those who already lacked basic necessities, and for those who were forced to cope with human trafficking, and with other forms of severe exploitation. This situation has become especially challenging for those who cannot afford to find a new home. As a result, many have become urban refugees, struggling to survive in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions in large cities like Gedarif and Khartoum.
The latest influx of Ethiopian refugees to Gedarif, where many had already been residing, has presented a new set of challenges. The Refugee Consultation Forum estimated that there were over 69,000 Ethiopian refugees in Sudan as of mid-May 2023. Local authorities have struggled to prioritize refugee needs and to make swift decisions about where to place them more permanently. This has prevented international non-governmental organisations from building necessary structures such as latrines, and reasonable sanitation being a basic right that these refugees are denied. The lack of effective protection mechanisms has exposed them to abuse, including gender based violence, exploitation, and discrimination.
Many of these refugees have fled from another dire situation in Western Tigray. That area is still occupied by Amhara Fano militia, Eritrean forces, and not-yet-federalised Tigray Defence Forces, often living in what used to be these refugees’ homes. Fano is a vigilante militia, which has committed atrocities against Tigrayans, and made it impossible for many refugees to return home. While there are areas in Central Tigray that are now relatively safe, many refugees cannot afford the transport from Sudan to Ethiopia.
Since the conflict erupted in Sudan on 15 April, nearly 75,000 individuals have been displaced from Khartoum to Gedarif State, according to the IOM Displacement Tracking Matrix. Most of the displaced are Sudanese, who are often housed with friends and relatives, while non-Sudanese– many Ethiopians residing in Khartoum for work-- have gathered in refugee camps.
One of the most pressing issues facing Ethiopian refugees-- across Sudan-- is the prevalence of human trafficking and other forms of severe exploitation. Vulnerable and desperate, refugees become easy targets for unscrupulous individuals and criminal networks. Many are driven into forced labour, including domestic slavery, farm labour, and informal industries. Others fall victim to human trafficking, particularly at border points. Smugglers are currently charging around 400,000 SDG (665 USD) to transport Tigrayans through Al Debazene, a price not affordable for the majority of refugees.
Sudan remains in conflict which has caused internal displacement and secondary movement of refugees. It has severely reduced the capacity of international aid organisations to provide assistance, and the country’s critical infrastructure has been largely damaged or destroyed. This has led to reduced availability of drinking water, lack of fuel and medical supplies, rising commodity prices, and worsening inflation. The International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC) recently reported that approximately one-third of the population of Sudan was already facing hunger before 15 April. As the conflict jeopardises the planting season, Sudan’s already dire food insecurity is likely to grow even worse.
International aid organisations have reported that their offices have been ransacked and looted since the start of the conflict, leaving them without materials, goods, or vehicles, and their staff fearing for their safety and well-being. Many organisations have relocated from Khartoum to Port Sudan in an attempt to continue operations despite the conflict. WFP reported in early May that a total of 17,000 metric tonnes of their food aid (worth at least USD 13 million) had been looted in the first few days of the conflict. Despite such challenges, WFP recently restarted its food distribution in the states of Gedarif, Kasalla, and White Nile.
The challenges faced by Ethiopian refugees in Khartoum and other areas of Sudan require immediate attention-- and action-- from multilateral institutions, governments, and humanitarian organisations. Aside from providing access to basic services such as emergency health care, food, water, shelter, and settlement, efforts should focus on strengthening protection mechanisms, improving access to education, advocating rights, and providing holistic support to survivors of violence of any kind.
The need for essential humanitarian assistance across Sudan was already at record levels before April 2023, with 15.8 million people in need according to estimates by IFRC. As the Sudanese economy is facing high inflation and rising costs for basic commodities, organisations operating in Sudan and offering assistance to refugees are also facing financial requirements. It is critical for the international community to come together to address funding shortfalls and to provide long term, sustainable and predictable funding to national and international organisations operating in Sudan, to allow them to adequately address the urgent needs of refugees and internally displaced persons.
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.