Forgotten Victims: The Plight of Women and Children in Sudan
In Sudan's deeply patriarchal society, women have historically faced repression as well as sexual and gender-based (SGBV) violence. Since independence, the country has witnessed near-constant war in its peripheries, particularly southern Sudan (now South Sudan) and Darfur, in which women have repeatedly borne the brunt of displacement and violence. The latest eruption of armed conflict in mid-April 2023 has once again plunged millions of Sudanese women into instability, who now face overlapping crises of violence, hunger, and displacement. With the conflict only escalating amid stagnant mediation efforts, the humanitarian crisis facing women in Sudan is expected to deteriorate further.
Sudan’s has become the world's largest displacement crisis, with over 8.6 million people either internally displaced or driven from the country. The overwhelming majority of those internally displaced are women and children, making up 88% of the total number. With a report by the UN's International Organisation of Migration in April 2024 estimating that 20,000 people are still being forced to flee their homes every day, support for these fleeing and displaced women and children is urgently needed, but levels of support continue to be woeful. They face several dangers while travelling to 'safer' locations, navigating threats from armed militias to hostile terrain. Even once they arrive, only a fraction of the required humanitarian aid is reaching those who desperately need it, in large part due to the weaponisation of assistance by the major warring parties.
Rape and sexual violence have been defining features of the armed conflict since its eruption last year. Reliable and accurate statistics on the scale of the use of rape as a weapon of war are unobtainable, so the full scale of the violence is unknown. What is clear, however, is that there has been a significant increase in instances of rape, physical violence, abductions, and other forms of conflict-related SGBV, especially in areas controlled by the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and their allied Arab militias. With the collapse of a state presence in much of Khartoum, Kordofan, Darfur, and elsewhere, limited legal protection and policing have also evaporated, leaving women further exposed to various forms of SGBV without recourse.
The Janjaweed progenies have repeated the 'scorched-earth' policy that made them infamous 20 years ago in Darfur, where they engaged in the ethnic targeting and massacre of the 'African' tribes of the region-- particularly the Masalit, Fur, and Zaghawa. Harrowing stories of repeated rape and sexual violence at the hands of the marauding supremacists continue to emerge. Due to the lack of available medical assistance in conflict areas, many of these women have received no treatment and support, and in many cases, have been forced to carry to term the children of their rapists. And with the RSF encamped on the outskirts of El Fasher, senior humanitarian officials are continuing to warn about the imminent threat of large-scale war crimes being carried out against women and children as witnessed elsewhere in Darfur.
Elsewhere, forced and child marriage are reported to be on the rise across Sudan, in part driven by a steep drop in 'bride prices' due to the rapid impoverishment of the country. The education system in Sudan has collapsed-- leaving girls more vulnerable to SGBV and badly impacting children's cognitive and social development. Teenage boys and children have further been photographed in military garb, particularly with the RSF, having been forcibly recruited from displacement camps and elsewhere. The Janjaweed were known to recruit child soldiers during the 2000s in Darfur, exploiting the historic customs of the Rizeigat tribes and others. Estimates of child soldiers within the RSF have been placed as high as 8,000-10,000.
One of the most concerning realities for women in Sudan is the rapid deterioration of support for pregnant women. Pre-war, Sudan's rural healthcare system was already fragile and patchwork, but it has now nearly entirely ceased operation in several conflict-affected regions, with hospitals deprived of essential supplies and massive shortages of medical staff. Just this past weekend, the Women's, Maternity, and Neonatal Hospital in El Fasher was hit by RSF artillery, injuring 9 people and causing serious damage to the building. Across the country, a UN Women report in April 2024 revealed that approximately 1.2 million pregnant and breastfeeding women are at risk of death if their nutritional and health needs remain unmet. And yet, despite the scale of these humanitarian emergencies, just 6%-- USD 155 million-- of the UN's humanitarian plan for Sudan was funded as of mid-April 2024.
Across much of the country, women are being forced to step into leadership and head-of-household roles as their husbands, fathers, and sons are drawn into the fighting. In displacement camps, women are required to both support their families financially and keep them alive with minimal humanitarian aid. Meanwhile, in RSF-controlled territory, some women have armed themselves to protect their families. And in Port Sudan, multiple training camps for women and girls have been established by the Sudanese army, where they are undergoing military training.
Despite the odds, Sudanese women have again emerged as leading figures in community resilience and peace advocacy, leading a number of grassroots initiatives in assessing and addressing the needs of conflict victims. This builds on the eviscerated legacy of their role in the revolution that toppled Sudanese dictator Omar al-Bashir in April 2019, where following his overthrow, they were marginalised in the transitional civilian-military government. Women, and the issues that are particularly impacting them, should be placed at the forefront of any possible political talks and negotiations. In the meantime, greater humanitarian and political support is urgently needed for women, the forgotten victims of a forgotten war.
By the Horn Edition team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.