Chairing Africa's Future
With elections scheduled for February 2025, campaigning is now well underway for the position of the African Union Commission (AUC) Chairperson and four commissioners. This next set of elections may prove to be the most consequential in the short history of Africa's premier organisation. A combination of a growing disregard for multilateralism, intensifying climate disasters, and splintering armed conflict makes for a grim picture during the upcoming 2025-2029 term. Still, the AU is best placed to make a persuasive case for the need for positive, collective action within Africa.
These elections are the second to follow the 'Kagame Reforms,' which emerged from the Rwandan president's oversight of the organisation's institutional reform process. Alongside broader structural changes, these reforms proposed a shift to a regional rotation of the AUC Chairperson and greater gender equality across political positions. The past 5 elections have seen the Chairperson elected from every region, barring North and Eastern Africa. This time around, following a Heads of State Summit in February 2024, the principle of rotationality is expected to be applied, giving East Africa the chance to front candidates to lead the multilateral. The principle of gender parity, however, will not be implemented, continuing the trend of predominantly male candidates assuming the AU's top positions.
Several East African countries have subsequently proposed candidates for the influential AUC Chair position. Most prominent is Kenya's long-serving political opposition figurehead and former Prime Minister Raila Odinga, who appears to have the backing of South Sudan's Salva Kiir, South Africa's Cyril Ramaphosa, and Tanzania's Samia Suluhu Hassan, among others. Djibouti has also fronted a strong candidate- Foreign Minister Mahmoud Ali Youssef- ensuring a degree of division within the regional multilaterals of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development and the East African Community. Somalia's candidate, former Foreign Affairs Minister Fawzia Adam, has also announced her interest, though she is widely regarded as a less competitive contender. It appears certain that the tradition of former senior government officials assuming the AUC Chair will thus continue, rather than any technocratic figure who could perhaps better pursue internal structural reform.
The outgoing Chair and former Chadian Prime Minister Moussa Mahamat Faki has served in the position since 2017, having been re-elected with the support of 51 out of 55 member states in February 2021. But his tenure has been marked by accusations of a watering down of AU principles, a failure to engage with crises such as the Tigray War and ongoing armed conflict in Sudan, and haphazard political leadership.
The spate of coups across West Africa since 2020 has encapsulated the recent struggles facing the AU. The multilateral has suspended 6 countries under the Lomé Convention of 2000, which established suspension as the primary tool in the face of military coups and other unconstitutional regime changes. The AU could, and should, go further, however. With foreign powers such as Russia waiting in the wings to offer military and economic support to embattled putschists, the AU should stand firm in its support for democratic ideals. The multilateral should more forcefully call out the undermining of elections and constitutions in countries such as Somalia and South Sudan.
Consequently, the AU 2025 elections offer a critical opportunity to deliver on the stagnating Agenda 2063, which includes realising a peaceful, democratic, and stable Africa. A visionary leader who can re-focus and re-orient the body towards these aspirations and the AU's founding principles that emphasise the 'primacy of politics' is desperately needed. With many African administrations reluctant to invest in collective action amid the lucrative offers from Gulf powers and others, it will require a Chairperson that has the clout and influence to draw bunkered governments from their narrow self-interest. If it fails to do so, it risks a return to the grim days of the ineffective and paralysed of the AU's predecessor, the Organisation of African Unity (OAU).
Among the issues facing the next AUC Chairperson will be the rising inequalities and humanitarian crises facing the continent. Africa has the dubious honour of being host to the world's largest humanitarian emergency in Sudan-- with well over 8 million internally displaced and millions more requiring humanitarian assistance. Flooding, drought, armed conflict, and lack of opportunity for a young, fast-growing population continue to drive internal and external displacement. With the world set to warm further and many African countries particularly vulnerable and underprepared for its ongoing impact, the pressures on governance and stability will continue to grow.
Economically, the continent is faring little better. Three countries have now defaulted on their sovereign debt, Zambia, Ghana, and Ethiopia, while others, including Kenya, remain at risk. Persistent inflation has driven high costs of living and a necessary reduction in social services spending to service debt payments. The prospect of a rapidly growing youthful population without job prospects is a further recipe for yet more instability. Like other multilaterals, the AU is currently facing major budgetary squeezes, while ever more is expected and required of the body.
Whoever emerges victorious next February, the next AUC Chairperson should be a consensus leader who can balance both continental interests while dealing with the ever-more complicated internal dynamics. Resisting the pernicious influence of administrations that are seeking to exploit countries' internal weaknesses and Africa's mineral wealth is particularly pressing. And with elections scheduled in 13 African countries in 2025, ranging from the genuinely democratic to likely sham polls, the Chair will have to move decisively to prevent any further democratic backsliding. Similarly, administrations should publicly restate their support, both political and financial, in the multilateral to empower it to reassert its founding principles. The coming years cannot be predicted, but what is clear is that the AUC Chair position has never been more important.
By the Horn Edition team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
In a significant symbolic blow to Somali unionism, Fahiima Yusuf Quuje - a prominent Dhulbahante activist from the Jama Siyaad sub-clan who was instrumental in mobilising grassroots support for the armed insurrection in Laas Anood - late last week declared she was repudiating Somali unionism and the ‘Greater Somalia’ ideology, tendering her resignation from her regional assembly seat in the fledgling, Mogadishu-backed Northeastern State of Somalia (NES) and would be returning to Somaliland. A day after the announcement, Quuje landed at Egal International Airport in Hargeisa, where she was greeted by high-ranking dignitaries, garlanded in the Somaliland flag, and serenaded with patriotic anthems.
Today marks exactly two months since Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) unveiled his unilateral one-year term extension. While it is too early to draw definitive conclusions, HSM has evidently survived, rebounded, and consolidated power in ways that defy earlier predictions. A leader whom many had been wont to dismiss as too tarnished to retain executive power beyond May 2026 remains firmly in the saddle, holding the political initiative and dictating terms. His opponents, meanwhile, are in deep disarray. Their cohesion is fracturing, they lack a coherent, unified strategy, and they are locked in a dialogue of attrition designed to wear down their will and force their capitulation.
The Somaliland–Ethiopia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was hailed as a historic breakthrough. In reality, it was a strategic gamble built on contradictions—and its apparent failure may prove to be a blessing in disguise for Somaliland and Ethiopia.
For the first time in over six decades, Somalia has overhauled its foundational criminal law - the 1962 Law No. 5. Now awaiting parliamentary and presidential approval, the Draft Somali Penal Code (SPC) nonetheless struggles with multiple hurdles and will likely face significant objection, not least, from Somalia’s Western partners and liberal-minded younger generation of Somalis disappointed with the new text’s failure to break away from its historical illiberal roots.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.