No More Leopold II, No More Menelik II
The war against Tigray resurrected Ethiopia’s anti-imperialist discourse, to shame international organizations that criticized atrocities committed by the government of Ethiopia and its allies. Last year the Ethiopian government carried out a successful social media campaign that speciously equated compassion for the Tigrayan people with twentieth century European colonialism. Old photographs of Congolese brutalized and mutilated by Leopold II’s colonial army were posted to falsely convey the idea that external criticism of Ethiopia’s actions abrogated its sovereignty. The campaign was picked up by Twitter activists across Africa.
Belgian’s King Leopold II was the archetype of African colonial exploitation. His vast rubber empire financed the ornate buildings and colonial monuments that line the streets of Brussels. It is estimated that between 1885 and 1905, the Belgian emperor caused an estimated ten million deaths, through murder, starvation and disease, to fill his bank account
This was the epoch of the scramble for Africa in the late nineteenth century. However, King Leopold II and his European cohorts were not alone in their ruthless scramble for Africa. The Abyssinian Emperor Menelik II successfully established his own empire in Africa, after securing the support of the colonial powers in his conquest across what is now western, southern and eastern Ethiopia.
In the north, Menelik cut Tigray into two, with half ceded to Italy. The Afar were dispersed across two countries, and the Somalis across four countries.In the south, Menelik II brutally subjugated the people living there. The Aanolee memorial in Arsi serves as a reminder of the 11,000 Oromo who were killed by Menelik's troops in 1886. Adding to mass murder, Menelik had his soldiers savagely cut off men’s hands and women’s breasts, much like his Belgian contemporary.
Menelik's army committed crimes against the people it conquered that included widespread enslavement. The remnants of slave camps that held captives from the south are scattered throughout the Amhara region. A.K. Bulatovitch, Menelik's Russian advisor, was horrified by the barbarism of Menelik’s troops. But to date, Ethiopian universities seem uninterested in exposing this sad chapter of Ethiopian history.
Collaboration between Menelik and his Belgian counterpart took place based on the strategic interests of their two expansionist empires. Fifty years later, Czeslaw Jesman described how Leopold came up with the idea of forging an alliance with Menelik to establish twin empires that would rule over all of Africa. Adventurer Ruppert Recking wrote that he had commanded an expedition for Leopold from the then Belgian Congo to Kaffa in Ethiopia. The plan was for Menelik and Leopold to establish ownership of Kaffa and its resources through a holding company listed on the New York Stock Exchange, with the two monarchs as majority shareholders. The strategy failed, but the collaboration lay bare the true nature of Menelik’s southern conquest.
While Belgium is tentatively coming to terms with its brutal colonial past, Amhara nationalists unapologetically celebrate Menelik II, despite his ruthless subjugation of nations, nationalities, and peoples beyond Ethiopia’s highlands. Amhara nationalism is deeply rooted in the expansionist campaign of Emperor Menelik, which created an empire dominated by the Amhara. Today Menelik II serves as a symbol of this empire at the height of its glory days. Amhara nationalists have erased the dark history of brutal conquest and replaced it with “Ethiopiawinet”— equating the Ethiopian identity with the Amhara identity.
This kind of Amhara nationalism has had disastrous consequences on Ethiopia’s recent descent into protracted and widespread violence. Fano and Amhara militia committed atrocities in Tigray and Oromia in the name of Menelik II. In 2021, ‘Menelik’s campaign’ was organised in Addis Ababa, from which Amhara travelled to Wollo to carry out a mass murder of Oromos at Kamisee.
Belgians have said "no more" to Leopold II. It is time for Ethiopians to say "no more" to Menelik II.
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has effectively entered a 'grey transition' - a deeply fraught and hotly-contested interregnum that could upend decades of state-building and foment greater instability. By utilising the March 2026 constitutional amendments to extend his presidential mandate until May 2027, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has effectively plunged the fragile Horn of Africa state into a profound period of severe internal strain and legitimacy crisis. This legalistic manoeuvre has roiled domestic politics and put Western partners of Somalia in a difficult spot. If Somalia's Western allies concede to HSM's fait accompli without extracting concessions from him on a negotiated settlement, they are likely to embolden Hassan Sheikh.