The Perils of Referendums
On February 6, voters in six zones and five special districts will vote on whether they want an additional region created from Ethiopia’s Southern Nations, Nationalities, and Peoples' Region (SNNPR). If the referendum passes, it will mean that in less than four years under the Prosperity Party, three separate regions will have been carved out of the SNNPR.
Partitioning a region is allowed under the Ethiopia’s Constitution. Article 39.1 of the 1995 Constitution gives every nation, nationality, and people in Ethiopia the right to self-determination, up to and including the right to secession. A request for secession can be made to the federal government, which then is required to hold a referendum
within three years.
This constitution was adopted around the same time that Eritrea gained its independence, which was formally ratified by referendum. That case was different from that of the SNNPR as Eritrea’s referendum determined sovereign statehood. However, the right of self-determination is a founding principle of contemporary Ethiopia, re-shaping it from a centralized empire to an ethnic federation.
The cascade of subsequent regional divisions was predictable. The recognition of each nation led to increasing ethnic nationalism. Since the 13th century, the Ethiopian
Empire, and later the Marxist-Leninist military regime, was dominated by the Amhara culture, which became confused with Ethiopian culture. When in 1991 the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF, a coalition of several ethnic parties led by the TPLF (Tigray People's Liberation Fron)) and the Eritrean People's Liberation Front (EPLF) overthrew the military regime, each nationality legitimately claimed recognition of its identity (languages, customs, forms of social organization). Paradoxically, it was then that some Amhara became particularly aware of their equating of the Amhara identity with Ethiopia—resulting in the emergence of hyper-nationalism.
Carving out more states out of the SNNP could potentially weaken Oromia politically and economically. New units would proliferate the number of authorities with whom
Oromia has to negotiate, especially over trade and border security. Moreover, the breakaway regions of the SNNPR serve as precedent for Western Tigray, also known as ‘Wolkait,’ from the Tigray region.
Following the signing of the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement (CoHA) in Pretoria, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed announced that the issue of the internal borders (specifically Western Tigray) should be resolved according to the constitution. But the meaning of this is quite ambiguous: does it mean reverting to the 1995 borders or, as Abiy promised Amhara nationalists, borders would be settled by referendum according to the 1995 constitution?
Before the recent war, Western Tigray’s fertile land and border with Sudan did not go unnoticed by the Amhara. In August 2018, Gedu Andargachew, President of the
Amhara region, argued that ‘Wolkait’ should be separated from Tigray and annexed to the Amhara region to allow a corridor to Eritrea. Some have viewed this as a possible
reward for Amhara forces joining the war waged by Abiy, with Isaias Afewerki.
Immediately following the outbreak of the war on November 4, 2020, Amhara special forces and militias occupied Western Tigray. A brutal policy of ethnic cleansing there
was documented in a joint report by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. The title refers to the words of an Amhara militiaman to a Tigrayan from Western
Tigray: ”We will erase you from this land.” The aim was to tip the demographic balance in favour of the Amhara in Western Tigray and then legally claim it via referendum.
From the first days of the invasion, Tigrayan men were hunted down and executed Tigrayan women were raped and mutilated. Survivors were ordered to leave the area
within 24 hours. Signs were posted and injunctions were sent to Tigrinya-speakers, offering the choice of exile or death. Entire families fled with only the clothes on their
backs. Today these Tigrayans are crowded into one of 30 camps for internally displaced persons (IDPs). There are 30 of these camps in the town of Mekelle alone. According
to eyewitnesses, there are 800,000 IDPs dependent on humanitarian aid, surviving without enough water or food, and suffering from hygiene related diseases. Thousands more have found refuge in Sudan. Some came from Humera. Some survived the Mai Kadra massacre. Some lost their homes, which were expropriated and given to new settlers. Today Western Tigray is empty of its traditional inhabitants. A referendum of those who took over the area would be unjust.
Elections, votes, referendums - all major democratic events - require a calm and peaceful environment. Ethiopia’s 1995 constitution guarantees the right of peoples to self-determination, whether in the SNNPR or in Western Tigray. How Abiy and his government can fairly address the issue of ‘Wolkait’ remains unresolved.
By the Ethiopia Cable Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has published a new Draft Somalia Penal Code (SPC) - marking its first comprehensive legal overhaul in 64 years. The 136-page draft was first submitted to Parliament in January 2026 and underwent its first reading but the process of endorsing it became entangled with the escalating electoral and constitutional dispute, forcing the government to shelve it. The changes aim to update the 1962 Law No. 5 Penal Code and codify Islamic criminal law (uqubat). If endorsed by parliament and approved by the President, they will formally embed the three pillars of the Sharia punitive framework into the statute - fixed punishments (hudud), retributive justice (qisas), and statutory judicial discretion (ta'zir).
A president does not pay a visit to Wajir by accident. When William Samoei Ruto chose Wajir as the centre stage for Kenya’s Madaraka Day celebrations on 1 June — the first sitting president to do so — he was not merely varying the ceremonial calendar. He was making a premeditated statement about who belongs at the centre of Kenya’s state and who no longer belongs at its margins. The message was not merely ‘taking Nairobi to NorthEastern.’ It was the centring and mainstreaming of an ethnic Somali-dominated region that, for much of Kenya’s post-colonial history, has been treated as a security issue rather than a political constituency.
Somaliland President Abdirahman Irro’s trip to Israel in June (from 14-17) was far more than symbolism. Not only was it a calculated strategic diplomatic play, and a chance for Somaliland to appear on the world stage, but also an opportunity for Somaliland to present itself as a fully-functional state, able to conduct foreign relations and cut bilateral deals. Irro, a seasoned former diplomat, navigated the intricate demands of state protocol with remarkable ease - cutting an immaculate, regal figure in his navy-blue suit. Accorded full head-of-state honours, he laid a wreath at the Theodore Herzl mausoleum, engaged in high-level talks with President Isaac Herzog and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, opened the new Somaliland embassy in Jerusalem and convened meetings with Knesset members, senior officials, and business leaders. For Israel, hosting President Abdirahman Irro in Jerusalem functioned to signal its strong commitment to deepening strategic ties while also countering perceptions of waning diplomatic momentum.
Never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake. Napoleon Bonaparte’s classic rule of combat seems to be the guiding doctrine behind Al-Shabaab’s sudden, uncharacteristic radio silence as Mogadishu’s political elite tear themselves apart. As the ‘government-in-waiting’, one would have assumed the militants would take full advantage of its adversaries’ internal divisions, maximising the propaganda opportunities this offers, and campaign for their own cause. Typically quick to weaponise any intra-Somali division, the militant group's decision to sit out the latest intra-Somali fracturing is intriguing. By withholding its usual blitz of propaganda, the group is playing a longer, quieter game - waiting for the federal house to implode further before stepping in.
While much international attention is on Mogadishu – understandably so - another electoral crisis is brewing in the regional state of Galmudug. Historically unstable, prone to Al-Shabaab violence and destabilisation and wracked by chronic inter-clan frictions and periodic armed hostilities, the looming vote appears likely to aggravate the situation and foment more divisions.
Two days of heavy clashes (3–4 June) in the Somali capital, Mogadishu, between federal troops and opposition-aligned forces have underscored both the fragility of the city’s security environment and the volatility of electoral politics. Although relative calm has since returned to the two hardest-hit districts - Hawl Wadaag and Abdiaziz - and mediation efforts have intensified, tensions remain high, fuelling fears of renewed armed skirmishes. Credible reports of mass clan militia mobilisation on the edges of Mogadishu speak to a conflict that is widening. The militarisation of politics and elite fragmentation over the electoral process have shattered a core assumption: that Somali leaders will ultimately step back from the brink to negotiate a way forward. Consequently, the country is entering a perilous phase in which domestic factions alone cannot resolve the impasse, making neutral, external mediation a necessity.
Puntland President Sa'id Abdullah Deni is unofficially in the race for the federal presidency of Somalia. By most accounts, the regional leader is running again and this explains his re-engagement with Mogadishu after a three-year hiatus. Driven by shifting electoral dynamics, Deni’s decision to re-engage with the centre forces him to confront a radically altered political landscape in Mogadishu. Under President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), the federal government has rewritten the rules of Somali politics, altering the institutional framework and consolidating executive authority.
A flurry of media reports in recent months suggest the US and Eritrea could be inching towards a potential deal to reset decades of frosty relations and a partial lifting of American sanctions imposed in 2021. The news of discreet talks between the two sides, mediated by Egypt, was initially reported by the influential Washington Post newspaper in April 2026 and have since been partially confirmed by official sources.
On 10 May, the Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) unilaterally conducted its contentious 'one-person-one-vote' (OPOV) electoral model in South West State (SWS), directly overriding opposition demands for a negotiated, consensus-based framework. Crucially, the very laws underpinning these OPOV elections are themselves deeply contested: the electoral framework was created following a rushed revision of Somalia’s constitution that many federal member states and opposition groups rejected. The vote, exclusively managed by the National Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (NIEBC), saw localised polling in 13 districts and across 126 poll centres and 276 stations. While 376,212 citizens were registered, actual turnout reached 132,430 voters - a participation rate of approximately 35.2% - with 128,276 valid ballots cast and 4,154 deemed spoilt/invalid. The electoral outcome, unsurprisingly, solidified a decisive mandate for Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s Justice and Solidarity Party (JSP); the governing party secured an absolute majority of 51 out of 95 contested legislative seats, comfortably outpacing its closest rival, Sharif Hassan Sheikh Aden’s Ururka Horumarka, which claimed 14 seats.