New US ambassador and the challenge of Tigray
The U.S. Department of State just announced the nomination of Ervin Jose Massinga as Ambassador to Ethiopia. Ambassador Massinga currently serves as the Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary in the State Department’s Bureau of African Affairs. His predecessor, Ambassador Geeta Pasi, served in Addis Ababa for less than a year.
Ambassador Massinga is no stranger to difficult posts. He has served in Sudan, Guinea and Beijing and was Deputy Assistant Secretary for Pakistan Affairs in the State Department’s Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs. His appointment to Addis comes after the signing of the Agreement for Lasting Peace through a Permanent Cessation of Hostilities (the CoHA) between the federal government of Ethiopia and the regional government of Ethiopia’s Tigray region, as shepherded by US Special Envoy to the Horn of Africa Ambassador Mike Hammer.
Despite the CoHA and media reporting on starvation, atrocities and displacement in Tigray, not much has yet changed there. Humanitarian aid, according to expert reports, has scaled up but not enough. The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Aid (OCHA) this aid is "still inadequate to meet vast needs." Medical supplies have trickled into Tigray, where the entire public healthcare system—from small rural clinics to hospitals— was completely destroyed mainly by Eritrean and Ethiopian forces. Public services, such as water electricity and telecommunications, are slowly being restored in some parts of the region, yet large parts of the region remain dark and isolated. Although flights to and from the towns of Mekelle and Shire have been restored, there are numerous accounts on social media of Tigrayan men being refused boarding despite having tickets.
Especially concerning is the continuing presence of Eritrean forces and Amhara militia in Tigray. War crimes against the Tigrayan people committed over the past two years have included murder, rape, torture and looting. The challenges facing Ambassador Massinga are many and extraordinarily daunting.
The US government has taken a feckless approach to managing its relationship with the Ethiopian administration. Long wary of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF), Washington jumped at the opportunity to support Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, sending in advisers on Day One. While loudly proclaiming Ethiopia’s sovereignty in response to US pressure to stop the war, the premier was also eager to fall under President Vladimir Putin’s influence. Even so, the US continued to support Abiy despite evidence of war crimes in Tigray.
If the current situation in Tigray is, at best, not worsening, the one in Abiy’s home region of Oromia is blowing up. The Ethiopian National Defense Forces (ENDF) recently announced renewed military operations against the rebel Oromo Liberation Army (OLA). So bad is the situation that last month, legislators from Abiy’s own ruling Prosperity Party sent him a letter, demanding an end to the conflict in Oromia and start of peace talks with the OLA. The
Oromia regional government however ruled out negotiating with the OLA.
The appointment of a new U.S. ambassador to Ethiopia offers some hope to a country teetering on collapse, a fall that would pull down the entire region. Ambassador Massinga, a career diplomat with extensive experience in global hot spots, needs to show imagination in navigating Ethiopia’s complex political terrain.
For starters, the ambassador needs to recognise the clear and present danger of the continued presence of Eritrean troops in Tigray. Washington has soft tools to pressure the Eritrean government to leave Tigray. Eritrea does not often respond to diplomacy. Washington needs to stop allowing pro-Asmara Eritreans in the US to raise funds for the Tigray war. The US also needs to stop allowing the illegal 2% tax on Eritreans living in the country. Washington also needs to broaden its sanctions to include any and all Eritrean high officials and businesspersons supporting the war against Tigray. The US should use all means at its disposal to choke the Eritrean government and its military until it completely disengages from Tigray.
Ambassador Massinga needs to take a hands-on approach to advocating for US financial assistance to stabilise Ethiopia and, moreover, to rebuild Tigray. Aid to Ethiopia should be conditioned on greater transparency and accountability of the government. Premier Abiy has fallen short of his promised reforms and has, instead, slipped into the uniform of the stereotypical strong man. An increasingly oppressive state apparatus guarantees continued conflict throughout the country, staging the scene for state collapse. It is risky to channel assistance to Tigray through the federal government. The US needs to bypass the Ethiopian government and provide direct aid to the region through the regional government and local NGOs.
Ethiopia’s justice system does not have the political independence to dispense fair and speedy justice to perpetrators of war crimes and crimes against humanity. Ambassador Massinga should work with the international community to champion an appropriate mechanism to deliver justice to the Tigrayan people. Without justice, there is no peace.
By the Ethiopia Cable Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Every political system generates its own distinctive catchphrases, slogans, and metaphors, and Somalia is no exception. Indeed, the administration of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has proven to be one of the country's most prolific creators of political branding. Among the most notable was the aspirational slogan "Soomali heshiis ah dunida naheshiis la ah" (Somalia at peace with itself and with the world). Always more ideal than reality, the phrase now rings hollow at a time when the nation remains deeply fractured internally and relations with regional neighbours have grown increasingly frosty. Similarly, the Simón Bolívar-style moniker "Dal xoreeye" (The Liberator) feels intensely contradicted by reality as significant swathes of the country risk reverting to Al-Shabaab control. Other slogans, such as "Birmade" and "Dan Qaran", have likewise been quietly discarded.
Ethiopia’s leaders are fighting a new war with an old conviction: that military victory can permanently settle the question of who owns the state. But the coalition that encircled Tigray in 2020 has fractured, the regional balance has shifted, and drone capabilities are spreading to the government’s opponents. The battlefield looks familiar, but the strategic conditions are profoundly different. The danger lies in mistaking the temporary capture of territory for the resolution of deep-seated conflict, a ruinous road Ethiopia has travelled before; its towns bear the scars, and its people carry the losses.
In social psychology, the term "desperation conundrum" refers to a psychological paradox wherein an acute, extreme, or severe need for an objective inadvertently impedes its attainment. This occurs because an intense sense of urgency frequently drives choices and behaviours that alienate the very outcome that is so desperately sought.
Somalia’s contemporary political trajectory is profoundly defined by the month of October. Within the Somali collective consciousness, October is not merely another page on the calendar; it is the recurring crucible of political upheaval, tragedy and systemic transformation.
The Federal Government of Somalia (FGS) has since 10 October been deploying National Intelligence and Security Agency (NISA) forces, specifically the little-known Public Protection Forces (Ilaalada Shacabka / People’s Protection Forces), in Wadajir. This mobilisation is concentrated close to the home of ex-President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed – a development widely criticised by many Somalis as provocative. Some interpret the build-up as a prelude, possibly, to some form of armed action against the former president and leader of the opposition Somali Future Council, amid uncorroborated media reports that President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) has used Abgaal clan elders to relay an ultimatum demanding the disarmament of Sharif and other opposition figures.
It’s been a bruising week for the Somali Federal Government (FGS), headed by President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM), whose constitutional term of office expired in May this year. Yesterday, forces aligned with the administration of Jubaland peacefully took control of the strategic border town of Beled Haawo in Somalia’s Gedo region – a lucrative customs post for trade and transit with Kenya. Roughly 1,000 Daraawiish paramilitaries loyal to Abdirashid Hassan Janan – a fickle politician who is notorious for changing sides in a volatile region – reportedly deployed across key sites in the town following negotiations with the previous local administration.
Plans are intensifying within Hiiraan to establish an autonomous "Hiiraan State." This development reflects deep-seated regional and clan cleavages reasserting themselves in local politics, set against the backdrop of a stalled federal process, a breakdown in talks between President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud (HSM) and the opposition Somalia Future Council (SFC), and an unravelling Somali federation.
Nearly a month has passed since a powerful blast destroyed the home of General Mahad, widely known as Taliye Shub, in Doolow, a political dissident who opposed the government of Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.
While Mogadishu’s elite were ensconced in the Hangar complex last week praising Turkey, berating its critics, and proclaiming a ‘New Somalia’, the country's periphery told a vastly different story - one where "old Somalia," with its deep-seated clan feuds and the brutal calculus of blood and retaliation, remained stubbornly intact.