Former Al-Shabaab commander Mukhtar Robow “Abu Mansur” has broken his silence in an interview with VOA Somali journalist Harun Maruf, speaking about his political ambitions and the harsh conditions of his detention since 2018. Despite being held without formal charges and denied outside contact, Robow remains committed to his goal of serving the Somali people. His arrest, carried out with Ethiopian troop assistance, sparked deadly protests in Baidoa and international condemnation. Critics argue that his case exemplifies Somalia’s selective and opaque approach to militant rehabilitation, where political motives outweigh genuine reintegration efforts. Robow’s strong clan backing and pragmatic Salafi stance make him a unique figure compared to other detained jihadists, such as Hassan Dahir Aweys. His attempted run for president of South West State in 2018 was blocked by the federal government, allegedly to prevent him from becoming a threat to both Mogadishu and Al-Shabaab’s ideological narrative. Somalia’s rehabilitation programme, known as “Serendi,” has been widely criticised as ineffective, serving intelligence purposes more than true de-radicalisation. Robow’s reappearance raises questions about his political future and whether the government will genuinely engage him or continue using him as a pawn in Somalia’s complex political game.
Somali social media has been abuzz with claims that Al-Shabaab spokesman Sheikh Ali Dheere may be flown to Qatar for cancer treatment. While unconfirmed, the rumors echo past cases where high-profile militants, such as Mohamed Sa’id ‘Atom,’ defected and found refuge in Doha. Observers suggest such moves could encourage further defections, though past examples like Mukhtar Roobow’s detention show uneven treatment of former leaders. Qatar’s involvement raises questions about its role as a potential mediator between Somalia’s Federal Government (FGS) and Al-Shabaab. Drawing on its history of brokering talks in conflict zones like Afghanistan, Doha could use such gestures to signal openness to dialogue. However, critics warn this would be a strategic mistake. Negotiating from a position of weakness risks legitimizing Al-Shabaab, whose power often stems more from Somalia’s fragmented governance than from ideological unity.