Museveni's Long Arm and Militarised Statecraft
Peacekeepers in Somalia, tackling the Daesh-linked Allied Democratic Forces (ADF) in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), securing Juba from a supposed rebel threat-- the Ugandan military certainly has spread itself widely. But is it all as it seems? Kampala likes to cast itself as the 'big brother' of the Great Lakes region, a more stable and secure interlocutor for both the West and Middle Powers than its neighbours. Just in recent weeks, Ugandan forces have spearheaded military operations against Al-Shabaab in Lower Shabelle, Somalia, recapturing several bridge towns – although of dubious strategic value. But it also ruthlessly extracts lumber and minerals in neighbouring South Sudan and the DRC, verging on an irredentist security policy masked by the fragility of these unstable frontier economies. Fused with the government and today led by the mercurial Muhoozi Kainerugaba– the son of President Yoweri Museveni, the Ugandan People's Defence Forces (UPDF) is more than the sum of its parts.
Since the mid-1980s, with the ascension of Museveni to the Ugandan presidency, the UPDF has been at the centre of his consolidation of power, both at home and in neighbouring countries, for the now 80-year-old former guerrilla leader. Excursions into Uganda's neighbours have generally followed a tried-and-tested method of securing a buffer zone against external threats coupled with mass resource extraction. In particular, amid years of conflict with the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), led by Joseph Kony, which sought to unseat Museveni, the UPDF deployed significant numbers of troops into the territory of then-southern Sudan, as well as the DRC. Amidst this conflict, the Ugandan military developed a well-founded reputation for expeditionary competence, but not always without controversy. In 2022, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that Uganda was liable for reparations at a cost of USD 325 million to the DRC for its violations of international law during its occupation of particularly Ituri in the late 1990s and early 2000s. Human rights violations further accompanied several of the larger military campaigns led by the Ugandans in the hunt for the LRA.
The much-documented voracious and destructive exploitation of the DRC's vast natural wealth dates back centuries, particularly under the Belgian colonial rule of Leopold II. Fast forward to today, many of the same dynamics-- albeit with greater targeting of particular rare earth minerals-- continue to play out, with a host of actors operating violent proxies within eastern DRC. Perhaps the best-known and certainly what has generated the headlines of recent months are the Rwandan-backed M23 rebels, who seized the city of Goma and a string of towns earlier this year. M23 —and others —have relentlessly and violently mined the DRC for its natural wealth, before exporting it through Kigali and onto international markets for ample profits. And yet much overlooked, the Ugandan military carried out similar operations in the late 1990s, as well as under 'Operation Shujaa' today, in eastern DRC.
Following the series of ADF bombings in Kampala in 2021, Uganda launched the Shujaa campaign with the consent of Kinshasa. Intended to secure road corridors and dismantle ADF camps, there has been a notable lack of active engagement with the Islamist group-- which continues to adapt and develop new military capabilities. Though perhaps less ostentatious in their resource extraction and civilian violence than their Rwandan counterparts, Ugandan military deployments are similarly anchored in rent-seeking behaviours under the partial guise of security-driven peacekeeping. Seemingly legitimate counter-insurgency rationale, such as the threat of Daesh, is blended with Kampala's own irredentist, commercial, and political ambitions.
Control of arable land and gold are pre-eminent in the Ugandan-formed resource extractive frontier economies, with the latter bountiful in Ituri and Kivu and often refined or traded through Uganda and exported onwards. It is not exclusively Ugandan forces carrying out the extraction, but they have helped forge the environment in which intermediary companies operate for Kampala's benefit. Though data on the scale of such murky extraction is difficult to ascertain, evidence such as the new Chinese-owned 'Wagagi plant' points to a burgeoning refinement sector that outstrips Uganda's own domestic gold production. And in 2022, the owner of the African Gold Refinery company in Uganda was sanctioned by the US for their involvement in illicit DRC gold networks. All the while, there remains minimal actual confrontation between the UPDF and the ADF itself. For why would they undermine the purpose for which they were first permitted to operate within the DRC?
South Sudan is another, far more controversial site of repeated Ugandan military intervention. In 2013, Ugandan special forces deployed to Juba amidst the outbreak of civil war between the Kiir regime and Riek Machar's forces, among others, on behalf of their South Sudanese allies. Eventually, under a peace accord, the UPDF withdrew, but the close partnership between Kampala and Juba has endured-- as has the Ugandan presence near and within South Sudan, economically developed. Under the Kiir government, Juba has been reduced to a criminal enterprise, a privatised state in the hands of a handful of individuals where access to the levers of power is tied to the levers of finance, with the licit and illicit economies entirely blurred. Ugandan elite happily operate in this milieu. South Sudan is one of the principal export markets for Uganda, which dispatches construction materials and foodstuffs to the neighbouring impoverished country. But Ugandan forces routinely cross over into South Sudan as well and operate with near-total impunity to collect resources and protect Ugandan farms within their neighbour's sovereign territory. In July, this triggered deadly clashes between South Sudanese and Ugandan forces, while opposition parliamentarians in Juba have repeatedly protested such infringements.
Then, earlier this year in March, the Salva Kiir regime launched yet another offensive against the supposed 'bases' of the White Army in Nasir County, the rudimentary coalition of Nuer self-defence militias that has long resisted Juba's reach. It was a poorly-disguised massacre, with incendiary bombs dropped on villages and towns without the barest of justifications and to reassert control over the profitable checkpoint economy. And the UPDF-- ever the trustworthy ally of the Kiir government-- were drafted in as well, with special forces deployed to and near the capital and warplanes strafing 'rebel' positions. However, another interesting story emerged alongside this in a July New Humanitarian article, detailing the collaboration between Fogbow, a deeply suspect US 'humanitarian' organisation, and BAR Aviation, a Ugandan company affiliated with the UPDF, which supplied planes used for aid drops into Nasir. The concerning, incestuous relationship developing between dubious humanitarian work, military offensives, and resource extraction points to a new world order that is anything but brave.
The final case study of Ugandan military interventions, which defies the stereotype of interventions in its neighbours, is the successive African Union peacekeeping operations in Somalia. One of the largest contingents under the African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM) and tasked with defending Sector 1 that incorporates Mogadishu, the UPDF have established itself as one of the more competent foreign forces in the unstable country today. Not only that, but Museveni has repeatedly intervened in the political context of Somalia, summoning both President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud and his predecessor to Kampala to explain their calamitous military decision-making that has empowered Al-Shabaab in turn. Following the Troop Contributing Countries (TCCs) summit in April, Kampala subsequently increased its bilateral forces serving in 'Operation Silent Storm' in Lower Shabelle, seemingly without international recompense. Such operations have not come without costs, with several notable bombings carried out by Al-Shabaab inflicting dozens of casualties on Ugandan soldiers. And in 2023, the overrunning of the Bulo Marer UPDF base by the jihadists triggered significant recriminations at home. Unlike Kenya and Ethiopia, Uganda has naturally far fewer vested interests within Somalia, and its involvement within the peacekeeping mission perhaps points to a broader concern of regional stability in the Horn of Africa.
Marrying these different visions of Uganda's force projection is complex, but Kampala is more than a rapacious resource-extractor or destabilising presence. Many of the geopolitical roads of the region run through Kampala, which continues to wield considerable clout on the international stage despite sullied Western ties over LGBTQ+ and democratic repression. But what is clear is that Kampala appears content to ruthlessly pursue its own particular and distinct interests under various guises, routinely framed within a peacekeeping or stabilising rhetoric and operations. And in a region certain to continue wrestling with political upheaval and transitions for some time to come, Uganda's militarised statecraft and UPDF expeditions are likely to continue quietly playing a double-handed role.
The Horn Edition Team
Gain unlimited access to all our Editorials. Unlock Full Access to Our Expert Editorials — Trusted Insights, Unlimited Reading.
Create your Sahan account LoginUnlock lifetime access to all our Premium editorial content
Apathy pervades the Djiboutian population. A week tomorrow, on April 10, the country will head to the polls, with President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh seeking a 6th— essentially uncontested — term in office. With his coronation inevitable, his family's dynastic rule over this rentier city-state will be extended once more. But in a region wracked by armed conflict and geopolitical contestation, the ageing Guelleh's capacity to manage the familial, ethnic, and regional fractures within and without grows ever more complicated. And Djibouti's apparent stability is no product of institutional strength, but rather an increasingly fractious balance of external rents and coercive control-- underpinned by geopolitical relevance.
In early 1987, the commander of the Sudanese People's Liberation Army/Movement (SPLA/M), John Garang, is reported to have issued a radio order, instructing his field officers to gather children to be dispatched to Ethiopia for military training. Garang's command conveyed the rebels' institutionalisation of a well-established practice of child soldiering; a dynamic that has been reproduced by virtually every major armed actor in Sudan-- and later South Sudan-- since independence. Today, as war has continued to ravage and metastasise across Sudan, few communities and children have been left untouched by the ruinous violence.
The history of the contemporary Horn of Africa is littered with abandoned and abrogated peace agreements-- as well as a handful of successes. A petri dish (or Pandora's box) of issues related to sovereignty, inter- and intra-state conflict, and the nature of the state itself, the region has also been a laboratory for numerous forms of peacemaking and dealmaking. Yet in such a fractured regional order, 'peace' and 'conflict' should not be considered binaries, but rather as part of a sliding scale, where civilians may be targeted during the active fighting in South Sudan or suffer as part of a 'negative peace' in Tigray. Today, with predatory peace in South Sudan, Sudan, and perhaps now Tigray, having given way to renewed violence on a broad scale, what is the nature and future of peacemaking in the Horn of Africa?
Once on the US-designated terrorist sanctions list, it is unsurprisingly rather difficult to come off it. And with the US designating the 'Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood' as terrorists, elements of Khartoum's military government may now have the dubious honour of being on it twice. First time out in 1993, Khartoum was deemed a US State Sponsor of Terror in the wake of a raft of jihadist plots linked to the Islamist authorities in Sudan. Nearly three decades later, and only after Sudan's partial ascension to the Abraham Accords, the title and punishing sanctions were lifted for the civilian-military transitional government. Today, though the warring Sudan is no longer home to an Osama bin Laden or Carlos the Jackal, a US labelling of 'terrorist' has returned to Khartoum.
At the end of February, Ethiopian PM Abiy Ahmed departed on a rather unusual visit to Baku, Azerbaijan. Slated as a meeting between two emerging powers, a focus on trade and investment frameworks was particularly emphasised by Foreign Minister Gedion Timotheos. More importantly, of course, was the signing of a comprehensive defence agreement by the two countries on 27 February. Spanning drone technology, armoured vehicles, artillery shell production, and air defence, the new agreement builds upon a framework from November 2025, which also included reference to refurbishing T-72 tanks, electronic warfare, and military-industrial manufacturing. Though war has not yet returned to Tigray as many feared, Abiy's vision of a militarised domestic —and regional —posture no doubt requires more hardware.
Earlier this month, dozens of heads of state and government gathered in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, for the 39th Ordinary Session of the Assembly of the African Union (AU). The theme of this summit prioritised water security and sanitation, discussing various ways to address these issues amid the unrelenting climate crisis. A worthy subject, no doubt, but the geopolitical backdrop of the summit remains unremittingly grim. Taking place in Addis —amid war looking ever more likely in Tigray —the gathering of leaders again served to uncomfortably emphasise the decline of the AU.
The Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in Sudan, the Puntland Maritime Police Force in Somalia, or the Liyu Police in Ethiopia are far from isolated curiosities or aberrations of the modern security state in the Horn of Africa. Quite the opposite; each example of these 'paramilitary groups' are part of a longer tale, a reflection of the persistent outsourcing and politicisation of violence in the region. With no state historically able to exercise a monopoly of force, paramilitaries and parallel security structures have routinely sprung from the elite to mediate their authority, 'coup-proof' their regimes, and to deliberately fragment coercive power. But historical variation within and between the litany of paramilitary forces in the Horn is vast, spanning a wide breadth of political aims and ambitions, territories, armaments, and compositions. And yet, the results are often decidedly mixed, as perhaps best evidenced by the destruction of Sudan's ongoing war.
One merely has to drive a few miles down the sweltering tarmac road past the town of Isiolo to encounter the Kenyan army. Small Kenyan Defence Forces (KDF) checkpoints and outposts litter these roads and others, playing several roles in Kenya's arid and semi-arid lands (ASALs) regions. Principal among them is, of course, interdicting the drips and drabs of Al-Shabaab militants infiltrating in small numbers from Somalia. But another prevalent role of past years – particularly since the 2020-2023 drought and ensuing intercommunal violence—has been the army's role in subduing the occurrence of pastoralist-based climate-accentuated conflict.
Dead men do not just walk in Juba — they can now be appointed to election task forces. In one of the most bizarre stories in recent memory, Salva Kiir's government selected Steward Sorobo Budia last week for a new task force comprised of signatories to South Sudan's long-collapsed 2018 peace agreement. Three days later, the president's office was forced to admit that Hon. Sorobo—a former politician from a negligible party —had died 6 years prior, making him unable to serve on the farcical "Leadership Body of the Parties Signatory to the R-ARCSS for Dialogue on Election-Related Matters."